Cargando…

Differential gene expression in tomato fruit and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during colonization of the RNAi–SlPH tomato line with reduced fruit acidity and higher pH

BACKGROUND: The destructive phytopathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causes anthracnose disease in fruit. During host colonization, it secretes ammonia, which modulates environmental pH and regulates gene expression, contributing to pathogenicity. However, the effect of host pH environment on pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barad, Shiri, Sela, Noa, Dubey, Amit K., Kumar, Dilip, Luria, Neta, Ment, Dana, Cohen, Shahar, Schaffer, Arthur A., Prusky, Dov
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28778147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3961-6
_version_ 1783255351318020096
author Barad, Shiri
Sela, Noa
Dubey, Amit K.
Kumar, Dilip
Luria, Neta
Ment, Dana
Cohen, Shahar
Schaffer, Arthur A.
Prusky, Dov
author_facet Barad, Shiri
Sela, Noa
Dubey, Amit K.
Kumar, Dilip
Luria, Neta
Ment, Dana
Cohen, Shahar
Schaffer, Arthur A.
Prusky, Dov
author_sort Barad, Shiri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The destructive phytopathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causes anthracnose disease in fruit. During host colonization, it secretes ammonia, which modulates environmental pH and regulates gene expression, contributing to pathogenicity. However, the effect of host pH environment on pathogen colonization has never been evaluated. Development of an isogenic tomato line with reduced expression of the gene for acidity, SlPH (Solyc10g074790.1.1), enabled this analysis. Total RNA from C. gloeosporioides colonizing wild-type (WT) and RNAi–SlPH tomato lines was sequenced and gene-expression patterns were compared. RESULTS: C. gloeosporioides inoculation of the RNAi–SlPH line with pH 5.96 compared to the WT line with pH 4.2 showed 30% higher colonization and reduced ammonia accumulation. Large-scale comparative transcriptome analysis of the colonized RNAi–SlPH and WT lines revealed their different mechanisms of colonization-pattern activation: whereas the WT tomato upregulated 13-LOX (lipoxygenase), jasmonic acid and glutamate biosynthesis pathways, it downregulated processes related to chlorogenic acid biosynthesis II, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and hydroxycinnamic acid tyramine amide biosynthesis; the RNAi–SlPH line upregulated UDP-D-galacturonate biosynthesis I and free phenylpropanoid acid biosynthesis, but mainly downregulated pathways related to sugar metabolism, such as the glyoxylate cycle and L-arabinose degradation II. Comparison of C. gloeosporioides gene expression during colonization of the WT and RNAi–SlPH lines showed that the fungus upregulates ammonia and nitrogen transport and the gamma-aminobutyric acid metabolic process during colonization of the WT, while on the RNAi–SlPH tomato, it mainly upregulates the nitrate metabolic process. CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of tomato acidity and pH had significant phenotypic effects on C. gloeosporioides development. The fungus showed increased colonization on the neutral RNAi–SlPH fruit, and limited colonization on the WT acidic fruit. The change in environmental pH resulted in different defense responses for the two tomato lines. Interestingly, the WT line showed upregulation of jasmonate pathways and glutamate accumulation, supporting the reduced symptom development and increased ammonia accumulation, as the fungus might utilize glutamate to accumulate ammonia and increase environmental pH for better expression of pathogenicity factors. This was not found in the RNAi–SlPH line which downregulated sugar metabolism and upregulated the phenylpropanoid pathway, leading to host susceptibility. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3961-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5545021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55450212017-08-07 Differential gene expression in tomato fruit and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during colonization of the RNAi–SlPH tomato line with reduced fruit acidity and higher pH Barad, Shiri Sela, Noa Dubey, Amit K. Kumar, Dilip Luria, Neta Ment, Dana Cohen, Shahar Schaffer, Arthur A. Prusky, Dov BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: The destructive phytopathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causes anthracnose disease in fruit. During host colonization, it secretes ammonia, which modulates environmental pH and regulates gene expression, contributing to pathogenicity. However, the effect of host pH environment on pathogen colonization has never been evaluated. Development of an isogenic tomato line with reduced expression of the gene for acidity, SlPH (Solyc10g074790.1.1), enabled this analysis. Total RNA from C. gloeosporioides colonizing wild-type (WT) and RNAi–SlPH tomato lines was sequenced and gene-expression patterns were compared. RESULTS: C. gloeosporioides inoculation of the RNAi–SlPH line with pH 5.96 compared to the WT line with pH 4.2 showed 30% higher colonization and reduced ammonia