Cargando…

Persistent damaged bases in DNA allow mutagenic break repair in Escherichia coli

Bacteria, yeast and human cancer cells possess mechanisms of mutagenesis upregulated by stress responses. Stress-inducible mutagenesis potentially accelerates adaptation, and may provide important models for mutagenesis that drives cancers, host pathogen interactions, antibiotic resistance and possi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Jessica M., Correa, Raul, Rosenberg, Susan M., Hastings, P. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006733
_version_ 1783255035932573696
author Moore, Jessica M.
Correa, Raul
Rosenberg, Susan M.
Hastings, P. J.
author_facet Moore, Jessica M.
Correa, Raul
Rosenberg, Susan M.
Hastings, P. J.
author_sort Moore, Jessica M.
collection PubMed
description Bacteria, yeast and human cancer cells possess mechanisms of mutagenesis upregulated by stress responses. Stress-inducible mutagenesis potentially accelerates adaptation, and may provide important models for mutagenesis that drives cancers, host pathogen interactions, antibiotic resistance and possibly much of evolution generally. In Escherichia coli repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) becomes mutagenic, using low-fidelity DNA polymerases under the control of the SOS DNA-damage response and RpoS general stress response, which upregulate and allow the action of error-prone DNA polymerases IV (DinB), II and V to make mutations during repair. Pol IV is implied to compete with and replace high-fidelity DNA polymerases at the DSB-repair replisome, causing mutagenesis. We report that up-regulated Pol IV is not sufficient for mutagenic break repair (MBR); damaged bases in the DNA are also required, and that in starvation-stressed cells, these are caused by reactive-oxygen species (ROS). First, MBR is reduced by either ROS-scavenging agents or constitutive activation of oxidative-damage responses, both of which reduce cellular ROS levels. The ROS promote MBR other than by causing DSBs, saturating mismatch repair, oxidizing proteins, or inducing the SOS response or the general stress response. We find that ROS drive MBR through oxidized guanines (8-oxo-dG) in DNA, in that overproduction of a glycosylase that removes 8-oxo-dG from DNA prevents MBR. Further, other damaged DNA bases can substitute for 8-oxo-dG because ROS-scavenged cells resume MBR if either DNA pyrimidine dimers or alkylated bases are induced. We hypothesize that damaged bases in DNA pause the replisome and allow the critical switch from high fidelity to error-prone DNA polymerases in the DSB-repair replisome, thus allowing MBR. The data imply that in addition to the indirect stress-response controlled switch to MBR, a direct cis-acting switch to MBR occurs independently of DNA breakage, caused by ROS oxidation of DNA potentially regulated by ROS regulators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5542668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55426682017-08-12 Persistent damaged bases in DNA allow mutagenic break repair in Escherichia coli Moore, Jessica M. Correa, Raul Rosenberg, Susan M. Hastings, P. J. PLoS Genet Research Article Bacteria, yeast and human cancer cells possess mechanisms of mutagenesis upregulated by stress responses. Stress-inducible mutagenesis potentially accelerates adaptation, and may provide important models for mutagenesis that drives cancers, host pathogen interactions, antibiotic resistance and possibly much of evolution generally. In Escherichia coli repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) becomes mutagenic, using low-fidelity DNA polymerases under the control of the SOS DNA-damage response and RpoS general stress response, which upregulate and allow the action of error-prone DNA polymerases IV (DinB), II and V to make mutations during repair. Pol IV is implied to compete with and replace high-fidelity DNA polymerases at the DSB-repair replisome, causing mutagenesis. We report that up-regulated Pol IV is not sufficient for mutagenic break repair (MBR); damaged bases in the DNA are also required, and that in starvation-stressed cells, these are caused by reactive-oxygen species (ROS). First, MBR is reduced by either ROS-scavenging agents or constitutive activation of oxidative-damage responses, both of which reduce cellular ROS levels. The ROS promote MBR other than by causing DSBs, saturating mismatch repair, oxidizing proteins, or inducing the SOS response or the general stress response. We find that ROS drive MBR through oxidized guanines (8-oxo-dG) in DNA, in that overproduction of a glycosylase that removes 8-oxo-dG from DNA prevents MBR. Further, other damaged DNA bases can substitute for 8-oxo-dG because ROS-scavenged cells resume MBR if either DNA pyrimidine dimers or alkylated bases are induced. We hypothesize that damaged bases in DNA pause the replisome and allow the critical switch from high fidelity to error-prone DNA polymerases in the DSB-repair replisome, thus allowing MBR. The data imply that in addition to the indirect stress-response controlled switch to MBR, a direct cis-acting switch to MBR occurs independently of DNA breakage, caused by ROS oxidation of DNA potentially regulated by ROS regulators. Public Library of Science 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5542668/ /pubmed/28727736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006733 Text en © 2017 Moore et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moore, Jessica M.
Correa, Raul
Rosenberg, Susan M.
Hastings, P. J.
Persistent damaged bases in DNA allow mutagenic break repair in Escherichia coli
title Persistent damaged bases in DNA allow mutagenic break repair in Escherichia coli
title_full Persistent damaged bases in DNA allow mutagenic break repair in Escherichia coli
title_fullStr Persistent damaged bases in DNA allow mutagenic break repair in Escherichia coli
title_full_unstemmed Persistent damaged bases in DNA allow mutagenic break repair in Escherichia coli
title_short Persistent damaged bases in DNA allow mutagenic break repair in Escherichia coli
title_sort persistent damaged bases in dna allow mutagenic break repair in escherichia coli
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006733
work_keys_str_mv AT moorejessicam persistentdamagedbasesindnaallowmutagenicbreakrepairinescherichiacoli
AT correaraul persistentdamagedbasesindnaallowmutagenicbreakrepairinescherichiacoli
AT rosenbergsusanm persistentdamagedbasesindnaallowmutagenicbreakrepairinescherichiacoli
AT hastingspj persistentdamagedbasesindnaallowmutagenicbreakrepairinescherichiacoli