Cargando…
A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative characteristics of stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: We reviewed 40 adult patients who received a stand-alone cage for elective ACDF and matche...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217699211 |
_version_ | 1783255229909696512 |
---|---|
author | Overley, Samuel C. Merrill, Robert K. Leven, Dante M. Meaike, Joshua J. Kumar, Abhishek Qureshi, Sheeraz A. |
author_facet | Overley, Samuel C. Merrill, Robert K. Leven, Dante M. Meaike, Joshua J. Kumar, Abhishek Qureshi, Sheeraz A. |
author_sort | Overley, Samuel C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative characteristics of stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: We reviewed 40 adult patients who received a stand-alone cage for elective ACDF and matched them with 40 patients who received an anterior cervical plate. We statistically compared operative time, length of stay, proportion of ambulatory cases, overall complications necessitating a trip to the ED, readmission, or reoperation related to index procedure. RESULTS: There were 21 women and 19 men in the plate cohort with average ages of 53 years ± 12 and 20 women and 20 men in the stand-alone group with an average age of 52 years ± 11. With no statistical difference in total number, the plate group experienced 4 short-term (within 90 days of discharge) complications, including 3 patients who visited the emergency department for dysphagia and 1 who visited the emergency department for severe back pain, while the stand-alone group experienced 0 complications. There was no significant difference in operative time between the stand-alone group (75.35 min) and the plate group (81.35 min; P = .37). There was a significant difference between the proportion of ambulatory cases in the stand-alone group (25) and the plate group (6; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that stand-alone cages have fewer complications compared to anterior plating, with a lower trend of incidence of postoperative dysphagia. Stand-alone cages may offer the advantage of sending patients home ambulatory after ACDF surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5544154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55441542017-08-15 A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Overley, Samuel C. Merrill, Robert K. Leven, Dante M. Meaike, Joshua J. Kumar, Abhishek Qureshi, Sheeraz A. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative characteristics of stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: We reviewed 40 adult patients who received a stand-alone cage for elective ACDF and matched them with 40 patients who received an anterior cervical plate. We statistically compared operative time, length of stay, proportion of ambulatory cases, overall complications necessitating a trip to the ED, readmission, or reoperation related to index procedure. RESULTS: There were 21 women and 19 men in the plate cohort with average ages of 53 years ± 12 and 20 women and 20 men in the stand-alone group with an average age of 52 years ± 11. With no statistical difference in total number, the plate group experienced 4 short-term (within 90 days of discharge) complications, including 3 patients who visited the emergency department for dysphagia and 1 who visited the emergency department for severe back pain, while the stand-alone group experienced 0 complications. There was no significant difference in operative time between the stand-alone group (75.35 min) and the plate group (81.35 min; P = .37). There was a significant difference between the proportion of ambulatory cases in the stand-alone group (25) and the plate group (6; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that stand-alone cages have fewer complications compared to anterior plating, with a lower trend of incidence of postoperative dysphagia. Stand-alone cages may offer the advantage of sending patients home ambulatory after ACDF surgery. SAGE Publications 2017-04-19 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5544154/ /pubmed/28811982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217699211 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Overley, Samuel C. Merrill, Robert K. Leven, Dante M. Meaike, Joshua J. Kumar, Abhishek Qureshi, Sheeraz A. A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion |
title | A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion |
title_full | A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion |
title_fullStr | A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion |
title_short | A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion |
title_sort | matched cohort analysis comparing stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217699211 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT overleysamuelc amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT merrillrobertk amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT levendantem amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT meaikejoshuaj amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT kumarabhishek amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT qureshisheeraza amatchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT overleysamuelc matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT merrillrobertk matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT levendantem matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT meaikejoshuaj matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT kumarabhishek matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT qureshisheeraza matchedcohortanalysiscomparingstandalonecagesandanteriorcervicalplatesusedforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion |