Cargando…
Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis
This meta-analysis was designed to compare the longevity of the survivorship of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). All studies reporting survival rates in patients who underwent open or closed wedge HTO with more than 5-year follow-up duration were included in the meta-analysi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28779084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07856-8 |
_version_ | 1783255295811649536 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jun-Ho Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Dae-Hee |
author_facet | Kim, Jun-Ho Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Dae-Hee |
author_sort | Kim, Jun-Ho |
collection | PubMed |
description | This meta-analysis was designed to compare the longevity of the survivorship of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). All studies reporting survival rates in patients who underwent open or closed wedge HTO with more than 5-year follow-up duration were included in the meta-analysis. Survival time was considered as time to conversion to TKA. Twenty three studies were included in meta-analysis, 20 of which were of level IV evidence. The pooled 5-year survival rates were 95.1% (95% CI: 93.1 to 97.1%) in open wedge HTO and 93.9% (95% CI: 93.1 to 94.6%) in closed wedge HTO. Although there was 1.2% greater survival rate in open wedge HTO than in closed wedge HTO, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.419). Pooled 10-year survival rates were 91.6% (95% CI: 88.5 to 94.8%) in open wedge HTO and 85.4% (95% CI: 84.0 to 86.7%) in closed wedge HTO, indicating that open wedge HTO had 6.2% greater survival rate 10 years after surgery than did closed wedge HTO (P = 0.002). No difference in 5-year survivorship was found between open- and closed-wedge HTO. However, the survival rate was higher in open-wedge HTOs than in closed wedge HTO at 10 years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5544741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55447412017-08-09 Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis Kim, Jun-Ho Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Dae-Hee Sci Rep Article This meta-analysis was designed to compare the longevity of the survivorship of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). All studies reporting survival rates in patients who underwent open or closed wedge HTO with more than 5-year follow-up duration were included in the meta-analysis. Survival time was considered as time to conversion to TKA. Twenty three studies were included in meta-analysis, 20 of which were of level IV evidence. The pooled 5-year survival rates were 95.1% (95% CI: 93.1 to 97.1%) in open wedge HTO and 93.9% (95% CI: 93.1 to 94.6%) in closed wedge HTO. Although there was 1.2% greater survival rate in open wedge HTO than in closed wedge HTO, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.419). Pooled 10-year survival rates were 91.6% (95% CI: 88.5 to 94.8%) in open wedge HTO and 85.4% (95% CI: 84.0 to 86.7%) in closed wedge HTO, indicating that open wedge HTO had 6.2% greater survival rate 10 years after surgery than did closed wedge HTO (P = 0.002). No difference in 5-year survivorship was found between open- and closed-wedge HTO. However, the survival rate was higher in open-wedge HTOs than in closed wedge HTO at 10 years. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5544741/ /pubmed/28779084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07856-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Jun-Ho Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Dae-Hee Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis |
title | Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28779084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07856-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjunho survivalofopeningversusclosingwedgehightibialosteotomyametaanalysis AT kimhyunjung survivalofopeningversusclosingwedgehightibialosteotomyametaanalysis AT leedaehee survivalofopeningversusclosingwedgehightibialosteotomyametaanalysis |