Cargando…
A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a patient-centred approach in which clinicians and patients work side-by-side to decide together on the best course of action for each patient’s particular situation. Six key elements of SDM can be distinguished: situation diagnosis, choice awareness, opti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28784186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9 |
_version_ | 1783255499675795456 |
---|---|
author | Wieringa, Thomas H. Kunneman, Marleen Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene Montori, Victor M. de Wit, Maartje Smets, Ellen M. A. Schoonmade, Linda J. Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela Snoek, Frank J. |
author_facet | Wieringa, Thomas H. Kunneman, Marleen Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene Montori, Victor M. de Wit, Maartje Smets, Ellen M. A. Schoonmade, Linda J. Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela Snoek, Frank J. |
author_sort | Wieringa, Thomas H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a patient-centred approach in which clinicians and patients work side-by-side to decide together on the best course of action for each patient’s particular situation. Six key elements of SDM can be distinguished: situation diagnosis, choice awareness, option clarification, discussion of harms and benefits, deliberation of patient preferences and making the decision. Decision aids (DAs) are tools that facilitate SDM. The impact of DAs for chronic illnesses on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: We will perform a systematic review aiming to describe (a) which SDM elements are incorporated in DAs for adult patients with chronic conditions and (b) the effects of DA use on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes. This manuscript reports on the protocol for this systematic review. The following databases will be searched for relevant articles: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO, from their inception to October 2016. We will ascertain ongoing research by querying experts and searching trial registries. To enhance feasibility, we will limit the review to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients with chronic cardiovascular and/or respiratory diseases and/or diabetes. SDM elements incorporated in DAs, DA effects and DA itself will be described. DISCUSSION: This study will characterize DAs for chronic illness and will provide an overview of their effects on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes. We anticipate this review will bring to light knowledge gaps and inform further research into the design and use of DAs for patients with chronic conditions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016050320. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5545866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55458662017-08-09 A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol Wieringa, Thomas H. Kunneman, Marleen Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene Montori, Victor M. de Wit, Maartje Smets, Ellen M. A. Schoonmade, Linda J. Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela Snoek, Frank J. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a patient-centred approach in which clinicians and patients work side-by-side to decide together on the best course of action for each patient’s particular situation. Six key elements of SDM can be distinguished: situation diagnosis, choice awareness, option clarification, discussion of harms and benefits, deliberation of patient preferences and making the decision. Decision aids (DAs) are tools that facilitate SDM. The impact of DAs for chronic illnesses on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: We will perform a systematic review aiming to describe (a) which SDM elements are incorporated in DAs for adult patients with chronic conditions and (b) the effects of DA use on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes. This manuscript reports on the protocol for this systematic review. The following databases will be searched for relevant articles: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO, from their inception to October 2016. We will ascertain ongoing research by querying experts and searching trial registries. To enhance feasibility, we will limit the review to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients with chronic cardiovascular and/or respiratory diseases and/or diabetes. SDM elements incorporated in DAs, DA effects and DA itself will be described. DISCUSSION: This study will characterize DAs for chronic illness and will provide an overview of their effects on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes. We anticipate this review will bring to light knowledge gaps and inform further research into the design and use of DAs for patients with chronic conditions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016050320. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5545866/ /pubmed/28784186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Wieringa, Thomas H. Kunneman, Marleen Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene Montori, Victor M. de Wit, Maartje Smets, Ellen M. A. Schoonmade, Linda J. Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela Snoek, Frank J. A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol |
title | A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol |
title_full | A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol |
title_short | A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol |
title_sort | systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28784186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wieringathomash asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT kunnemanmarleen asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT rodriguezgutierrezrene asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT montorivictorm asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT dewitmaartje asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT smetsellenma asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT schoonmadelindaj asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT spencerbonillagabriela asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT snoekfrankj asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT wieringathomash systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT kunnemanmarleen systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT rodriguezgutierrezrene systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT montorivictorm systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT dewitmaartje systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT smetsellenma systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT schoonmadelindaj systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT spencerbonillagabriela systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol AT snoekfrankj systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol |