Cargando…
Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application
BACKGROUND: Telemedicine applications have been increasing due to the development of new computer science technologies and of more advanced telemedical devices. Various types of telerehabilitation treatments and their relative intensities and duration have been reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733271 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.7511 |
_version_ | 1783255328692895744 |
---|---|
author | Peretti, Alessandro Amenta, Francesco Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow Nittari, Giulio Mahdi, Syed Sarosh |
author_facet | Peretti, Alessandro Amenta, Francesco Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow Nittari, Giulio Mahdi, Syed Sarosh |
author_sort | Peretti, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Telemedicine applications have been increasing due to the development of new computer science technologies and of more advanced telemedical devices. Various types of telerehabilitation treatments and their relative intensities and duration have been reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the rehabilitation techniques for remote sites (telerehabilitation) and their fields of application, with analysis of the benefits and the drawbacks related to use. We discuss future applications of telerehabilitation techniques with an emphasis on the development of high-tech devices, and on which new tools and applications can be used in the future. METHODS: We retrieved relevant information and data on telerehabilitation from books, articles and online materials using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) “telerehabilitation,” “telemedicine,” and “rehabilitation,” as well as “disabling pathologies.” RESULTS: Telerehabilitation can be considered as a branch of telemedicine. Although this field is considerably new, its use has rapidly grown in developed countries. In general, telerehabilitation reduces the costs of both health care providers and patients compared with traditional inpatient or person-to-person rehabilitation. Furthermore, patients who live in remote places, where traditional rehabilitation services may not be easily accessible, can benefit from this technology. However, certain disadvantages of telerehabilitation, including skepticism on the part of patients due to remote interaction with their physicians or rehabilitators, should not be underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: This review evaluated different application fields of telerehabilitation, highlighting its benefits and drawbacks. This study may be a starting point for improving approaches and devices for telerehabilitation. In this context, patients’ feedback may be important to adapt rehabilitation techniques and approaches to their needs, which would subsequently help to improve the quality of rehabilitation in the future. The need for proper training and education of people involved in this new and emerging form of intervention for more effective treatment can’t be overstated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5544892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55448922017-08-16 Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application Peretti, Alessandro Amenta, Francesco Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow Nittari, Giulio Mahdi, Syed Sarosh JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol Review BACKGROUND: Telemedicine applications have been increasing due to the development of new computer science technologies and of more advanced telemedical devices. Various types of telerehabilitation treatments and their relative intensities and duration have been reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the rehabilitation techniques for remote sites (telerehabilitation) and their fields of application, with analysis of the benefits and the drawbacks related to use. We discuss future applications of telerehabilitation techniques with an emphasis on the development of high-tech devices, and on which new tools and applications can be used in the future. METHODS: We retrieved relevant information and data on telerehabilitation from books, articles and online materials using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) “telerehabilitation,” “telemedicine,” and “rehabilitation,” as well as “disabling pathologies.” RESULTS: Telerehabilitation can be considered as a branch of telemedicine. Although this field is considerably new, its use has rapidly grown in developed countries. In general, telerehabilitation reduces the costs of both health care providers and patients compared with traditional inpatient or person-to-person rehabilitation. Furthermore, patients who live in remote places, where traditional rehabilitation services may not be easily accessible, can benefit from this technology. However, certain disadvantages of telerehabilitation, including skepticism on the part of patients due to remote interaction with their physicians or rehabilitators, should not be underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: This review evaluated different application fields of telerehabilitation, highlighting its benefits and drawbacks. This study may be a starting point for improving approaches and devices for telerehabilitation. In this context, patients’ feedback may be important to adapt rehabilitation techniques and approaches to their needs, which would subsequently help to improve the quality of rehabilitation in the future. The need for proper training and education of people involved in this new and emerging form of intervention for more effective treatment can’t be overstated. JMIR Publications 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5544892/ /pubmed/28733271 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.7511 Text en ©Alessandro Peretti, Francesco Amenta, Seyed Khosrow Tayebati, Giulio Nittari, Syed Sarosh Mahdi. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 21.07.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Peretti, Alessandro Amenta, Francesco Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow Nittari, Giulio Mahdi, Syed Sarosh Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application |
title | Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application |
title_full | Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application |
title_fullStr | Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application |
title_full_unstemmed | Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application |
title_short | Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application |
title_sort | telerehabilitation: review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733271 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.7511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perettialessandro telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication AT amentafrancesco telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication AT tayebatiseyedkhosrow telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication AT nittarigiulio telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication AT mahdisyedsarosh telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication |