Cargando…
Interruption of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a single-center survey
BACKGROUND: Interruption of enteral nutrition (EN) in the intensive care unit (ICU) occurs frequently for various reasons including feeding intolerance and the conduct of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. However, few studies have investigated the details of EN interruption practices including...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28794882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0245-9 |
_version_ | 1783255354536099840 |
---|---|
author | Uozumi, Midori Sanui, Masamitsu Komuro, Tetsuya Iizuka, Yusuke Kamio, Tadashi Koyama, Hiroshi Mouri, Hideyuki Masuyama, Tomoyuki Ono, Kazuyuki Lefor, Alan Kawarai |
author_facet | Uozumi, Midori Sanui, Masamitsu Komuro, Tetsuya Iizuka, Yusuke Kamio, Tadashi Koyama, Hiroshi Mouri, Hideyuki Masuyama, Tomoyuki Ono, Kazuyuki Lefor, Alan Kawarai |
author_sort | Uozumi, Midori |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Interruption of enteral nutrition (EN) in the intensive care unit (ICU) occurs frequently for various reasons including feeding intolerance and the conduct of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. However, few studies have investigated the details of EN interruption practices including reasons for and duration of interruptions. There is no standard protocol to minimize EN interruptions. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 100 patients in the ICU staying more than 72 h and receiving EN in a 12-bed, medical/surgical ICU in a tertiary care center in 2013. Data collected include total time designated for EN; the number of EN interruption episodes; reason for each interruption categorized as diagnostic study, therapeutic intervention, or gastrointestinal (GI) event, and their individual subcategories; duration of each interruption; and the presence of written orders for interruptions. RESULTS: One hundred patients staying in the ICU for at least 72 h and receiving EN were included. There were 567 episodes of EN interruption over a median ICU length of stay of 17.1 (interquartile range 8.0–22.0) days. There were a median of three EN interruption episodes per patient. EN interruption was performed for undetermined reasons (166 episodes, 29%), airway manipulation (103 episodes, 18%), GI events (78 episodes, 14%), and intermittent dialysis (71 episodes, 13%). Median duration of EN interruption in all patients was 5.5 (3.0–10.0) h. The cumulative interruption time corresponds to 19% of the total time designated for EN. Duration of EN interruption varied according to reason, including airway manipulation (9.0 [5.0–21.0] h), tracheostomy (9.5 [7.5–14.0] h), and GI events (6.5 [3.0–14.0] h). The average calorie deficits due to interruptions were 11.5% of daily target calories. Only 60 episodes (12%) had clear written orders for interruption. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this single-center retrospective chart review, interruption of EN in the ICU is frequent, reasons for and duration of interruption varied, and airway procedures are associated with a relatively longer duration of interruption. Documentation and orders were frequently missing. These results warrant development of a protocol for EN interruption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5545034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55450342017-08-09 Interruption of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a single-center survey Uozumi, Midori Sanui, Masamitsu Komuro, Tetsuya Iizuka, Yusuke Kamio, Tadashi Koyama, Hiroshi Mouri, Hideyuki Masuyama, Tomoyuki Ono, Kazuyuki Lefor, Alan Kawarai J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Interruption of enteral nutrition (EN) in the intensive care unit (ICU) occurs frequently for various reasons including feeding intolerance and the conduct of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. However, few studies have investigated the details of EN interruption practices including reasons for and duration of interruptions. There is no standard protocol to minimize EN interruptions. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 100 patients in the ICU staying more than 72 h and receiving EN in a 12-bed, medical/surgical ICU in a tertiary care center in 2013. Data collected include total time designated for EN; the number of EN interruption episodes; reason for each interruption categorized as diagnostic study, therapeutic intervention, or gastrointestinal (GI) event, and their individual subcategories; duration of each interruption; and the presence of written orders for interruptions. RESULTS: One hundred patients staying in the ICU for at least 72 h and receiving EN were included. There were 567 episodes of EN interruption over a median ICU length of stay of 17.1 (interquartile range 8.0–22.0) days. There were a median of three EN interruption episodes per patient. EN interruption was performed for undetermined reasons (166 episodes, 29%), airway manipulation (103 episodes, 18%), GI events (78 episodes, 14%), and intermittent dialysis (71 episodes, 13%). Median duration of EN interruption in all patients was 5.5 (3.0–10.0) h. The cumulative interruption time corresponds to 19% of the total time designated for EN. Duration of EN interruption varied according to reason, including airway manipulation (9.0 [5.0–21.0] h), tracheostomy (9.5 [7.5–14.0] h), and GI events (6.5 [3.0–14.0] h). The average calorie deficits due to interruptions were 11.5% of daily target calories. Only 60 episodes (12%) had clear written orders for interruption. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this single-center retrospective chart review, interruption of EN in the ICU is frequent, reasons for and duration of interruption varied, and airway procedures are associated with a relatively longer duration of interruption. Documentation and orders were frequently missing. These results warrant development of a protocol for EN interruption. BioMed Central 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5545034/ /pubmed/28794882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0245-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Uozumi, Midori Sanui, Masamitsu Komuro, Tetsuya Iizuka, Yusuke Kamio, Tadashi Koyama, Hiroshi Mouri, Hideyuki Masuyama, Tomoyuki Ono, Kazuyuki Lefor, Alan Kawarai Interruption of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a single-center survey |
title | Interruption of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a single-center survey |
title_full | Interruption of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a single-center survey |
title_fullStr | Interruption of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a single-center survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Interruption of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a single-center survey |
title_short | Interruption of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a single-center survey |
title_sort | interruption of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a single-center survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28794882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0245-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uozumimidori interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey AT sanuimasamitsu interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey AT komurotetsuya interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey AT iizukayusuke interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey AT kamiotadashi interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey AT koyamahiroshi interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey AT mourihideyuki interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey AT masuyamatomoyuki interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey AT onokazuyuki interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey AT leforalankawarai interruptionofenteralnutritionintheintensivecareunitasinglecentersurvey |