Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVES: Nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery is frequently used to control postoperative bleeding, enhance the wound healing process, and prevent lateralization of the middle turbinate, which causes insufficient ventilation. Many biodegradable materials have been developed to reduce pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Byungjin, Kim, Jeong-Rok, Shin, Jae-Min, Park, Il-Ho, Lee, Heung-Man
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927009
http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2016.01081
_version_ 1783255471498461184
author Kang, Byungjin
Kim, Jeong-Rok
Shin, Jae-Min
Park, Il-Ho
Lee, Heung-Man
author_facet Kang, Byungjin
Kim, Jeong-Rok
Shin, Jae-Min
Park, Il-Ho
Lee, Heung-Man
author_sort Kang, Byungjin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery is frequently used to control postoperative bleeding, enhance the wound healing process, and prevent lateralization of the middle turbinate, which causes insufficient ventilation. Many biodegradable materials have been developed to reduce pain and mucosal damage during packing removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Guardcel (Genewel Co.) middle meatal packing with a traditional nonabsorbable middle meatal packing, Merocel (Medtronic Xomed), on wound healing and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study, we enrolled 32 consecutive patients (64 nostrils) undergoing bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery at Korea University Guro Hospital from February 2015 to August 2015. Guardcel and Merocel were inserted postoperatively into a randomly assigned side. Objective findings about bleeding, hemostasis, adhesion, and infection were evaluated with nasal endoscopy. Patients’ symptoms including pain and nasal obstruction were evaluated with a visual analog scale. Each evaluation was done at 2–3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: At 2–3 days after endoscopic sinus surgery, the Guardcel side had a significantly less hemostasis time than the Merocel side (P=0.001). During this period, the pain during packing removal was significantly lower on the Guardcel-inserted side than the Merocel-inserted side (P=0.002). At two weeks after surgery, the adhesion score on the Guardcel side was significantly lower than that of the Merocel side (P=0.011). Other parameters during the study follow-up periods were not statistically significant. There were no severe adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: Guardcel, a newly developed packing material, appeared to shorten the hemostasis time and reduce pain sensation at 2–3 days after surgery; it also prevented adhesion formation 2 weeks after surgery when compared with the control. Guardcel can be an effective and safe candidate to replace conventional packing materials after endoscopic sinus surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5545704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55457042017-09-01 Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study Kang, Byungjin Kim, Jeong-Rok Shin, Jae-Min Park, Il-Ho Lee, Heung-Man Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery is frequently used to control postoperative bleeding, enhance the wound healing process, and prevent lateralization of the middle turbinate, which causes insufficient ventilation. Many biodegradable materials have been developed to reduce pain and mucosal damage during packing removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Guardcel (Genewel Co.) middle meatal packing with a traditional nonabsorbable middle meatal packing, Merocel (Medtronic Xomed), on wound healing and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study, we enrolled 32 consecutive patients (64 nostrils) undergoing bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery at Korea University Guro Hospital from February 2015 to August 2015. Guardcel and Merocel were inserted postoperatively into a randomly assigned side. Objective findings about bleeding, hemostasis, adhesion, and infection were evaluated with nasal endoscopy. Patients’ symptoms including pain and nasal obstruction were evaluated with a visual analog scale. Each evaluation was done at 2–3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: At 2–3 days after endoscopic sinus surgery, the Guardcel side had a significantly less hemostasis time than the Merocel side (P=0.001). During this period, the pain during packing removal was significantly lower on the Guardcel-inserted side than the Merocel-inserted side (P=0.002). At two weeks after surgery, the adhesion score on the Guardcel side was significantly lower than that of the Merocel side (P=0.011). Other parameters during the study follow-up periods were not statistically significant. There were no severe adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: Guardcel, a newly developed packing material, appeared to shorten the hemostasis time and reduce pain sensation at 2–3 days after surgery; it also prevented adhesion formation 2 weeks after surgery when compared with the control. Guardcel can be an effective and safe candidate to replace conventional packing materials after endoscopic sinus surgery. Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2017-09 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5545704/ /pubmed/27927009 http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2016.01081 Text en Copyright © 2017 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kang, Byungjin
Kim, Jeong-Rok
Shin, Jae-Min
Park, Il-Ho
Lee, Heung-Man
Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort efficacy and safety of guardcel nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927009
http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2016.01081
work_keys_str_mv AT kangbyungjin efficacyandsafetyofguardcelnasalpackingafterendoscopicsinussurgeryaprospectivesingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kimjeongrok efficacyandsafetyofguardcelnasalpackingafterendoscopicsinussurgeryaprospectivesingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT shinjaemin efficacyandsafetyofguardcelnasalpackingafterendoscopicsinussurgeryaprospectivesingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT parkilho efficacyandsafetyofguardcelnasalpackingafterendoscopicsinussurgeryaprospectivesingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT leeheungman efficacyandsafetyofguardcelnasalpackingafterendoscopicsinussurgeryaprospectivesingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy