Cargando…

Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay

BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction-based Xpert human papillomavirus (HPV) assay is a rapid test that detects high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection. This point-of-care test is usually performed by collecting a cervical specimen in a vial of PreservCyt® transport medium. We compared HPV test positivity a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Catarino, Rosa, Vassilakos, Pierre, Bilancioni, Aline, Bougel, Stéphanie, Boukrid, Meriem, Meyer-Hamme, Ulrike, Petignat, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5547698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181905
_version_ 1783255719538065408
author Catarino, Rosa
Vassilakos, Pierre
Bilancioni, Aline
Bougel, Stéphanie
Boukrid, Meriem
Meyer-Hamme, Ulrike
Petignat, Patrick
author_facet Catarino, Rosa
Vassilakos, Pierre
Bilancioni, Aline
Bougel, Stéphanie
Boukrid, Meriem
Meyer-Hamme, Ulrike
Petignat, Patrick
author_sort Catarino, Rosa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction-based Xpert human papillomavirus (HPV) assay is a rapid test that detects high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection. This point-of-care test is usually performed by collecting a cervical specimen in a vial of PreservCyt® transport medium. We compared HPV test positivity and accuracy between self-collected sample with a dry swab (s-DRY) versus physician-collected cervical sampling using a broom like brush and immediate immersion in PreservCyt (dr-WET). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 150 women ≥ 18 years old attending the colposcopy clinic in the University Hospital of Geneva. Each participant first self-collected a vaginal sample using a dry swab and then the physician collected a cervical specimen in PreservCyt. HPV analysis was performed with Xpert. Part of the PreservCyt-collected sample was used for hrHPV detection with the cobas® HPV test. HPV test positivity and performance of the two collection methods was compared. RESULTS: HPV positivity was 49.1% for s-DRY, 41.8% for dr-WET and 46.2% for cobas. Good agreement was found between s-DRY and dr-WET samples (kappa±Standard error (SE) = 0.64±0.09,), particularly for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL+) (kappa±SE = 0.80±0.17). Excellent agreement was found between the two samples for HPV16 detection in general (kappa±SE = 0.91±0.09) and among LSIL+ lesions (kappa±SE = 1.00±0.17). Sensitivities and specificities were, respectively, 84.2% and 47.1%(s-DRY), 73.1% and 58.7%. (dr-WET) and 77.8% and 45.7% (cobas) for CIN2+ detection. The median delay between sampling and HPV analysis was 7 days for the Xpert HPV assay and 19 days for cobas. There were 36 (24.0%) invalid results among s-DRY samples and 4 (2.7%) among dr-WET (p = 0.001). Invalid results happened due to the long interval between collection and analysis. CONCLUSION: Self-collected vaginal dry swabs are a valid alternative to collecting cervical samples in PreservCyt solution for HPV testing with the Xpert HPV assay. IMPACT: HPV self-collection with dry cotton swabs might assist in the implementation of an effective screening strategy in developing countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry ISRCTN83050913
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5547698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55476982017-08-12 Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay Catarino, Rosa Vassilakos, Pierre Bilancioni, Aline Bougel, Stéphanie Boukrid, Meriem Meyer-Hamme, Ulrike Petignat, Patrick PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction-based Xpert human papillomavirus (HPV) assay is a rapid test that detects high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection. This point-of-care test is usually performed by collecting a cervical specimen in a vial of PreservCyt® transport medium. We compared HPV test positivity and accuracy between self-collected sample with a dry swab (s-DRY) versus physician-collected cervical sampling using a broom like brush and immediate immersion in PreservCyt (dr-WET). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 150 women ≥ 18 years old attending the colposcopy clinic in the University Hospital of Geneva. Each participant first self-collected a vaginal sample using a dry swab and then the physician collected a cervical specimen in PreservCyt. HPV analysis was performed with Xpert. Part of the PreservCyt-collected sample was used for hrHPV detection with the cobas® HPV test. HPV test positivity and performance of the two collection methods was compared. RESULTS: HPV positivity was 49.1% for s-DRY, 41.8% for dr-WET and 46.2% for cobas. Good agreement was found between s-DRY and dr-WET samples (kappa±Standard error (SE) = 0.64±0.09,), particularly for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL+) (kappa±SE = 0.80±0.17). Excellent agreement was found between the two samples for HPV16 detection in general (kappa±SE = 0.91±0.09) and among LSIL+ lesions (kappa±SE = 1.00±0.17). Sensitivities and specificities were, respectively, 84.2% and 47.1%(s-DRY), 73.1% and 58.7%. (dr-WET) and 77.8% and 45.7% (cobas) for CIN2+ detection. The median delay between sampling and HPV analysis was 7 days for the Xpert HPV assay and 19 days for cobas. There were 36 (24.0%) invalid results among s-DRY samples and 4 (2.7%) among dr-WET (p = 0.001). Invalid results happened due to the long interval between collection and analysis. CONCLUSION: Self-collected vaginal dry swabs are a valid alternative to collecting cervical samples in PreservCyt solution for HPV testing with the Xpert HPV assay. IMPACT: HPV self-collection with dry cotton swabs might assist in the implementation of an effective screening strategy in developing countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry ISRCTN83050913 Public Library of Science 2017-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5547698/ /pubmed/28750015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181905 Text en © 2017 Catarino et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Catarino, Rosa
Vassilakos, Pierre
Bilancioni, Aline
Bougel, Stéphanie
Boukrid, Meriem
Meyer-Hamme, Ulrike
Petignat, Patrick
Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay
title Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay
title_full Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay
title_fullStr Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay
title_short Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay
title_sort accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the xpert human papillomavirus assay
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5547698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181905
work_keys_str_mv AT catarinorosa accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay
AT vassilakospierre accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay
AT bilancionialine accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay
AT bougelstephanie accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay
AT boukridmeriem accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay
AT meyerhammeulrike accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay
AT petignatpatrick accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay