Cargando…

The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of moderate-load (10 RM) and low-load (20 RM) resistance training schemes on maximal strength and body composition. Sixteen resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a moderate-load group (n = 8) or a low-load group (n = 8)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopes, Charles Ricardo, Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha, Crisp, Alex Harley, de Mattos, Renê Scarpari, Lins, Miguel Alves, da Mota, Gustavo Ribeiro, Schoenfeld, Brad Jon, Marchetti, Paulo Henrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0081
_version_ 1783255793692311552
author Lopes, Charles Ricardo
Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha
Crisp, Alex Harley
de Mattos, Renê Scarpari
Lins, Miguel Alves
da Mota, Gustavo Ribeiro
Schoenfeld, Brad Jon
Marchetti, Paulo Henrique
author_facet Lopes, Charles Ricardo
Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha
Crisp, Alex Harley
de Mattos, Renê Scarpari
Lins, Miguel Alves
da Mota, Gustavo Ribeiro
Schoenfeld, Brad Jon
Marchetti, Paulo Henrique
author_sort Lopes, Charles Ricardo
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of moderate-load (10 RM) and low-load (20 RM) resistance training schemes on maximal strength and body composition. Sixteen resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a moderate-load group (n = 8) or a low-load group (n = 8). The resistance training schemes consisted of 8 exercises performed 4 times per week for 6 weeks. In order to equate the number of repetitions performed by each group, the moderate load group performed 6 sets of 10 RM, while the low load group performed 3 sets of 20 RM. Between-group differences were evaluated using a 2-way ANOVA and independent t-tests. There was no difference in the weekly total load lifted (sets × reps × kg) between the 2 groups. Both groups equally improved maximal strength and measures of body composition after 6 weeks of resistance training, with no significant between-group differences detected. In conclusion, both moderate-load and low-load resistance training schemes, similar for the total load lifted, induced a similar improvement in maximal strength and body composition in resistance-trained men.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5548165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55481652017-08-21 The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men Lopes, Charles Ricardo Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha Crisp, Alex Harley de Mattos, Renê Scarpari Lins, Miguel Alves da Mota, Gustavo Ribeiro Schoenfeld, Brad Jon Marchetti, Paulo Henrique J Hum Kinet Section III - Sports Training The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of moderate-load (10 RM) and low-load (20 RM) resistance training schemes on maximal strength and body composition. Sixteen resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a moderate-load group (n = 8) or a low-load group (n = 8). The resistance training schemes consisted of 8 exercises performed 4 times per week for 6 weeks. In order to equate the number of repetitions performed by each group, the moderate load group performed 6 sets of 10 RM, while the low load group performed 3 sets of 20 RM. Between-group differences were evaluated using a 2-way ANOVA and independent t-tests. There was no difference in the weekly total load lifted (sets × reps × kg) between the 2 groups. Both groups equally improved maximal strength and measures of body composition after 6 weeks of resistance training, with no significant between-group differences detected. In conclusion, both moderate-load and low-load resistance training schemes, similar for the total load lifted, induced a similar improvement in maximal strength and body composition in resistance-trained men. De Gruyter Open 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5548165/ /pubmed/28828088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0081 Text en © 2017 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics
spellingShingle Section III - Sports Training
Lopes, Charles Ricardo
Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha
Crisp, Alex Harley
de Mattos, Renê Scarpari
Lins, Miguel Alves
da Mota, Gustavo Ribeiro
Schoenfeld, Brad Jon
Marchetti, Paulo Henrique
The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men
title The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men
title_full The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men
title_short The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men
title_sort effect of different resistance training load schemes on strength and body composition in trained men
topic Section III - Sports Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0081
work_keys_str_mv AT lopescharlesricardo theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT aokimarcelosaldanha theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT crispalexharley theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT demattosrenescarpari theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT linsmiguelalves theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT damotagustavoribeiro theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT schoenfeldbradjon theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT marchettipaulohenrique theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT lopescharlesricardo effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT aokimarcelosaldanha effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT crispalexharley effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT demattosrenescarpari effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT linsmiguelalves effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT damotagustavoribeiro effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT schoenfeldbradjon effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen
AT marchettipaulohenrique effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen