Cargando…
Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: CT-P10 is a biosimilar of innovator rituximab (RTX), a biological therapy used to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have responded inadequately to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the clinical profile of CT-P10 versus RTX in patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28612179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7 |
_version_ | 1783255884867043328 |
---|---|
author | Yoo, Dae Hyun Suh, Chang-Hee Shim, Seung Cheol Jeka, Slawomir Molina, Francisco Fidencio Cons Hrycaj, Pawel Wiland, Piotr Lee, Eun Young Medina-Rodriguez, Francisco G. Shesternya, Pavel Radominski, Sebastiao Stanislav, Marina Kovalenko, Volodymyr Sheen, Dong Hyuk Myasoutova, Leysan Lim, Mie Jin Choe, Jung-Yoon Lee, Sang Joon Lee, Sung Young Kim, Sung Hwan Park, Won |
author_facet | Yoo, Dae Hyun Suh, Chang-Hee Shim, Seung Cheol Jeka, Slawomir Molina, Francisco Fidencio Cons Hrycaj, Pawel Wiland, Piotr Lee, Eun Young Medina-Rodriguez, Francisco G. Shesternya, Pavel Radominski, Sebastiao Stanislav, Marina Kovalenko, Volodymyr Sheen, Dong Hyuk Myasoutova, Leysan Lim, Mie Jin Choe, Jung-Yoon Lee, Sang Joon Lee, Sung Young Kim, Sung Hwan Park, Won |
author_sort | Yoo, Dae Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CT-P10 is a biosimilar of innovator rituximab (RTX), a biological therapy used to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have responded inadequately to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the clinical profile of CT-P10 versus RTX in patients with RA who received up to two courses of treatment and were followed for up to 72 weeks. METHODS: In this multicenter double-blind phase I study, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive CT-P10 1000 mg or RTX 1000 mg at weeks 0 and 2. Based on disease activity, patients could receive a second course of treatment between weeks 24 and 48. Efficacy endpoints, including mean change from baseline in Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28), safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 154 patients were randomized to CT-P10 or RTX (n = 103 and 51, respectively); 137 (n = 92 and 45) completed the first course of treatment, of whom 83 (n = 60 and 23) were re-treated. Improvements from baseline in all efficacy endpoints were highly similar between the CT-P10 and RTX groups over both treatment courses. At week 24 after the second course, mean change from week 0 of the first course in DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate was −2.47 and −2.04 for CT-P10 and RTX, respectively, (p = 0.1866) and in DAS28 C-reactive protein was −2.32 and −2.00, respectively (p = 0.3268). The proportion of patients positive for antidrug antibodies at week 24 after the second treatment course was 20.0% and 21.7% in the CT-P10 and RTX groups, respectively. The safety profile of CT-P10 was comparable to that of RTX, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RA, efficacy, safety, and other clinical data were comparable between CT-P10 and RTX after up to two courses of treatment over 72 weeks. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01534884). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5548818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55488182017-08-24 Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial Yoo, Dae Hyun Suh, Chang-Hee Shim, Seung Cheol Jeka, Slawomir Molina, Francisco Fidencio Cons Hrycaj, Pawel Wiland, Piotr Lee, Eun Young Medina-Rodriguez, Francisco G. Shesternya, Pavel Radominski, Sebastiao Stanislav, Marina Kovalenko, Volodymyr Sheen, Dong Hyuk Myasoutova, Leysan Lim, Mie Jin Choe, Jung-Yoon Lee, Sang Joon Lee, Sung Young Kim, Sung Hwan Park, Won BioDrugs Original Research Article BACKGROUND: CT-P10 is a biosimilar of innovator rituximab (RTX), a biological therapy used to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have responded inadequately to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the clinical profile of CT-P10 versus RTX in patients with RA who received up to two courses of treatment and were followed for up to 72 weeks. METHODS: In this multicenter double-blind phase I study, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive CT-P10 1000 mg or RTX 1000 mg at weeks 0 and 2. Based on disease activity, patients could receive a second course of treatment between weeks 24 and 48. Efficacy endpoints, including mean change from baseline in Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28), safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 154 patients were randomized to CT-P10 or RTX (n = 103 and 51, respectively); 137 (n = 92 and 45) completed the first course of treatment, of whom 83 (n = 60 and 23) were re-treated. Improvements from baseline in all efficacy endpoints were highly similar between the CT-P10 and RTX groups over both treatment courses. At week 24 after the second course, mean change from week 0 of the first course in DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate was −2.47 and −2.04 for CT-P10 and RTX, respectively, (p = 0.1866) and in DAS28 C-reactive protein was −2.32 and −2.00, respectively (p = 0.3268). The proportion of patients positive for antidrug antibodies at week 24 after the second treatment course was 20.0% and 21.7% in the CT-P10 and RTX groups, respectively. The safety profile of CT-P10 was comparable to that of RTX, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RA, efficacy, safety, and other clinical data were comparable between CT-P10 and RTX after up to two courses of treatment over 72 weeks. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01534884). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-06-13 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5548818/ /pubmed/28612179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Yoo, Dae Hyun Suh, Chang-Hee Shim, Seung Cheol Jeka, Slawomir Molina, Francisco Fidencio Cons Hrycaj, Pawel Wiland, Piotr Lee, Eun Young Medina-Rodriguez, Francisco G. Shesternya, Pavel Radominski, Sebastiao Stanislav, Marina Kovalenko, Volodymyr Sheen, Dong Hyuk Myasoutova, Leysan Lim, Mie Jin Choe, Jung-Yoon Lee, Sang Joon Lee, Sung Young Kim, Sung Hwan Park, Won Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of up to two courses of the rituximab biosimilar ct-p10 versus innovator rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results up to week 72 of a phase i randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28612179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoodaehyun efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suhchanghee efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shimseungcheol efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jekaslawomir efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT molinafranciscofidenciocons efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hrycajpawel efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wilandpiotr efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leeeunyoung efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT medinarodriguezfranciscog efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shesternyapavel efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT radominskisebastiao efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stanislavmarina efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kovalenkovolodymyr efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sheendonghyuk efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT myasoutovaleysan efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT limmiejin efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choejungyoon efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leesangjoon efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leesungyoung efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimsunghwan efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkwon efficacysafetyandpharmacokineticsofuptotwocoursesoftherituximabbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisresultsuptoweek72ofaphaseirandomizedcontrolledtrial |