Cargando…

The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of health-related quality-of-life (QoL) data in relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) of new anti-cancer drugs across European jurisdictions, during health technology assessment procedures. METHODS: Comparative analysis of guidelines and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kleijnen, Sarah, Leonardo Alves, Teresa, Meijboom, Kim, Lipska, Iga, De Boer, Anthonius, Leufkens, Hubertus G., Goettsch, Wim G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28401419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1574-9
_version_ 1783255889199759360
author Kleijnen, Sarah
Leonardo Alves, Teresa
Meijboom, Kim
Lipska, Iga
De Boer, Anthonius
Leufkens, Hubertus G.
Goettsch, Wim G.
author_facet Kleijnen, Sarah
Leonardo Alves, Teresa
Meijboom, Kim
Lipska, Iga
De Boer, Anthonius
Leufkens, Hubertus G.
Goettsch, Wim G.
author_sort Kleijnen, Sarah
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of health-related quality-of-life (QoL) data in relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) of new anti-cancer drugs across European jurisdictions, during health technology assessment procedures. METHODS: Comparative analysis of guidelines and publicly available REAs in six European jurisdictions of anti-cancer drugs approved by EMA between 2011 and 2013. RESULTS: Fourteen anti-cancer drugs were included, adding up to 79 REAs. Whilst all guidelines state that QoL is a relevant endpoint to determine the relative effectiveness of new cancer drugs, QoL data were included in only 54% of the 79 reports and their impact on the recommendations was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst national guidelines recognize the relevance of QoL to determine the relative effectiveness of new anti-cancer drugs, this is not well-reflected in current assessments. Developing and implementing into REAs specific evidence requirements for QoL data would improve the use of this patient-centred outcome in future reimbursement and pricing decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1574-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5548837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55488372017-08-24 The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries Kleijnen, Sarah Leonardo Alves, Teresa Meijboom, Kim Lipska, Iga De Boer, Anthonius Leufkens, Hubertus G. Goettsch, Wim G. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of health-related quality-of-life (QoL) data in relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) of new anti-cancer drugs across European jurisdictions, during health technology assessment procedures. METHODS: Comparative analysis of guidelines and publicly available REAs in six European jurisdictions of anti-cancer drugs approved by EMA between 2011 and 2013. RESULTS: Fourteen anti-cancer drugs were included, adding up to 79 REAs. Whilst all guidelines state that QoL is a relevant endpoint to determine the relative effectiveness of new cancer drugs, QoL data were included in only 54% of the 79 reports and their impact on the recommendations was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst national guidelines recognize the relevance of QoL to determine the relative effectiveness of new anti-cancer drugs, this is not well-reflected in current assessments. Developing and implementing into REAs specific evidence requirements for QoL data would improve the use of this patient-centred outcome in future reimbursement and pricing decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1574-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-04-11 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5548837/ /pubmed/28401419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1574-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Kleijnen, Sarah
Leonardo Alves, Teresa
Meijboom, Kim
Lipska, Iga
De Boer, Anthonius
Leufkens, Hubertus G.
Goettsch, Wim G.
The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries
title The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries
title_full The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries
title_fullStr The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries
title_full_unstemmed The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries
title_short The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries
title_sort impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in european countries
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28401419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1574-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kleijnensarah theimpactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT leonardoalvesteresa theimpactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT meijboomkim theimpactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT lipskaiga theimpactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT deboeranthonius theimpactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT leufkenshubertusg theimpactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT goettschwimg theimpactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT kleijnensarah impactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT leonardoalvesteresa impactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT meijboomkim impactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT lipskaiga impactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT deboeranthonius impactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT leufkenshubertusg impactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries
AT goettschwimg impactofqualityoflifedatainrelativeeffectivenessassessmentsofnewanticancerdrugsineuropeancountries