Cargando…
(18)F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28774338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5 |
_version_ | 1783255172653252608 |
---|---|
author | Korn, Ronald L. Von Hoff, Daniel D. Borad, Mitesh J. Renschler, Markus F. McGovern, Desmond Curtis Bay, R. Ramanathan, Ramesh K. |
author_facet | Korn, Ronald L. Von Hoff, Daniel D. Borad, Mitesh J. Renschler, Markus F. McGovern, Desmond Curtis Bay, R. Ramanathan, Ramesh K. |
author_sort | Korn, Ronald L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. METHODS: Tumors were measured by [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) and 125 mg/m(2) cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m(2). All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r (s) = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00398086. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5543580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55435802017-08-07 (18)F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer Korn, Ronald L. Von Hoff, Daniel D. Borad, Mitesh J. Renschler, Markus F. McGovern, Desmond Curtis Bay, R. Ramanathan, Ramesh K. Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. METHODS: Tumors were measured by [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) and 125 mg/m(2) cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m(2). All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r (s) = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00398086. BioMed Central 2017-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5543580/ /pubmed/28774338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Korn, Ronald L. Von Hoff, Daniel D. Borad, Mitesh J. Renschler, Markus F. McGovern, Desmond Curtis Bay, R. Ramanathan, Ramesh K. (18)F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer |
title | (18)F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_full | (18)F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_fullStr | (18)F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | (18)F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_short | (18)F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_sort | (18)f-fdg pet/ct response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28774338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kornronaldl 18ffdgpetctresponseinaphase12trialofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabineforadvancedpancreaticcancer AT vonhoffdanield 18ffdgpetctresponseinaphase12trialofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabineforadvancedpancreaticcancer AT boradmiteshj 18ffdgpetctresponseinaphase12trialofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabineforadvancedpancreaticcancer AT renschlermarkusf 18ffdgpetctresponseinaphase12trialofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabineforadvancedpancreaticcancer AT mcgoverndesmond 18ffdgpetctresponseinaphase12trialofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabineforadvancedpancreaticcancer AT curtisbayr 18ffdgpetctresponseinaphase12trialofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabineforadvancedpancreaticcancer AT ramanathanrameshk 18ffdgpetctresponseinaphase12trialofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabineforadvancedpancreaticcancer |