Cargando…
Implementation of a diabetes in pregnancy clinical register in a complex setting: Findings from a process evaluation
BACKGROUND: Rates of diabetes in pregnancy are disproportionately higher among Aboriginal than non-Aboriginal women in Australia. Additional challenges are posed by the context of Aboriginal health including remoteness and disadvantage. A clinical register was established in 2011 to improve care coo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28777799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179487 |
_version_ | 1783255236282941440 |
---|---|
author | Kirkham, Renae Whitbread, Cherie Connors, Christine Moore, Elizabeth Boyle, Jacqueline A. Richa, Richa Barzi, Federica Li, Shu Dowden, Michelle Oats, Jeremy Inglis, Chrissie Cotter, Margaret McIntyre, Harold D. Kirkwood, Marie Van Dokkum, Paula Svenson, Stacey Zimmet, Paul Shaw, Jonathan E. O’Dea, Kerin Brown, Alex Maple-Brown, Louise |
author_facet | Kirkham, Renae Whitbread, Cherie Connors, Christine Moore, Elizabeth Boyle, Jacqueline A. Richa, Richa Barzi, Federica Li, Shu Dowden, Michelle Oats, Jeremy Inglis, Chrissie Cotter, Margaret McIntyre, Harold D. Kirkwood, Marie Van Dokkum, Paula Svenson, Stacey Zimmet, Paul Shaw, Jonathan E. O’Dea, Kerin Brown, Alex Maple-Brown, Louise |
author_sort | Kirkham, Renae |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rates of diabetes in pregnancy are disproportionately higher among Aboriginal than non-Aboriginal women in Australia. Additional challenges are posed by the context of Aboriginal health including remoteness and disadvantage. A clinical register was established in 2011 to improve care coordination, and as an epidemiological and quality assurance tool. This paper presents results from a process evaluation identifying what worked well, persisting challenges and opportunities for improvement. METHODS: Clinical register data were compared to the Northern Territory Midwives Data Collection. A cross-sectional survey of 113 health professionals across the region was also conducted in 2016 to assess use and value of the register; and five focus groups (49 healthcare professionals) documented improvements to models of care. RESULTS: From January 2012 to December 2015, 1,410 women were referred to the register, 48% of whom were Aboriginal. In 2014, women on the register represented 75% of those on the Midwives Data Collection for Aboriginal women with gestational diabetes and 100% for Aboriginal women with pre-existing diabetes. Since commencement of the register, an 80% increase in reported prevalence of gestational diabetes among Aboriginal women in the Midwives Data Collection occurred (2011–2013), prior to adoption of new diagnostic criteria (2014). As most women met both diagnostic criteria (81% in 2012 and 74% in 2015) it is unlikely that the changes in criteria contributed to this increase. Over half (57%) of survey respondents reported improvement in knowledge of the epidemiology of diabetes in pregnancy since establishment of the register. However, only 32% of survey respondents thought that the register improved care-coordination. The need for improved integration and awareness to increase use was also highlighted. CONCLUSION: Although the register has not been reported to improve care coordination, it has contributed to increased reported prevalence of gestational diabetes among high risk Aboriginal women, in a routinely collected jurisdiction-wide pregnancy dataset. It has therefore contributed to an improved understanding of epidemiology and disease burden and may in future contribute to improved management and outcomes. Regions with similar challenges in context and high risk populations for diabetes in pregnancy may benefit from this experience of implementing a register. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5544201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55442012017-08-12 Implementation of a diabetes in pregnancy clinical register in a complex setting: Findings from a process evaluation Kirkham, Renae Whitbread, Cherie Connors, Christine Moore, Elizabeth Boyle, Jacqueline A. Richa, Richa Barzi, Federica Li, Shu Dowden, Michelle Oats, Jeremy Inglis, Chrissie Cotter, Margaret McIntyre, Harold D. Kirkwood, Marie Van Dokkum, Paula Svenson, Stacey Zimmet, Paul Shaw, Jonathan E. O’Dea, Kerin Brown, Alex Maple-Brown, Louise PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Rates of diabetes in pregnancy are disproportionately higher among Aboriginal than non-Aboriginal women in Australia. Additional challenges are posed by the context of Aboriginal health including remoteness and disadvantage. A clinical register was established in 2011 to improve care coordination, and as an epidemiological and quality assurance tool. This paper presents results from a process evaluation identifying what worked well, persisting challenges and opportunities for improvement. METHODS: Clinical register data were compared to the Northern Territory Midwives Data Collection. A cross-sectional