Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphedema and Analysis of False-Negative Tests

Lymphedema is the chronic enlargement of tissue due to inadequate lymphatic function. Diagnosis is made by history and physical examination and confirmed with lymphoscintigraphy. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lymphoscintigraphy for the diagnosis of lymphedema and to determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassanein, Aladdin H., Maclellan, Reid A., Grant, Frederick D., Greene, Arin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001396
_version_ 1783255841521008640
author Hassanein, Aladdin H.
Maclellan, Reid A.
Grant, Frederick D.
Greene, Arin K.
author_facet Hassanein, Aladdin H.
Maclellan, Reid A.
Grant, Frederick D.
Greene, Arin K.
author_sort Hassanein, Aladdin H.
collection PubMed
description Lymphedema is the chronic enlargement of tissue due to inadequate lymphatic function. Diagnosis is made by history and physical examination and confirmed with lymphoscintigraphy. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lymphoscintigraphy for the diagnosis of lymphedema and to determine characteristics of patients with false-negative tests. METHODS: Individuals referred to our lymphedema program with “lymphedema” between 2009 and 2016 were analyzed. Subjects were assessed by history, physical examination, and lymphoscintigraphy. Patient age at presentation, duration of lymphedema, location of disease, gender, previous infections, and lymphedema type were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 227 patients (454 limbs); lymphedema was diagnosed clinically in 169 subjects and confirmed by lymphoscintigraphy in 162 (117 primary, 45 secondary; 96% sensitivity). Fifty-eight patients were thought to have a condition other than lymphedema, and all had negative lymphoscintigrams (100% specificity). A subgroup analysis of the 7 individuals with lymphedema clinically, but normal lymphoscintigrams, showed that all had primary lymphedema; duration of disease and infection history were not different between true-positive and false-negative lymphoscintigram results (P = 0.5). Two patients with a false-negative test underwent repeat lymphoscintigraphy, which then showed lymphatic dysfunction consistent with lymphedema. CONCLUSION: Lymphoscintigraphy is very sensitive and specific for lymphedema. All patients with false-negative studies had primary lymphedema. A patient with a high clinical suspicion of lymphedema and a normal lymphoscintigram should be treated conservatively for the disease and undergo repeat lymphoscintigraphy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5548565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55485652017-08-22 Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphedema and Analysis of False-Negative Tests Hassanein, Aladdin H. Maclellan, Reid A. Grant, Frederick D. Greene, Arin K. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Lymphedema is the chronic enlargement of tissue due to inadequate lymphatic function. Diagnosis is made by history and physical examination and confirmed with lymphoscintigraphy. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lymphoscintigraphy for the diagnosis of lymphedema and to determine characteristics of patients with false-negative tests. METHODS: Individuals referred to our lymphedema program with “lymphedema” between 2009 and 2016 were analyzed. Subjects were assessed by history, physical examination, and lymphoscintigraphy. Patient age at presentation, duration of lymphedema, location of disease, gender, previous infections, and lymphedema type were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 227 patients (454 limbs); lymphedema was diagnosed clinically in 169 subjects and confirmed by lymphoscintigraphy in 162 (117 primary, 45 secondary; 96% sensitivity). Fifty-eight patients were thought to have a condition other than lymphedema, and all had negative lymphoscintigrams (100% specificity). A subgroup analysis of the 7 individuals with lymphedema clinically, but normal lymphoscintigrams, showed that all had primary lymphedema; duration of disease and infection history were not different between true-positive and false-negative lymphoscintigram results (P = 0.5). Two patients with a false-negative test underwent repeat lymphoscintigraphy, which then showed lymphatic dysfunction consistent with lymphedema. CONCLUSION: Lymphoscintigraphy is very sensitive and specific for lymphedema. All patients with false-negative studies had primary lymphedema. A patient with a high clinical suspicion of lymphedema and a normal lymphoscintigram should be treated conservatively for the disease and undergo repeat lymphoscintigraphy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5548565/ /pubmed/28831342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001396 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hassanein, Aladdin H.
Maclellan, Reid A.
Grant, Frederick D.
Greene, Arin K.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphedema and Analysis of False-Negative Tests
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphedema and Analysis of False-Negative Tests
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphedema and Analysis of False-Negative Tests
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphedema and Analysis of False-Negative Tests
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphedema and Analysis of False-Negative Tests
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphedema and Analysis of False-Negative Tests
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of lymphoscintigraphy for lymphedema and analysis of false-negative tests
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001396
work_keys_str_mv AT hassaneinaladdinh diagnosticaccuracyoflymphoscintigraphyforlymphedemaandanalysisoffalsenegativetests
AT maclellanreida diagnosticaccuracyoflymphoscintigraphyforlymphedemaandanalysisoffalsenegativetests
AT grantfrederickd diagnosticaccuracyoflymphoscintigraphyforlymphedemaandanalysisoffalsenegativetests
AT greenearink diagnosticaccuracyoflymphoscintigraphyforlymphedemaandanalysisoffalsenegativetests