Cargando…

Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification

BACKGROUND: Alternatively spliced transcript isoforms are commonly observed in higher eukaryotes. The expression levels of these isoforms are key for understanding normal functions in healthy tissues and the progression of disease states. However, accurate quantification of expression at the transcr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chi, Zhang, Baohong, Lin, Lih-Ling, Zhao, Shanrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5547501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28784092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4002-1
_version_ 1783255704403968000
author Zhang, Chi
Zhang, Baohong
Lin, Lih-Ling
Zhao, Shanrong
author_facet Zhang, Chi
Zhang, Baohong
Lin, Lih-Ling
Zhao, Shanrong
author_sort Zhang, Chi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alternatively spliced transcript isoforms are commonly observed in higher eukaryotes. The expression levels of these isoforms are key for understanding normal functions in healthy tissues and the progression of disease states. However, accurate quantification of expression at the transcript level is limited with current RNA-seq technologies because of, for example, limited read length and the cost of deep sequencing. RESULTS: A large number of tools have been developed to tackle this problem, and we performed a comprehensive evaluation of these tools using both experimental and simulated RNA-seq datasets. We found that recently developed alignment-free tools are both fast and accurate. The accuracy of all methods was mainly influenced by the complexity of gene structures and caution must be taken when interpreting quantification results for short transcripts. Using TP53 gene simulation, we discovered that both sequencing depth and the relative abundance of different isoforms affect quantification accuracy CONCLUSIONS: Our comprehensive evaluation helps data analysts to make informed choice when selecting computational tools for isoform quantification. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4002-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5547501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55475012017-08-09 Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification Zhang, Chi Zhang, Baohong Lin, Lih-Ling Zhao, Shanrong BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Alternatively spliced transcript isoforms are commonly observed in higher eukaryotes. The expression levels of these isoforms are key for understanding normal functions in healthy tissues and the progression of disease states. However, accurate quantification of expression at the transcript level is limited with current RNA-seq technologies because of, for example, limited read length and the cost of deep sequencing. RESULTS: A large number of tools have been developed to tackle this problem, and we performed a comprehensive evaluation of these tools using both experimental and simulated RNA-seq datasets. We found that recently developed alignment-free tools are both fast and accurate. The accuracy of all methods was mainly influenced by the complexity of gene structures and caution must be taken when interpreting quantification results for short transcripts. Using TP53 gene simulation, we discovered that both sequencing depth and the relative abundance of different isoforms affect quantification accuracy CONCLUSIONS: Our comprehensive evaluation helps data analysts to make informed choice when selecting computational tools for isoform quantification. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4002-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5547501/ /pubmed/28784092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4002-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Chi
Zhang, Baohong
Lin, Lih-Ling
Zhao, Shanrong
Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification
title Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification
title_full Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification
title_fullStr Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification
title_short Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification
title_sort evaluation and comparison of computational tools for rna-seq isoform quantification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5547501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28784092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4002-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchi evaluationandcomparisonofcomputationaltoolsforrnaseqisoformquantification
AT zhangbaohong evaluationandcomparisonofcomputationaltoolsforrnaseqisoformquantification
AT linlihling evaluationandcomparisonofcomputationaltoolsforrnaseqisoformquantification
AT zhaoshanrong evaluationandcomparisonofcomputationaltoolsforrnaseqisoformquantification