Cargando…

Modeling the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who are Failing To Meet Glycemic Targets on Basal Insulin Alone in The Netherlands

INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) is the first basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) in a single pen injection device, and a once-daily treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are uncontrolled on basal insulin and req...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hunt, Barnaby, Glah, Divina, van der Vliet, Maarten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0266-3
_version_ 1783255271438548992
author Hunt, Barnaby
Glah, Divina
van der Vliet, Maarten
author_facet Hunt, Barnaby
Glah, Divina
van der Vliet, Maarten
author_sort Hunt, Barnaby
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) is the first basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) in a single pen injection device, and a once-daily treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are uncontrolled on basal insulin and require treatment intensification. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of IDegLira versus basal-bolus therapy (insulin glargine U100 + 3× daily insulin aspart) for patients with T2DM uncontrolled on basal insulin [HbA(1c) >53 mmol/mol (>7%)] in the Netherlands. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the validated IMS CORE Diabetes Model from a healthcare payer perspective. Outcomes were modeled over patient lifetimes in a cohort with baseline characteristics from the DUAL™ II trial. Treatment effect data were sourced from a statistical indirect comparison (pooled analysis) of IDegLira with basal-bolus therapy. RESULTS: Treatment with IDegLira resulted in mean increases in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.43 quality-adjusted life years versus basal-bolus therapy. Improved clinical outcomes resulted from fewer diabetes-related complications and a delayed time to their onset. IDegLira was associated with lower costs of EUR 4679 versus basal-bolus therapy, a result of lower pharmacy costs and avoided diabetes-related complications. Thus, IDegLira was dominant, i.e., both more effective and less costly than basal-bolus therapy. CONCLUSIONS: IDegLira is an effective treatment option to improve glycemic control without incurring an increased risk of hypoglycemia or weight gain. This analysis suggests that IDegLira is cost-effective versus basal-bolus therapy in patients with T2DM who are uncontrolled on basal insulin in the Netherlands. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0266-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5544604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55446042017-08-18 Modeling the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who are Failing To Meet Glycemic Targets on Basal Insulin Alone in The Netherlands Hunt, Barnaby Glah, Divina van der Vliet, Maarten Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) is the first basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) in a single pen injection device, and a once-daily treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are uncontrolled on basal insulin and require treatment intensification. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of IDegLira versus basal-bolus therapy (insulin glargine U100 + 3× daily insulin aspart) for patients with T2DM uncontrolled on basal insulin [HbA(1c) >53 mmol/mol (>7%)] in the Netherlands. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the validated IMS CORE Diabetes Model from a healthcare payer perspective. Outcomes were modeled over patient lifetimes in a cohort with baseline characteristics from the DUAL™ II trial. Treatment effect data were sourced from a statistical indirect comparison (pooled analysis) of IDegLira with basal-bolus therapy. RESULTS: Treatment with IDegLira resulted in mean increases in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.43 quality-adjusted life years versus basal-bolus therapy. Improved clinical outcomes resulted from fewer diabetes-related complications and a delayed time to their onset. IDegLira was associated with lower costs of EUR 4679 versus basal-bolus therapy, a result of lower pharmacy costs and avoided diabetes-related complications. Thus, IDegLira was dominant, i.e., both more effective and less costly than basal-bolus therapy. CONCLUSIONS: IDegLira is an effective treatment option to improve glycemic control without incurring an increased risk of hypoglycemia or weight gain. This analysis suggests that IDegLira is cost-effective versus basal-bolus therapy in patients with T2DM who are uncontrolled on basal insulin in the Netherlands. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0266-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2017-05-18 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5544604/ /pubmed/28523483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0266-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hunt, Barnaby
Glah, Divina
van der Vliet, Maarten
Modeling the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who are Failing To Meet Glycemic Targets on Basal Insulin Alone in The Netherlands
title Modeling the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who are Failing To Meet Glycemic Targets on Basal Insulin Alone in The Netherlands
title_full Modeling the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who are Failing To Meet Glycemic Targets on Basal Insulin Alone in The Netherlands
title_fullStr Modeling the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who are Failing To Meet Glycemic Targets on Basal Insulin Alone in The Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who are Failing To Meet Glycemic Targets on Basal Insulin Alone in The Netherlands
title_short Modeling the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who are Failing To Meet Glycemic Targets on Basal Insulin Alone in The Netherlands
title_sort modeling the long-term cost-effectiveness of ideglira in patients with type 2 diabetes who are failing to meet glycemic targets on basal insulin alone in the netherlands
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0266-3
work_keys_str_mv AT huntbarnaby modelingthelongtermcosteffectivenessofideglirainpatientswithtype2diabeteswhoarefailingtomeetglycemictargetsonbasalinsulinaloneinthenetherlands
AT glahdivina modelingthelongtermcosteffectivenessofideglirainpatientswithtype2diabeteswhoarefailingtomeetglycemictargetsonbasalinsulinaloneinthenetherlands
AT vandervlietmaarten modelingthelongtermcosteffectivenessofideglirainpatientswithtype2diabeteswhoarefailingtomeetglycemictargetsonbasalinsulinaloneinthenetherlands