Cargando…

A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a patient-centred approach in which clinicians and patients work side-by-side to decide together on the best course of action for each patient’s particular situation. Six key elements of SDM can be distinguished: situation diagnosis, choice awareness, opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wieringa, Thomas H., Kunneman, Marleen, Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene, Montori, Victor M., de Wit, Maartje, Smets, Ellen M. A., Schoonmade, Linda J., Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela, Snoek, Frank J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28784186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9
_version_ 1783255499675795456
author Wieringa, Thomas H.
Kunneman, Marleen
Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
Montori, Victor M.
de Wit, Maartje
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Schoonmade, Linda J.
Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
Snoek, Frank J.
author_facet Wieringa, Thomas H.
Kunneman, Marleen
Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
Montori, Victor M.
de Wit, Maartje
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Schoonmade, Linda J.
Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
Snoek, Frank J.
author_sort Wieringa, Thomas H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a patient-centred approach in which clinicians and patients work side-by-side to decide together on the best course of action for each patient’s particular situation. Six key elements of SDM can be distinguished: situation diagnosis, choice awareness, option clarification, discussion of harms and benefits, deliberation of patient preferences and making the decision. Decision aids (DAs) are tools that facilitate SDM. The impact of DAs for chronic illnesses on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: We will perform a systematic review aiming to describe (a) which SDM elements are incorporated in DAs for adult patients with chronic conditions and (b) the effects of DA use on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes. This manuscript reports on the protocol for this systematic review. The following databases will be searched for relevant articles: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO, from their inception to October 2016. We will ascertain ongoing research by querying experts and searching trial registries. To enhance feasibility, we will limit the review to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients with chronic cardiovascular and/or respiratory diseases and/or diabetes. SDM elements incorporated in DAs, DA effects and DA itself will be described. DISCUSSION: This study will characterize DAs for chronic illness and will provide an overview of their effects on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes. We anticipate this review will bring to light knowledge gaps and inform further research into the design and use of DAs for patients with chronic conditions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016050320. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5545866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55458662017-08-09 A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol Wieringa, Thomas H. Kunneman, Marleen Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene Montori, Victor M. de Wit, Maartje Smets, Ellen M. A. Schoonmade, Linda J. Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela Snoek, Frank J. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a patient-centred approach in which clinicians and patients work side-by-side to decide together on the best course of action for each patient’s particular situation. Six key elements of SDM can be distinguished: situation diagnosis, choice awareness, option clarification, discussion of harms and benefits, deliberation of patient preferences and making the decision. Decision aids (DAs) are tools that facilitate SDM. The impact of DAs for chronic illnesses on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: We will perform a systematic review aiming to describe (a) which SDM elements are incorporated in DAs for adult patients with chronic conditions and (b) the effects of DA use on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes. This manuscript reports on the protocol for this systematic review. The following databases will be searched for relevant articles: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO, from their inception to October 2016. We will ascertain ongoing research by querying experts and searching trial registries. To enhance feasibility, we will limit the review to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients with chronic cardiovascular and/or respiratory diseases and/or diabetes. SDM elements incorporated in DAs, DA effects and DA itself will be described. DISCUSSION: This study will characterize DAs for chronic illness and will provide an overview of their effects on SDM, clinical and patient reported outcomes. We anticipate this review will bring to light knowledge gaps and inform further research into the design and use of DAs for patients with chronic conditions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016050320. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5545866/ /pubmed/28784186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Wieringa, Thomas H.
Kunneman, Marleen
Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
Montori, Victor M.
de Wit, Maartje
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Schoonmade, Linda J.
Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
Snoek, Frank J.
A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
title A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
title_full A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
title_fullStr A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
title_short A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
title_sort systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28784186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wieringathomash asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT kunnemanmarleen asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT rodriguezgutierrezrene asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT montorivictorm asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT dewitmaartje asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT smetsellenma asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT schoonmadelindaj asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT spencerbonillagabriela asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT snoekfrankj asystematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT wieringathomash systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT kunnemanmarleen systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT rodriguezgutierrezrene systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT montorivictorm systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT dewitmaartje systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT smetsellenma systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT schoonmadelindaj systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT spencerbonillagabriela systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol
AT snoekfrankj systematicreviewofdecisionaidsthatfacilitateelementsofshareddecisionmakinginchronicillnessesareviewprotocol