survey of 113 health professionals across the region was also conducted in 2016 to assess use and value of the register; and five focus groups (49 healthcare professionals) documented improvements to models of care. RESULTS: From January 2012 to December 2015, 1,410 women were referred to the register, 48% of whom were Aboriginal. In 2014, women on the register represented 75% of those on the Midwives Data Collection for Aboriginal women with gestational diabetes and 100% for Aboriginal women with pre-existing diabetes. Since commencement of the register, an 80% increase in reported prevalence of gestational diabetes among Aboriginal women in the Midwives Data Collection occurred (2011–2013), prior to adoption of new diagnostic criteria (2014). As most women met both diagnostic criteria (81% in 2012 and 74% in 2015) it is unlikely that the changes in criteria contributed to this increase. Over half (57%) of survey respondents reported improvement in knowledge of the epidemiology of diabetes in pregnancy since establishment of the register. However, only 32% of survey respondents thought that the register improved care-coordination. The need for improved integration and awareness to increase use was also highlighted. CONCLUSION: Although the register has not been reported to improve care coordination, it has contributed to increased reported prevalence of gestational diabetes among high risk Aboriginal women, in a routinely collected jurisdiction-wide pregnancy dataset. It has therefore contributed to an improved understanding of epidemiology and disease burden and may in future contribute to improved management and outcomes. Regions with similar challenges in context and high risk populations for diabetes in pregnancy may benefit from this experience of implementing a register. Public Library of Science 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5544201/ /pubmed/28777799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179487 Text en © 2017 Kirkham et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kirkham, Renae Whitbread, Cherie Connors, Christine Moore, Elizabeth Boyle, Jacqueline A. Richa, Richa Barzi, Federica Li, Shu Dowden, Michelle Oats, Jeremy Inglis, Chrissie Cotter, Margaret McIntyre, Harold D. Kirkwood, Marie Van Dokkum, Paula Svenson, Stacey Zimmet, Paul Shaw, Jonathan E. O’Dea, Kerin Brown, Alex Maple-Brown, Louise Implementation of a diabetes in pregnancy clinical register in a complex setting: Findings from a process evaluation |
title | Implementation of a diabetes in pregnancy clinical register in a complex setting: Findings from a process evaluation |
title_full | Implementation of a diabetes in pregnancy clinical register in a complex setting: Findings from a process evaluation |
title_fullStr | Implementation of a diabetes in pregnancy clinical register in a complex setting: Findings from a process evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of a diabetes in pregnancy clinical register in a complex setting: Findings from a process evaluation |
title_short | Implementation of a diabetes in pregnancy clinical register in a complex setting: Findings from a process evaluation |
title_sort | implementation of a diabetes in pregnancy clinical register in a complex setting: findings from a process evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28777799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirkhamrenae implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT whitbreadcherie implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT connorschristine implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT mooreelizabeth implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT boylejacquelinea implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT richaricha implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT barzifederica implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT lishu implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT dowdenmichelle implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT oatsjeremy implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT inglischrissie implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT cottermargaret implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT mcintyreharoldd implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT kirkwoodmarie implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT vandokkumpaula implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT svensonstacey implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT zimmetpaul implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT shawjonathane implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT odeakerin implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT brownalex implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT maplebrownlouise implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation AT implementationofadiabetesinpregnancyclinicalregisterinacomplexsettingfindingsfromaprocessevaluation |