Cargando…

Questionnaire survey of detrimental fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma in Finland

BACKGROUND: In 2007, a previously unrecorded disease, fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma (FENP), was detected in farmed mink (Neovision vision), foxes (Vulpes lagopus) and Finnraccoons (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Finland. Symptoms included severe pyoderma with increased mortality, causing both...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordgren, Heli, Vapalahti, Katariina, Vapalahti, Olli, Sukura, Antti, Virtala, Anna-Maija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28774326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0322-z
_version_ 1783255163578875904
author Nordgren, Heli
Vapalahti, Katariina
Vapalahti, Olli
Sukura, Antti
Virtala, Anna-Maija
author_facet Nordgren, Heli
Vapalahti, Katariina
Vapalahti, Olli
Sukura, Antti
Virtala, Anna-Maija
author_sort Nordgren, Heli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2007, a previously unrecorded disease, fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma (FENP), was detected in farmed mink (Neovision vision), foxes (Vulpes lagopus) and Finnraccoons (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Finland. Symptoms included severe pyoderma with increased mortality, causing both animal welfare problems and economic losses. In 2011, an epidemiologic questionnaire was mailed to all members of the Finnish Fur Breeders’ Association to assess the occurrence of FENP from 2009 through the first 6 months of 2011. The aim was to describe the geographical distribution and detailed clinical signs of FENP, as well as sources of infection and potential risk factors for the disease. RESULTS: A total of 239 farmers (25%) returned the questionnaire. Clinical signs of FENP were observed in 40% (95% CI 34–46%) of the study farms. In addition, the survey clarified the specific clinical signs for different animal species. The presence of disease was associated with the importation of mink, especially from Denmark (OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.6–33.0). The transmission route between Finnish farms was associated with fur animal purchases. Some risk factors such as the farm type were also indicated. As such, FENP was detected more commonly on farms with more than one species of fur animal in comparison to farms with, for example, only foxes (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.4–8.6), and the incidence was higher on farms with over 750 breeder mink compared to smaller farms (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6–9.0). Contact between fur animals and birds and other wildlife increased the risk of FENP on farms. Responses also indicated that blocking the entry of wildlife to the animal premises protected against FENP. CONCLUSIONS: FENP was most likely introduced to Finland by imported mink and spread further within the country via domestically purchased fur animals. Some potential risk factors, such as the type and size of the farm and contact with wildlife, contributed to the spread of FENP. Escape-proof shelter buildings block the entry of wildlife, thus protecting fur animals against FENP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13028-017-0322-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5543541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55435412017-08-07 Questionnaire survey of detrimental fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma in Finland Nordgren, Heli Vapalahti, Katariina Vapalahti, Olli Sukura, Antti Virtala, Anna-Maija Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: In 2007, a previously unrecorded disease, fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma (FENP), was detected in farmed mink (Neovision vision), foxes (Vulpes lagopus) and Finnraccoons (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Finland. Symptoms included severe pyoderma with increased mortality, causing both animal welfare problems and economic losses. In 2011, an epidemiologic questionnaire was mailed to all members of the Finnish Fur Breeders’ Association to assess the occurrence of FENP from 2009 through the first 6 months of 2011. The aim was to describe the geographical distribution and detailed clinical signs of FENP, as well as sources of infection and potential risk factors for the disease. RESULTS: A total of 239 farmers (25%) returned the questionnaire. Clinical signs of FENP were observed in 40% (95% CI 34–46%) of the study farms. In addition, the survey clarified the specific clinical signs for different animal species. The presence of disease was associated with the importation of mink, especially from Denmark (OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.6–33.0). The transmission route between Finnish farms was associated with fur animal purchases. Some risk factors such as the farm type were also indicated. As such, FENP was detected more commonly on farms with more than one species of fur animal in comparison to farms with, for example, only foxes (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.4–8.6), and the incidence was higher on farms with over 750 breeder mink compared to smaller farms (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6–9.0). Contact between fur animals and birds and other wildlife increased the risk of FENP on farms. Responses also indicated that blocking the entry of wildlife to the animal premises protected against FENP. CONCLUSIONS: FENP was most likely introduced to Finland by imported mink and spread further within the country via domestically purchased fur animals. Some potential risk factors, such as the type and size of the farm and contact with wildlife, contributed to the spread of FENP. Escape-proof shelter buildings block the entry of wildlife, thus protecting fur animals against FENP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13028-017-0322-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5543541/ /pubmed/28774326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0322-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nordgren, Heli
Vapalahti, Katariina
Vapalahti, Olli
Sukura, Antti
Virtala, Anna-Maija
Questionnaire survey of detrimental fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma in Finland
title Questionnaire survey of detrimental fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma in Finland
title_full Questionnaire survey of detrimental fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma in Finland
title_fullStr Questionnaire survey of detrimental fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Questionnaire survey of detrimental fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma in Finland
title_short Questionnaire survey of detrimental fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma in Finland
title_sort questionnaire survey of detrimental fur animal epidemic necrotic pyoderma in finland
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28774326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0322-z
work_keys_str_mv AT nordgrenheli questionnairesurveyofdetrimentalfuranimalepidemicnecroticpyodermainfinland
AT vapalahtikatariina questionnairesurveyofdetrimentalfuranimalepidemicnecroticpyodermainfinland
AT vapalahtiolli questionnairesurveyofdetrimentalfuranimalepidemicnecroticpyodermainfinland
AT sukuraantti questionnairesurveyofdetrimentalfuranimalepidemicnecroticpyodermainfinland
AT virtalaannamaija questionnairesurveyofdetrimentalfuranimalepidemicnecroticpyodermainfinland