Cargando…
Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas
Celiac Disease (CD) affects at least 1% of the population and evidence suggests that prevalence is increasing. The diagnosis of CD depends on providers being alert to both typical and atypical presentations and those situations in which patients are at high risk for the disease. Because of variable...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28943611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases3020086 |
_version_ | 1783255805516054528 |
---|---|
author | Kaswala, Dharmesh H. Veeraraghavan, Gopal Kelly, Ciaran P. Leffler, Daniel A. |
author_facet | Kaswala, Dharmesh H. Veeraraghavan, Gopal Kelly, Ciaran P. Leffler, Daniel A. |
author_sort | Kaswala, Dharmesh H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Celiac Disease (CD) affects at least 1% of the population and evidence suggests that prevalence is increasing. The diagnosis of CD depends on providers being alert to both typical and atypical presentations and those situations in which patients are at high risk for the disease. Because of variable presentation, physicians need to have a low threshold for celiac testing. Robust knowledge of the pathogenesis of this autoimmune disease has served as a catalyst for the development of novel diagnostic tools. Highly sensitive and specific serological assays including Endomysial Antibody (EMA), tissue transglutaminase (tTG), and Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) have greatly simplified testing for CD and serve as the foundation for celiac diagnosis. In addition, genetic testing for HLA DQ2 and DQ8 has become more widely available and there has been refinement of the gluten challenge for use in diagnostic algorithms. While diagnosis is usually straightforward, in special conditions including IgA deficiency, very young children, discrepant histology and serology, and adoption of a gluten free diet prior to testing, CD can be difficult to diagnose. In this review, we provide an overview of the history and current state of celiac disease diagnosis and provide guidance for evaluation of CD in difficult diagnostic circumstances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5548238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55482382017-09-12 Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas Kaswala, Dharmesh H. Veeraraghavan, Gopal Kelly, Ciaran P. Leffler, Daniel A. Diseases Review Celiac Disease (CD) affects at least 1% of the population and evidence suggests that prevalence is increasing. The diagnosis of CD depends on providers being alert to both typical and atypical presentations and those situations in which patients are at high risk for the disease. Because of variable presentation, physicians need to have a low threshold for celiac testing. Robust knowledge of the pathogenesis of this autoimmune disease has served as a catalyst for the development of novel diagnostic tools. Highly sensitive and specific serological assays including Endomysial Antibody (EMA), tissue transglutaminase (tTG), and Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) have greatly simplified testing for CD and serve as the foundation for celiac diagnosis. In addition, genetic testing for HLA DQ2 and DQ8 has become more widely available and there has been refinement of the gluten challenge for use in diagnostic algorithms. While diagnosis is usually straightforward, in special conditions including IgA deficiency, very young children, discrepant histology and serology, and adoption of a gluten free diet prior to testing, CD can be difficult to diagnose. In this review, we provide an overview of the history and current state of celiac disease diagnosis and provide guidance for evaluation of CD in difficult diagnostic circumstances. MDPI 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5548238/ /pubmed/28943611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases3020086 Text en © 2015 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kaswala, Dharmesh H. Veeraraghavan, Gopal Kelly, Ciaran P. Leffler, Daniel A. Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas |
title | Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas |
title_full | Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas |
title_fullStr | Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas |
title_full_unstemmed | Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas |
title_short | Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas |
title_sort | celiac disease: diagnostic standards and dilemmas |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28943611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases3020086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaswaladharmeshh celiacdiseasediagnosticstandardsanddilemmas AT veeraraghavangopal celiacdiseasediagnosticstandardsanddilemmas AT kellyciaranp celiacdiseasediagnosticstandardsanddilemmas AT lefflerdaniela celiacdiseasediagnosticstandardsanddilemmas |