Cargando…

Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats

Vaccination against tuberculosis (TB) is prohibited in cattle or other species subjected to specific TB eradication campaigns, due to the interference that it may cause with the official diagnostic tests. However, immunization with a heat-inactivated (HI) Mycobacterium bovis vaccine via the oral rou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roy, Alvaro, Risalde, María A., Casal, Carmen, Romero, Beatriz, de Juan, Lucía, Menshawy, Ahmed M., Díez-Guerrier, Alberto, Juste, Ramon A., Garrido, Joseba M., Sevilla, Iker A., Gortázar, Christian, Domínguez, Lucas, Bezos, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824927
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00124
_version_ 1783255467678498816
author Roy, Alvaro
Risalde, María A.
Casal, Carmen
Romero, Beatriz
de Juan, Lucía
Menshawy, Ahmed M.
Díez-Guerrier, Alberto
Juste, Ramon A.
Garrido, Joseba M.
Sevilla, Iker A.
Gortázar, Christian
Domínguez, Lucas
Bezos, Javier
author_facet Roy, Alvaro
Risalde, María A.
Casal, Carmen
Romero, Beatriz
de Juan, Lucía
Menshawy, Ahmed M.
Díez-Guerrier, Alberto
Juste, Ramon A.
Garrido, Joseba M.
Sevilla, Iker A.
Gortázar, Christian
Domínguez, Lucas
Bezos, Javier
author_sort Roy, Alvaro
collection PubMed
description Vaccination against tuberculosis (TB) is prohibited in cattle or other species subjected to specific TB eradication campaigns, due to the interference that it may cause with the official diagnostic tests. However, immunization with a heat-inactivated (HI) Mycobacterium bovis vaccine via the oral route has been suggested to overcome this issue. In this study, the main goal was to assess the interference of the HI vaccine by different routes of administration using a previous vaccination and re-vaccination (boosting) protocol. TB-free kid goats were divided into three groups: oral (n = 16), intramuscular (IM; n = 16), and control (n = 16). Results showed that there was a significant difference in the percentage of animals positive to the single intradermal test (SIT) and blood based interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) caused by vaccination when performed in the IM group compared to the oral group (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, no positivity to the SIT or IGRA test was observed in orally vaccinated goats regardless of the different interpretation criteria applied. None of the groups presented positive antibody titers using an in-house ELISA and samples collected 2 months after the boost. These results suggest the potential usefulness of the HI vaccine by the oral route in goats to minimize the interference on diagnostic tests (skin and IGRA tests) and reducing the necessity of defined antigens to replace the traditional purified protein derivatives for diagnosis. Finally, the results pave the way to future efficacy studies in goats using different routes of HI vaccination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5545688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55456882017-08-18 Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats Roy, Alvaro Risalde, María A. Casal, Carmen Romero, Beatriz de Juan, Lucía Menshawy, Ahmed M. Díez-Guerrier, Alberto Juste, Ramon A. Garrido, Joseba M. Sevilla, Iker A. Gortázar, Christian Domínguez, Lucas Bezos, Javier Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Vaccination against tuberculosis (TB) is prohibited in cattle or other species subjected to specific TB eradication campaigns, due to the interference that it may cause with the official diagnostic tests. However, immunization with a heat-inactivated (HI) Mycobacterium bovis vaccine via the oral route has been suggested to overcome this issue. In this study, the main goal was to assess the interference of the HI vaccine by different routes of administration using a previous vaccination and re-vaccination (boosting) protocol. TB-free kid goats were divided into three groups: oral (n = 16), intramuscular (IM; n = 16), and control (n = 16). Results showed that there was a significant difference in the percentage of animals positive to the single intradermal test (SIT) and blood based interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) caused by vaccination when performed in the IM group compared to the oral group (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, no positivity to the SIT or IGRA test was observed in orally vaccinated goats regardless of the different interpretation criteria applied. None of the groups presented positive antibody titers using an in-house ELISA and samples collected 2 months after the boost. These results suggest the potential usefulness of the HI vaccine by the oral route in goats to minimize the interference on diagnostic tests (skin and IGRA tests) and reducing the necessity of defined antigens to replace the traditional purified protein derivatives for diagnosis. Finally, the results pave the way to future efficacy studies in goats using different routes of HI vaccination. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5545688/ /pubmed/28824927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00124 Text en Copyright © 2017 Roy, Risalde, Casal, Romero, de Juan, Menshawy, Díez-Guerrier, Juste, Garrido, Sevilla, Gortázar, Domínguez and Bezos. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Roy, Alvaro
Risalde, María A.
Casal, Carmen
Romero, Beatriz
de Juan, Lucía
Menshawy, Ahmed M.
Díez-Guerrier, Alberto
Juste, Ramon A.
Garrido, Joseba M.
Sevilla, Iker A.
Gortázar, Christian
Domínguez, Lucas
Bezos, Javier
Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats
title Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats
title_full Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats
title_fullStr Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats
title_full_unstemmed Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats
title_short Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats
title_sort oral vaccination with heat-inactivated mycobacterium bovis does not interfere with the antemortem diagnostic techniques for tuberculosis in goats
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824927
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00124
work_keys_str_mv AT royalvaro oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT risaldemariaa oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT casalcarmen oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT romerobeatriz oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT dejuanlucia oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT menshawyahmedm oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT diezguerrieralberto oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT justeramona oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT garridojosebam oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT sevillaikera oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT gortazarchristian oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT dominguezlucas oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats
AT bezosjavier oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats