Cargando…
The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of moderate-load (10 RM) and low-load (20 RM) resistance training schemes on maximal strength and body composition. Sixteen resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a moderate-load group (n = 8) or a low-load group (n = 8)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0081 |
_version_ | 1783255793692311552 |
---|---|
author | Lopes, Charles Ricardo Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha Crisp, Alex Harley de Mattos, Renê Scarpari Lins, Miguel Alves da Mota, Gustavo Ribeiro Schoenfeld, Brad Jon Marchetti, Paulo Henrique |
author_facet | Lopes, Charles Ricardo Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha Crisp, Alex Harley de Mattos, Renê Scarpari Lins, Miguel Alves da Mota, Gustavo Ribeiro Schoenfeld, Brad Jon Marchetti, Paulo Henrique |
author_sort | Lopes, Charles Ricardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of moderate-load (10 RM) and low-load (20 RM) resistance training schemes on maximal strength and body composition. Sixteen resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a moderate-load group (n = 8) or a low-load group (n = 8). The resistance training schemes consisted of 8 exercises performed 4 times per week for 6 weeks. In order to equate the number of repetitions performed by each group, the moderate load group performed 6 sets of 10 RM, while the low load group performed 3 sets of 20 RM. Between-group differences were evaluated using a 2-way ANOVA and independent t-tests. There was no difference in the weekly total load lifted (sets × reps × kg) between the 2 groups. Both groups equally improved maximal strength and measures of body composition after 6 weeks of resistance training, with no significant between-group differences detected. In conclusion, both moderate-load and low-load resistance training schemes, similar for the total load lifted, induced a similar improvement in maximal strength and body composition in resistance-trained men. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5548165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | De Gruyter Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55481652017-08-21 The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men Lopes, Charles Ricardo Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha Crisp, Alex Harley de Mattos, Renê Scarpari Lins, Miguel Alves da Mota, Gustavo Ribeiro Schoenfeld, Brad Jon Marchetti, Paulo Henrique J Hum Kinet Section III - Sports Training The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of moderate-load (10 RM) and low-load (20 RM) resistance training schemes on maximal strength and body composition. Sixteen resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a moderate-load group (n = 8) or a low-load group (n = 8). The resistance training schemes consisted of 8 exercises performed 4 times per week for 6 weeks. In order to equate the number of repetitions performed by each group, the moderate load group performed 6 sets of 10 RM, while the low load group performed 3 sets of 20 RM. Between-group differences were evaluated using a 2-way ANOVA and independent t-tests. There was no difference in the weekly total load lifted (sets × reps × kg) between the 2 groups. Both groups equally improved maximal strength and measures of body composition after 6 weeks of resistance training, with no significant between-group differences detected. In conclusion, both moderate-load and low-load resistance training schemes, similar for the total load lifted, induced a similar improvement in maximal strength and body composition in resistance-trained men. De Gruyter Open 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5548165/ /pubmed/28828088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0081 Text en © 2017 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics |
spellingShingle | Section III - Sports Training Lopes, Charles Ricardo Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha Crisp, Alex Harley de Mattos, Renê Scarpari Lins, Miguel Alves da Mota, Gustavo Ribeiro Schoenfeld, Brad Jon Marchetti, Paulo Henrique The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men |
title | The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men |
title_full | The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men |
title_short | The Effect of Different Resistance Training Load Schemes on Strength and Body Composition in Trained Men |
title_sort | effect of different resistance training load schemes on strength and body composition in trained men |
topic | Section III - Sports Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopescharlesricardo theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT aokimarcelosaldanha theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT crispalexharley theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT demattosrenescarpari theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT linsmiguelalves theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT damotagustavoribeiro theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT schoenfeldbradjon theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT marchettipaulohenrique theeffectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT lopescharlesricardo effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT aokimarcelosaldanha effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT crispalexharley effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT demattosrenescarpari effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT linsmiguelalves effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT damotagustavoribeiro effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT schoenfeldbradjon effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen AT marchettipaulohenrique effectofdifferentresistancetrainingloadschemesonstrengthandbodycompositionintrainedmen |