Cargando…

Differential Treatment Response to Insulin Intensification Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial Comparing Premixed and Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens

INTRODUCTION: Identification of subgroups of patients that may benefit most from certain treatment is important because individual treatment response varies due to multiple contributing factors. The present study used the subgroup identification based on the differential effect search (SIDES) algori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Li Xin, Li, Peng Fei, Hou, Jia Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0286-z
_version_ 1783255275603492864
author Shi, Li Xin
Li, Peng Fei
Hou, Jia Ning
author_facet Shi, Li Xin
Li, Peng Fei
Hou, Jia Ning
author_sort Shi, Li Xin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Identification of subgroups of patients that may benefit most from certain treatment is important because individual treatment response varies due to multiple contributing factors. The present study used the subgroup identification based on the differential effect search (SIDES) algorithm to identify subgroups with different treatment responses to insulin intensification therapies. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a 24-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel study comparing prandial premixed therapy (PPT) to basal-bolus therapy (BBT). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to PPT (insulin lispro mix 50/50 thrice daily with meals) or BBT (glargine at bedtime plus mealtime insulin lispro) insulin intensification therapies. The SIDES algorithm was used to identify the subgroups from at-goal patients [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0% (53.0 mmol/mol) at the end of 24 weeks; n = 182] who could have benefitted from insulin intensification therapies. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of overall at-goal patients were comparable between PPT and BBT groups. The SIDES algorithm identified patients with race other than Caucasian (i.e., African–American, Asian, and Hispanic) and baseline fasting blood glucose (FBG) <8.89 mmol/L as a subgroup that could respond better to PPT relative to BBT than the overall at-goal patient population. In this identified subgroup population, the HbA1c mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline to endpoint in PPT and BBT groups were −2.27 (0.88)% versus −2.05 (0.75)%; p = 0.40, respectively; while in the overall at-goal patients, the HbA1c changes were −2.17 (0.79)% versus −2.34 (1.00)%; p = 0.19, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results showed that the subgroup of patients with race other than Caucasian and FBG <8.89 mmol/L may respond better to premixed intensification therapy. This result provides some preliminary information for further investigation in prospective studies. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID number: NCT00110370.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5544622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55446222017-08-18 Differential Treatment Response to Insulin Intensification Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial Comparing Premixed and Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens Shi, Li Xin Li, Peng Fei Hou, Jia Ning Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Identification of subgroups of patients that may benefit most from certain treatment is important because individual treatment response varies due to multiple contributing factors. The present study used the subgroup identification based on the differential effect search (SIDES) algorithm to identify subgroups with different treatment responses to insulin intensification therapies. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a 24-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel study comparing prandial premixed therapy (PPT) to basal-bolus therapy (BBT). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to PPT (insulin lispro mix 50/50 thrice daily with meals) or BBT (glargine at bedtime plus mealtime insulin lispro) insulin intensification therapies. The SIDES algorithm was used to identify the subgroups from at-goal patients [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0% (53.0 mmol/mol) at the end of 24 weeks; n = 182] who could have benefitted from insulin intensification therapies. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of overall at-goal patients were comparable between PPT and BBT groups. The SIDES algorithm identified patients with race other than Caucasian (i.e., African–American, Asian, and Hispanic) and baseline fasting blood glucose (FBG) <8.89 mmol/L as a subgroup that could respond better to PPT relative to BBT than the overall at-goal patient population. In this identified subgroup population, the HbA1c mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline to endpoint in PPT and BBT groups were −2.27 (0.88)% versus −2.05 (0.75)%; p = 0.40, respectively; while in the overall at-goal patients, the HbA1c changes were −2.17 (0.79)% versus −2.34 (1.00)%; p = 0.19, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results showed that the subgroup of patients with race other than Caucasian and FBG <8.89 mmol/L may respond better to premixed intensification therapy. This result provides some preliminary information for further investigation in prospective studies. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID number: NCT00110370. Springer Healthcare 2017-06-30 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5544622/ /pubmed/28667381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0286-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shi, Li Xin
Li, Peng Fei
Hou, Jia Ning
Differential Treatment Response to Insulin Intensification Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial Comparing Premixed and Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens
title Differential Treatment Response to Insulin Intensification Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial Comparing Premixed and Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens
title_full Differential Treatment Response to Insulin Intensification Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial Comparing Premixed and Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens
title_fullStr Differential Treatment Response to Insulin Intensification Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial Comparing Premixed and Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens
title_full_unstemmed Differential Treatment Response to Insulin Intensification Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial Comparing Premixed and Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens
title_short Differential Treatment Response to Insulin Intensification Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial Comparing Premixed and Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens
title_sort differential treatment response to insulin intensification therapy: a post hoc analysis of a randomized trial comparing premixed and basal-bolus insulin regimens
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0286-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shilixin differentialtreatmentresponsetoinsulinintensificationtherapyaposthocanalysisofarandomizedtrialcomparingpremixedandbasalbolusinsulinregimens
AT lipengfei differentialtreatmentresponsetoinsulinintensificationtherapyaposthocanalysisofarandomizedtrialcomparingpremixedandbasalbolusinsulinregimens
AT houjianing differentialtreatmentresponsetoinsulinintensificationtherapyaposthocanalysisofarandomizedtrialcomparingpremixedandbasalbolusinsulinregimens