Cargando…
Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay
BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction-based Xpert human papillomavirus (HPV) assay is a rapid test that detects high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection. This point-of-care test is usually performed by collecting a cervical specimen in a vial of PreservCyt® transport medium. We compared HPV test positivity a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5547698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181905 |
_version_ | 1783255719538065408 |
---|---|
author | Catarino, Rosa Vassilakos, Pierre Bilancioni, Aline Bougel, Stéphanie Boukrid, Meriem Meyer-Hamme, Ulrike Petignat, Patrick |
author_facet | Catarino, Rosa Vassilakos, Pierre Bilancioni, Aline Bougel, Stéphanie Boukrid, Meriem Meyer-Hamme, Ulrike Petignat, Patrick |
author_sort | Catarino, Rosa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction-based Xpert human papillomavirus (HPV) assay is a rapid test that detects high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection. This point-of-care test is usually performed by collecting a cervical specimen in a vial of PreservCyt® transport medium. We compared HPV test positivity and accuracy between self-collected sample with a dry swab (s-DRY) versus physician-collected cervical sampling using a broom like brush and immediate immersion in PreservCyt (dr-WET). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 150 women ≥ 18 years old attending the colposcopy clinic in the University Hospital of Geneva. Each participant first self-collected a vaginal sample using a dry swab and then the physician collected a cervical specimen in PreservCyt. HPV analysis was performed with Xpert. Part of the PreservCyt-collected sample was used for hrHPV detection with the cobas® HPV test. HPV test positivity and performance of the two collection methods was compared. RESULTS: HPV positivity was 49.1% for s-DRY, 41.8% for dr-WET and 46.2% for cobas. Good agreement was found between s-DRY and dr-WET samples (kappa±Standard error (SE) = 0.64±0.09,), particularly for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL+) (kappa±SE = 0.80±0.17). Excellent agreement was found between the two samples for HPV16 detection in general (kappa±SE = 0.91±0.09) and among LSIL+ lesions (kappa±SE = 1.00±0.17). Sensitivities and specificities were, respectively, 84.2% and 47.1%(s-DRY), 73.1% and 58.7%. (dr-WET) and 77.8% and 45.7% (cobas) for CIN2+ detection. The median delay between sampling and HPV analysis was 7 days for the Xpert HPV assay and 19 days for cobas. There were 36 (24.0%) invalid results among s-DRY samples and 4 (2.7%) among dr-WET (p = 0.001). Invalid results happened due to the long interval between collection and analysis. CONCLUSION: Self-collected vaginal dry swabs are a valid alternative to collecting cervical samples in PreservCyt solution for HPV testing with the Xpert HPV assay. IMPACT: HPV self-collection with dry cotton swabs might assist in the implementation of an effective screening strategy in developing countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry ISRCTN83050913 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5547698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55476982017-08-12 Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay Catarino, Rosa Vassilakos, Pierre Bilancioni, Aline Bougel, Stéphanie Boukrid, Meriem Meyer-Hamme, Ulrike Petignat, Patrick PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction-based Xpert human papillomavirus (HPV) assay is a rapid test that detects high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection. This point-of-care test is usually performed by collecting a cervical specimen in a vial of PreservCyt® transport medium. We compared HPV test positivity and accuracy between self-collected sample with a dry swab (s-DRY) versus physician-collected cervical sampling using a broom like brush and immediate immersion in PreservCyt (dr-WET). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 150 women ≥ 18 years old attending the colposcopy clinic in the University Hospital of Geneva. Each participant first self-collected a vaginal sample using a dry swab and then the physician collected a cervical specimen in PreservCyt. HPV analysis was performed with Xpert. Part of the PreservCyt-collected sample was used for hrHPV detection with the cobas® HPV test. HPV test positivity and performance of the two collection methods was compared. RESULTS: HPV positivity was 49.1% for s-DRY, 41.8% for dr-WET and 46.2% for cobas. Good agreement was found between s-DRY and dr-WET samples (kappa±Standard error (SE) = 0.64±0.09,), particularly for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL+) (kappa±SE = 0.80±0.17). Excellent agreement was found between the two samples for HPV16 detection in general (kappa±SE = 0.91±0.09) and among LSIL+ lesions (kappa±SE = 1.00±0.17). Sensitivities and specificities were, respectively, 84.2% and 47.1%(s-DRY), 73.1% and 58.7%. (dr-WET) and 77.8% and 45.7% (cobas) for CIN2+ detection. The median delay between sampling and HPV analysis was 7 days for the Xpert HPV assay and 19 days for cobas. There were 36 (24.0%) invalid results among s-DRY samples and 4 (2.7%) among dr-WET (p = 0.001). Invalid results happened due to the long interval between collection and analysis. CONCLUSION: Self-collected vaginal dry swabs are a valid alternative to collecting cervical samples in PreservCyt solution for HPV testing with the Xpert HPV assay. IMPACT: HPV self-collection with dry cotton swabs might assist in the implementation of an effective screening strategy in developing countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry ISRCTN83050913 Public Library of Science 2017-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5547698/ /pubmed/28750015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181905 Text en © 2017 Catarino et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Catarino, Rosa Vassilakos, Pierre Bilancioni, Aline Bougel, Stéphanie Boukrid, Meriem Meyer-Hamme, Ulrike Petignat, Patrick Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay |
title | Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay |
title_full | Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay |
title_short | Accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the Xpert human papillomavirus assay |
title_sort | accuracy of self-collected vaginal dry swabs using the xpert human papillomavirus assay |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5547698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT catarinorosa accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay AT vassilakospierre accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay AT bilancionialine accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay AT bougelstephanie accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay AT boukridmeriem accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay AT meyerhammeulrike accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay AT petignatpatrick accuracyofselfcollectedvaginaldryswabsusingthexperthumanpapillomavirusassay |