Cargando…

Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine applications have been increasing due to the development of new computer science technologies and of more advanced telemedical devices. Various types of telerehabilitation treatments and their relative intensities and duration have been reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peretti, Alessandro, Amenta, Francesco, Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow, Nittari, Giulio, Mahdi, Syed Sarosh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733271
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.7511
_version_ 1783255328692895744
author Peretti, Alessandro
Amenta, Francesco
Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow
Nittari, Giulio
Mahdi, Syed Sarosh
author_facet Peretti, Alessandro
Amenta, Francesco
Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow
Nittari, Giulio
Mahdi, Syed Sarosh
author_sort Peretti, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telemedicine applications have been increasing due to the development of new computer science technologies and of more advanced telemedical devices. Various types of telerehabilitation treatments and their relative intensities and duration have been reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the rehabilitation techniques for remote sites (telerehabilitation) and their fields of application, with analysis of the benefits and the drawbacks related to use. We discuss future applications of telerehabilitation techniques with an emphasis on the development of high-tech devices, and on which new tools and applications can be used in the future. METHODS: We retrieved relevant information and data on telerehabilitation from books, articles and online materials using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) “telerehabilitation,” “telemedicine,” and “rehabilitation,” as well as “disabling pathologies.” RESULTS: Telerehabilitation can be considered as a branch of telemedicine. Although this field is considerably new, its use has rapidly grown in developed countries. In general, telerehabilitation reduces the costs of both health care providers and patients compared with traditional inpatient or person-to-person rehabilitation. Furthermore, patients who live in remote places, where traditional rehabilitation services may not be easily accessible, can benefit from this technology. However, certain disadvantages of telerehabilitation, including skepticism on the part of patients due to remote interaction with their physicians or rehabilitators, should not be underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: This review evaluated different application fields of telerehabilitation, highlighting its benefits and drawbacks. This study may be a starting point for improving approaches and devices for telerehabilitation. In this context, patients’ feedback may be important to adapt rehabilitation techniques and approaches to their needs, which would subsequently help to improve the quality of rehabilitation in the future. The need for proper training and education of people involved in this new and emerging form of intervention for more effective treatment can’t be overstated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5544892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55448922017-08-16 Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application Peretti, Alessandro Amenta, Francesco Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow Nittari, Giulio Mahdi, Syed Sarosh JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol Review BACKGROUND: Telemedicine applications have been increasing due to the development of new computer science technologies and of more advanced telemedical devices. Various types of telerehabilitation treatments and their relative intensities and duration have been reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the rehabilitation techniques for remote sites (telerehabilitation) and their fields of application, with analysis of the benefits and the drawbacks related to use. We discuss future applications of telerehabilitation techniques with an emphasis on the development of high-tech devices, and on which new tools and applications can be used in the future. METHODS: We retrieved relevant information and data on telerehabilitation from books, articles and online materials using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) “telerehabilitation,” “telemedicine,” and “rehabilitation,” as well as “disabling pathologies.” RESULTS: Telerehabilitation can be considered as a branch of telemedicine. Although this field is considerably new, its use has rapidly grown in developed countries. In general, telerehabilitation reduces the costs of both health care providers and patients compared with traditional inpatient or person-to-person rehabilitation. Furthermore, patients who live in remote places, where traditional rehabilitation services may not be easily accessible, can benefit from this technology. However, certain disadvantages of telerehabilitation, including skepticism on the part of patients due to remote interaction with their physicians or rehabilitators, should not be underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: This review evaluated different application fields of telerehabilitation, highlighting its benefits and drawbacks. This study may be a starting point for improving approaches and devices for telerehabilitation. In this context, patients’ feedback may be important to adapt rehabilitation techniques and approaches to their needs, which would subsequently help to improve the quality of rehabilitation in the future. The need for proper training and education of people involved in this new and emerging form of intervention for more effective treatment can’t be overstated. JMIR Publications 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5544892/ /pubmed/28733271 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.7511 Text en ©Alessandro Peretti, Francesco Amenta, Seyed Khosrow Tayebati, Giulio Nittari, Syed Sarosh Mahdi. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 21.07.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Peretti, Alessandro
Amenta, Francesco
Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow
Nittari, Giulio
Mahdi, Syed Sarosh
Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application
title Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application
title_full Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application
title_fullStr Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application
title_full_unstemmed Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application
title_short Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application
title_sort telerehabilitation: review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733271
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.7511
work_keys_str_mv AT perettialessandro telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication
AT amentafrancesco telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication
AT tayebatiseyedkhosrow telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication
AT nittarigiulio telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication
AT mahdisyedsarosh telerehabilitationreviewofthestateoftheartandareasofapplication