Cargando…
The lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for node-positive triple-negative breast cancer
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with axillary lymph node-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: The prognostic efficacy was investigated in the first cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) da...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28496004 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17413 |
_version_ | 1783255568055533568 |
---|---|
author | He, Min Zhang, Jia-Xin Jiang, Yi-Zhou Chen, Ying-Le Yang, Hai-Yuan Tang, Li-Chen Shao, Zhi-Ming Di, Gen-Hong |
author_facet | He, Min Zhang, Jia-Xin Jiang, Yi-Zhou Chen, Ying-Le Yang, Hai-Yuan Tang, Li-Chen Shao, Zhi-Ming Di, Gen-Hong |
author_sort | He, Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with axillary lymph node-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: The prognostic efficacy was investigated in the first cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset (n=4114) and was further validated in an independent cohort from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (n=417). Patients were classified into low-, medium- and high-risk LNR groups. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that the LNR was an independent predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) for high-risk LNR: 3.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.56 to 4.09) and breast cancer-specific survival (HR for high-risk LNR: 3.57; 95% CI: 2.76 to 4.62) in the SEER population and also for disease-free survival (HR for high-risk LNR: 4.29; 95% CI: 2.24-8.21) in the validation population. Subgroup analysis revealed that patient classification according to the LNR could discriminate among groups of patients with different survival rates based on pathological nodal (pN) staging. CONCLUSION: The LNR shows potential for use as an additional prognostic factor for TNBC patients with positive lymph node involvement. Considering the heterogeneity of TNBC, use of the LNR might allow for optimization of the pN staging system and should be considered when making treatment decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5546527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55465272017-08-23 The lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for node-positive triple-negative breast cancer He, Min Zhang, Jia-Xin Jiang, Yi-Zhou Chen, Ying-Le Yang, Hai-Yuan Tang, Li-Chen Shao, Zhi-Ming Di, Gen-Hong Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with axillary lymph node-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: The prognostic efficacy was investigated in the first cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset (n=4114) and was further validated in an independent cohort from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (n=417). Patients were classified into low-, medium- and high-risk LNR groups. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that the LNR was an independent predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) for high-risk LNR: 3.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.56 to 4.09) and breast cancer-specific survival (HR for high-risk LNR: 3.57; 95% CI: 2.76 to 4.62) in the SEER population and also for disease-free survival (HR for high-risk LNR: 4.29; 95% CI: 2.24-8.21) in the validation population. Subgroup analysis revealed that patient classification according to the LNR could discriminate among groups of patients with different survival rates based on pathological nodal (pN) staging. CONCLUSION: The LNR shows potential for use as an additional prognostic factor for TNBC patients with positive lymph node involvement. Considering the heterogeneity of TNBC, use of the LNR might allow for optimization of the pN staging system and should be considered when making treatment decisions. Impact Journals LLC 2017-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5546527/ /pubmed/28496004 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17413 Text en Copyright: © 2017 He et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper He, Min Zhang, Jia-Xin Jiang, Yi-Zhou Chen, Ying-Le Yang, Hai-Yuan Tang, Li-Chen Shao, Zhi-Ming Di, Gen-Hong The lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for node-positive triple-negative breast cancer |
title | The lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for node-positive triple-negative breast cancer |
title_full | The lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for node-positive triple-negative breast cancer |
title_fullStr | The lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for node-positive triple-negative breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for node-positive triple-negative breast cancer |
title_short | The lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for node-positive triple-negative breast cancer |
title_sort | lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor for node-positive triple-negative breast cancer |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28496004 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17413 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hemin thelymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT zhangjiaxin thelymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT jiangyizhou thelymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT chenyingle thelymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT yanghaiyuan thelymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT tanglichen thelymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT shaozhiming thelymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT digenhong thelymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT hemin lymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT zhangjiaxin lymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT jiangyizhou lymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT chenyingle lymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT yanghaiyuan lymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT tanglichen lymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT shaozhiming lymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer AT digenhong lymphnoderatioasanindependentprognosticfactorfornodepositivetriplenegativebreastcancer |