accumulation. Large-scale comparative transcriptome analysis of the colonized RNAi–SlPH and WT lines revealed their different mechanisms of colonization-pattern activation: whereas the WT tomato upregulated 13-LOX (lipoxygenase), jasmonic acid and glutamate biosynthesis pathways, it downregulated processes related to chlorogenic acid biosynthesis II, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and hydroxycinnamic acid tyramine amide biosynthesis; the RNAi–SlPH line upregulated UDP-D-galacturonate biosynthesis I and free phenylpropanoid acid biosynthesis, but mainly downregulated pathways related to sugar metabolism, such as the glyoxylate cycle and L-arabinose degradation II. Comparison of C. gloeosporioides gene expression during colonization of the WT and RNAi–SlPH lines showed that the fungus upregulates ammonia and nitrogen transport and the gamma-aminobutyric acid metabolic process during colonization of the WT, while on the RNAi–SlPH tomato, it mainly upregulates the nitrate metabolic process. CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of tomato acidity and pH had significant phenotypic effects on C. gloeosporioides development. The fungus showed increased colonization on the neutral RNAi–SlPH fruit, and limited colonization on the WT acidic fruit. The change in environmental pH resulted in different defense responses for the two tomato lines. Interestingly, the WT line showed upregulation of jasmonate pathways and glutamate accumulation, supporting the reduced symptom development and increased ammonia accumulation, as the fungus might utilize glutamate to accumulate ammonia and increase environmental pH for better expression of pathogenicity factors. This was not found in the RNAi–SlPH line which downregulated sugar metabolism and upregulated the phenylpropanoid pathway, leading to host susceptibility. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3961-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5545021/ /pubmed/28778147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3961-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Barad, Shiri
Sela, Noa
Dubey, Amit K.
Kumar, Dilip
Luria, Neta
Ment, Dana
Cohen, Shahar
Schaffer, Arthur A.
Prusky, Dov
Differential gene expression in tomato fruit and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during colonization of the RNAi–SlPH tomato line with reduced fruit acidity and higher pH
title Differential gene expression in tomato fruit and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during colonization of the RNAi–SlPH tomato line with reduced fruit acidity and higher pH
title_full Differential gene expression in tomato fruit and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during colonization of the RNAi–SlPH tomato line with reduced fruit acidity and higher pH
title_fullStr Differential gene expression in tomato fruit and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during colonization of the RNAi–SlPH tomato line with reduced fruit acidity and higher pH
title_full_unstemmed Differential gene expression in tomato fruit and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during colonization of the RNAi–SlPH tomato line with reduced fruit acidity and higher pH
title_short Differential gene expression in tomato fruit and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during colonization of the RNAi–SlPH tomato line with reduced fruit acidity and higher pH
title_sort differential gene expression in tomato fruit and colletotrichum gloeosporioides during colonization of the rnai–slph tomato line with reduced fruit acidity and higher ph
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28778147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3961-6
work_keys_str_mv AT baradshiri differentialgeneexpressionintomatofruitandcolletotrichumgloeosporioidesduringcolonizationofthernaislphtomatolinewithreducedfruitacidityandhigherph
AT selanoa differentialgeneexpressionintomatofruitandcolletotrichumgloeosporioidesduringcolonizationofthernaislphtomatolinewithreducedfruitacidityandhigherph
AT dubeyamitk differentialgeneexpressionintomatofruitandcolletotrichumgloeosporioidesduringcolonizationofthernaislphtomatolinewithreducedfruitacidityandhigherph
AT kumardilip differentialgeneexpressionintomatofruitandcolletotrichumgloeosporioidesduringcolonizationofthernaislphtomatolinewithreducedfruitacidityandhigherph
AT lurianeta differentialgeneexpressionintomatofruitandcolletotrichumgloeosporioidesduringcolonizationofthernaislphtomatolinewithreducedfruitacidityandhigherph
AT mentdana differentialgeneexpressionintomatofruitandcolletotrichumgloeosporioidesduringcolonizationofthernaislphtomatolinewithreducedfruitacidityandhigherph
AT cohenshahar differentialgeneexpressionintomatofruitandcolletotrichumgloeosporioidesduringcolonizationofthernaislphtomatolinewithreducedfruitacidityandhigherph
AT schafferarthura differentialgeneexpressionintomatofruitandcolletotrichumgloeosporioidesduringcolonizationofthernaislphtomatolinewithreducedfruitacidityandhigherph
AT pruskydov differentialgeneexpressionintomatofruitandcolletotrichumgloeosporioidesduringcolonizationofthernaislphtomatolinewithreducedfruitacidityandhigherph