Cargando…
Subcutaneously Placed Breast Implants after a Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Do We Always Need ADM?
Immediate breast reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option after mastectomy for prophylaxis of early breast cancer. Different options exist for implant placement, incision technique, patient suitability, and institutional experience. This article is a case series exploring the feasibility and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001371 |
_version_ | 1783255839833849856 |
---|---|
author | Singla, Apresh Singla, Animesh Lai, Eric Caminer, David |
author_facet | Singla, Apresh Singla, Animesh Lai, Eric Caminer, David |
author_sort | Singla, Apresh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Immediate breast reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option after mastectomy for prophylaxis of early breast cancer. Different options exist for implant placement, incision technique, patient suitability, and institutional experience. This article is a case series exploring the feasibility and outcomes of patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction using skin-sparing mastectomy without mesh or acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and with a vertical inframammary incision. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed for all patients who underwent immediate single-stage reconstruction with subcutaneous silicon implants without ADM between 2009 and 2014 inclusive. Patient, operative and treatment variables were extracted. All patients with viable mastectomy skin flaps intraoperatively and at least 5 mm of subcutaneous tissue were eligible except for patients who were deemed too slim by the senior surgeon preoperatively and thus at risk of implant visibility or skin rippling. RESULTS: There were 26 patients (bilateral n = 12 and unilateral n = 14) eligible for analysis, with a median long-term follow-up of 51.5 months. The majority of complications were classified as minor affecting 46.2% of the cohort (n = 12). There were 20 episodes of complications overall. The most frequent episodes were contour defects (x = 5), minor seroma (x = 4), and malrotation and minor infection (x = 3). There was 1 episode of capsular contracture. CONCLUSION: Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate subcutaneous silicon implant reconstruction with a vertical incision and without the need for mesh or ADM is an acceptable and safe treatment option. Accurate patient selection and skin flap viability is the key to achieving optimal outcomes with this approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5548558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55485582017-08-22 Subcutaneously Placed Breast Implants after a Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Do We Always Need ADM? Singla, Apresh Singla, Animesh Lai, Eric Caminer, David Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Immediate breast reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option after mastectomy for prophylaxis of early breast cancer. Different options exist for implant placement, incision technique, patient suitability, and institutional experience. This article is a case series exploring the feasibility and outcomes of patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction using skin-sparing mastectomy without mesh or acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and with a vertical inframammary incision. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed for all patients who underwent immediate single-stage reconstruction with subcutaneous silicon implants without ADM between 2009 and 2014 inclusive. Patient, operative and treatment variables were extracted. All patients with viable mastectomy skin flaps intraoperatively and at least 5 mm of subcutaneous tissue were eligible except for patients who were deemed too slim by the senior surgeon preoperatively and thus at risk of implant visibility or skin rippling. RESULTS: There were 26 patients (bilateral n = 12 and unilateral n = 14) eligible for analysis, with a median long-term follow-up of 51.5 months. The majority of complications were classified as minor affecting 46.2% of the cohort (n = 12). There were 20 episodes of complications overall. The most frequent episodes were contour defects (x = 5), minor seroma (x = 4), and malrotation and minor infection (x = 3). There was 1 episode of capsular contracture. CONCLUSION: Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate subcutaneous silicon implant reconstruction with a vertical incision and without the need for mesh or ADM is an acceptable and safe treatment option. Accurate patient selection and skin flap viability is the key to achieving optimal outcomes with this approach. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5548558/ /pubmed/28831335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001371 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singla, Apresh Singla, Animesh Lai, Eric Caminer, David Subcutaneously Placed Breast Implants after a Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Do We Always Need ADM? |
title | Subcutaneously Placed Breast Implants after a Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Do We Always Need ADM? |
title_full | Subcutaneously Placed Breast Implants after a Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Do We Always Need ADM? |
title_fullStr | Subcutaneously Placed Breast Implants after a Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Do We Always Need ADM? |
title_full_unstemmed | Subcutaneously Placed Breast Implants after a Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Do We Always Need ADM? |
title_short | Subcutaneously Placed Breast Implants after a Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Do We Always Need ADM? |
title_sort | subcutaneously placed breast implants after a skin-sparing mastectomy: do we always need adm? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singlaapresh subcutaneouslyplacedbreastimplantsafteraskinsparingmastectomydowealwaysneedadm AT singlaanimesh subcutaneouslyplacedbreastimplantsafteraskinsparingmastectomydowealwaysneedadm AT laieric subcutaneouslyplacedbreastimplantsafteraskinsparingmastectomydowealwaysneedadm AT caminerdavid subcutaneouslyplacedbreastimplantsafteraskinsparingmastectomydowealwaysneedadm |