Cargando…

A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative characteristics of stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: We reviewed 40 adult patients who received a stand-alone cage for elective ACDF and matche...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Overley, Samuel C., Merrill, Robert K., Leven, Dante M., Meaike, Joshua J., Kumar, Abhishek, Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217699211
_version_ 1783255229909696512
author Overley, Samuel C.
Merrill, Robert K.
Leven, Dante M.
Meaike, Joshua J.
Kumar, Abhishek
Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
author_facet Overley, Samuel C.
Merrill, Robert K.
Leven, Dante M.
Meaike, Joshua J.
Kumar, Abhishek
Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
author_sort Overley, Samuel C.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative characteristics of stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: We reviewed 40 adult patients who received a stand-alone cage for elective ACDF and matched them with 40 patients who received an anterior cervical plate. We statistically compared operative time, length of stay, proportion of ambulatory cases, overall complications necessitating a trip to the ED, readmission, or reoperation related to index procedure. RESULTS: There were 21 women and 19 men in the plate cohort with average ages of 53 years ± 12 and 20 women and 20 men in the stand-alone group with an average age of 52 years ± 11. With no statistical difference in total number, the plate group experienced 4 short-term (within 90 days of discharge) complications, including 3 patients who visited the emergency department for dysphagia and 1 who visited the emergency department for severe back pain, while the stand-alone group experienced 0 complications. There was no significant difference in operative time between the stand-alone group (75.35 min) and the plate group (81.35 min; P = .37). There was a significant difference between the proportion of ambulatory cases in the stand-alone group (25) and the plate group (6; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that stand-alone cages have fewer complications compared to anterior plating, with a lower trend of incidence of postoperative dysphagia. Stand-alone cages may offer the advantage of sending patients home ambulatory after ACDF surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5544154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55441542017-08-15 A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Overley, Samuel C. Merrill, Robert K. Leven, Dante M. Meaike, Joshua J. Kumar, Abhishek Qureshi, Sheeraz A. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative characteristics of stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: We reviewed 40 adult patients who received a stand-alone cage for elective ACDF and matched them with 40 patients who received an anterior cervical plate. We statistically compared operative time, length of stay, proportion of ambulatory cases, overall complications necessitating a trip to the ED, readmission, or reoperation related to index procedure. RESULTS: There were 21 women and 19 men in the plate cohort with average ages of 53 years ± 12 and 20 women and 20 men in the stand-alone group with an average age of 52 years ± 11. With no statistical difference in total number, the plate group experienced 4 short-term (within 90 days of discharge) complications, including 3 patients who visited the emergency department for dysphagia and 1 who visited the emergency department for severe back pain, while the stand-alone group experienced 0 complications. There was no significant difference in operative time between the stand-alone group (75.35 min) and the plate group (81.35 min; P = .37). There was a significant difference between the proportion of ambulatory cases in the stand-alone group (25) and the plate group (6; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that stand-alone cages have fewer complications compared to anterior plating, with a lower trend of incidence of postoperative dysphagia. Stand-alone cages may offer the advantage of sending patients home ambulatory after ACDF surgery. SAGE Publications 2017-04-19 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5544154/ /pubmed/28811982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217699211 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Overley, Samuel C.
Merrill, Robert K.
Leven, Dante M.
Meaike, Joshua J.
Kumar, Abhishek
Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_full A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_fullStr A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_full_unstemmed A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_short A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_sort matched cohort analysis comparing stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217699211
work_keys_str_mv AT overleysamuelc amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT merrillrobertk amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT levendantem amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT meaikejoshuaj amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT kumarabhishek amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT qureshisheeraza amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT overleysamuelc matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT merrillrobertk matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT levendantem matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT meaikejoshuaj matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT kumarabhishek matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT qureshisheeraza matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion