Cargando…

The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women

BACKGROUND: The ability to achieve quality recovery of cell-free foetal DNA is important for making non-invasive prenatal diagnoses. In this study, we performed quantitative and qualitative analyses of isolated DNA from maternal plasma, using different DNA-isolation methods. METHOD: DNA was isolated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rather, Riyaz Ahmad, Saha, Subhas Chandra, Dhawan, Veena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936248
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/62113
_version_ 1783255795877543936
author Rather, Riyaz Ahmad
Saha, Subhas Chandra
Dhawan, Veena
author_facet Rather, Riyaz Ahmad
Saha, Subhas Chandra
Dhawan, Veena
author_sort Rather, Riyaz Ahmad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ability to achieve quality recovery of cell-free foetal DNA is important for making non-invasive prenatal diagnoses. In this study, we performed quantitative and qualitative analyses of isolated DNA from maternal plasma, using different DNA-isolation methods. METHOD: DNA was isolated from 30 iso-immunized women via the QIAamp column-based method, using four different elution volumes and two conventionally based methods. Real-time polymerase chain-reaction quantification of RHD and β-globin genes was performed in order to determine foetal-specific sequences and total genome equivalents, respectively. RESULTS: The column-based method at a 3 μl elution volume yielded the highest quality and quantity of total DNA (67.0±0.6 ng/μL). At a 3 μl elution volume, the β-globin and RHD‐gene sequences were estimated to be the highest among all isolation procedures, with 2778.13±1.5 and 66.9±0.6 GEq/mL, respectively, and a 100% sensitivity for RHD‐gene sequence detection. Among the two conventional manual methods, the boiling lysis method yielded a higher DNA concentration (53.8±0.8 ng/μL) and purity (1.73±0.05). In addition, the method's sensitivity for foetal-detection sequences was only 80%, whereas the salting-out method's sensitivity was just 70%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the theory that the QIAamp method is a specific and sensitive approach for purifying and quantifying plasma DNA, when used in the minimum elution volume.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5548194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55481942017-09-21 The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women Rather, Riyaz Ahmad Saha, Subhas Chandra Dhawan, Veena J Circ Biomark Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The ability to achieve quality recovery of cell-free foetal DNA is important for making non-invasive prenatal diagnoses. In this study, we performed quantitative and qualitative analyses of isolated DNA from maternal plasma, using different DNA-isolation methods. METHOD: DNA was isolated from 30 iso-immunized women via the QIAamp column-based method, using four different elution volumes and two conventionally based methods. Real-time polymerase chain-reaction quantification of RHD and β-globin genes was performed in order to determine foetal-specific sequences and total genome equivalents, respectively. RESULTS: The column-based method at a 3 μl elution volume yielded the highest quality and quantity of total DNA (67.0±0.6 ng/μL). At a 3 μl elution volume, the β-globin and RHD‐gene sequences were estimated to be the highest among all isolation procedures, with 2778.13±1.5 and 66.9±0.6 GEq/mL, respectively, and a 100% sensitivity for RHD‐gene sequence detection. Among the two conventional manual methods, the boiling lysis method yielded a higher DNA concentration (53.8±0.8 ng/μL) and purity (1.73±0.05). In addition, the method's sensitivity for foetal-detection sequences was only 80%, whereas the salting-out method's sensitivity was just 70%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the theory that the QIAamp method is a specific and sensitive approach for purifying and quantifying plasma DNA, when used in the minimum elution volume. SAGE Publications 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5548194/ /pubmed/28936248 http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/62113 Text en © 2015 Author(s). Licensee InTech. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Rather, Riyaz Ahmad
Saha, Subhas Chandra
Dhawan, Veena
The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women
title The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women
title_full The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women
title_fullStr The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women
title_full_unstemmed The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women
title_short The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women
title_sort most favourable procedure for the isolation of cell-free dna from the plasma of iso-immunized rhd-negative pregnant women
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936248
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/62113
work_keys_str_mv AT ratherriyazahmad themostfavourableprocedurefortheisolationofcellfreednafromtheplasmaofisoimmunizedrhdnegativepregnantwomen
AT sahasubhaschandra themostfavourableprocedurefortheisolationofcellfreednafromtheplasmaofisoimmunizedrhdnegativepregnantwomen
AT dhawanveena themostfavourableprocedurefortheisolationofcellfreednafromtheplasmaofisoimmunizedrhdnegativepregnantwomen
AT ratherriyazahmad mostfavourableprocedurefortheisolationofcellfreednafromtheplasmaofisoimmunizedrhdnegativepregnantwomen
AT sahasubhaschandra mostfavourableprocedurefortheisolationofcellfreednafromtheplasmaofisoimmunizedrhdnegativepregnantwomen
AT dhawanveena mostfavourableprocedurefortheisolationofcellfreednafromtheplasmaofisoimmunizedrhdnegativepregnantwomen