Cargando…
Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats
Vaccination against tuberculosis (TB) is prohibited in cattle or other species subjected to specific TB eradication campaigns, due to the interference that it may cause with the official diagnostic tests. However, immunization with a heat-inactivated (HI) Mycobacterium bovis vaccine via the oral rou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00124 |
_version_ | 1783255467678498816 |
---|---|
author | Roy, Alvaro Risalde, María A. Casal, Carmen Romero, Beatriz de Juan, Lucía Menshawy, Ahmed M. Díez-Guerrier, Alberto Juste, Ramon A. Garrido, Joseba M. Sevilla, Iker A. Gortázar, Christian Domínguez, Lucas Bezos, Javier |
author_facet | Roy, Alvaro Risalde, María A. Casal, Carmen Romero, Beatriz de Juan, Lucía Menshawy, Ahmed M. Díez-Guerrier, Alberto Juste, Ramon A. Garrido, Joseba M. Sevilla, Iker A. Gortázar, Christian Domínguez, Lucas Bezos, Javier |
author_sort | Roy, Alvaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vaccination against tuberculosis (TB) is prohibited in cattle or other species subjected to specific TB eradication campaigns, due to the interference that it may cause with the official diagnostic tests. However, immunization with a heat-inactivated (HI) Mycobacterium bovis vaccine via the oral route has been suggested to overcome this issue. In this study, the main goal was to assess the interference of the HI vaccine by different routes of administration using a previous vaccination and re-vaccination (boosting) protocol. TB-free kid goats were divided into three groups: oral (n = 16), intramuscular (IM; n = 16), and control (n = 16). Results showed that there was a significant difference in the percentage of animals positive to the single intradermal test (SIT) and blood based interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) caused by vaccination when performed in the IM group compared to the oral group (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, no positivity to the SIT or IGRA test was observed in orally vaccinated goats regardless of the different interpretation criteria applied. None of the groups presented positive antibody titers using an in-house ELISA and samples collected 2 months after the boost. These results suggest the potential usefulness of the HI vaccine by the oral route in goats to minimize the interference on diagnostic tests (skin and IGRA tests) and reducing the necessity of defined antigens to replace the traditional purified protein derivatives for diagnosis. Finally, the results pave the way to future efficacy studies in goats using different routes of HI vaccination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5545688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55456882017-08-18 Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats Roy, Alvaro Risalde, María A. Casal, Carmen Romero, Beatriz de Juan, Lucía Menshawy, Ahmed M. Díez-Guerrier, Alberto Juste, Ramon A. Garrido, Joseba M. Sevilla, Iker A. Gortázar, Christian Domínguez, Lucas Bezos, Javier Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Vaccination against tuberculosis (TB) is prohibited in cattle or other species subjected to specific TB eradication campaigns, due to the interference that it may cause with the official diagnostic tests. However, immunization with a heat-inactivated (HI) Mycobacterium bovis vaccine via the oral route has been suggested to overcome this issue. In this study, the main goal was to assess the interference of the HI vaccine by different routes of administration using a previous vaccination and re-vaccination (boosting) protocol. TB-free kid goats were divided into three groups: oral (n = 16), intramuscular (IM; n = 16), and control (n = 16). Results showed that there was a significant difference in the percentage of animals positive to the single intradermal test (SIT) and blood based interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) caused by vaccination when performed in the IM group compared to the oral group (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, no positivity to the SIT or IGRA test was observed in orally vaccinated goats regardless of the different interpretation criteria applied. None of the groups presented positive antibody titers using an in-house ELISA and samples collected 2 months after the boost. These results suggest the potential usefulness of the HI vaccine by the oral route in goats to minimize the interference on diagnostic tests (skin and IGRA tests) and reducing the necessity of defined antigens to replace the traditional purified protein derivatives for diagnosis. Finally, the results pave the way to future efficacy studies in goats using different routes of HI vaccination. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5545688/ /pubmed/28824927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00124 Text en Copyright © 2017 Roy, Risalde, Casal, Romero, de Juan, Menshawy, Díez-Guerrier, Juste, Garrido, Sevilla, Gortázar, Domínguez and Bezos. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Roy, Alvaro Risalde, María A. Casal, Carmen Romero, Beatriz de Juan, Lucía Menshawy, Ahmed M. Díez-Guerrier, Alberto Juste, Ramon A. Garrido, Joseba M. Sevilla, Iker A. Gortázar, Christian Domínguez, Lucas Bezos, Javier Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats |
title | Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats |
title_full | Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats |
title_fullStr | Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats |
title_short | Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats |
title_sort | oral vaccination with heat-inactivated mycobacterium bovis does not interfere with the antemortem diagnostic techniques for tuberculosis in goats |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT royalvaro oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT risaldemariaa oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT casalcarmen oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT romerobeatriz oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT dejuanlucia oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT menshawyahmedm oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT diezguerrieralberto oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT justeramona oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT garridojosebam oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT sevillaikera oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT gortazarchristian oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT dominguezlucas oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats AT bezosjavier oralvaccinationwithheatinactivatedmycobacteriumbovisdoesnotinterferewiththeantemortemdiagnostictechniquesfortuberculosisingoats |