Cargando…
Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy
BACKGROUND: Current standard neoadjuvant treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is 3-weekly platinum-based chemotherapy (CP3w). Patients unable to have interval debulking surgery (IDS) or with significant residual disease have a poor outcome to CP3w treatment. We investigated the outcome in patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
ESMO Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000117 |
_version_ | 1783255923361316864 |
---|---|
author | Milani, Andrea Kristeleit, Rebecca McCormack, Mary Raja, Fharat Luvero, Daniela Widschwendter, Martin MacDonald, Nicola Mould, Tim Olatain, Adeola Hackshaw, Allan Ledermann, Jonathan A |
author_facet | Milani, Andrea Kristeleit, Rebecca McCormack, Mary Raja, Fharat Luvero, Daniela Widschwendter, Martin MacDonald, Nicola Mould, Tim Olatain, Adeola Hackshaw, Allan Ledermann, Jonathan A |
author_sort | Milani, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current standard neoadjuvant treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is 3-weekly platinum-based chemotherapy (CP3w). Patients unable to have interval debulking surgery (IDS) or with significant residual disease have a poor outcome to CP3w treatment. We investigated the outcome in patients who were switched to dose-dense chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 30 patients treated at UCLH in 2009–2013, who switched to dose-dense chemotherapy after neoadjuvant CP3w, having achieved a poor response/progressed and unable to proceed to IDS (n=21), or had >1 cm residual disease after IDS (n=9). Treatment was 3-weekly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel (n=23), or both drugs weekly (n=7). For comparison, we included 30 matched patients treated with CP3w followed by IDS (n=24, without or ≤1 cm residual disease; n=6, with >1 cm residual disease). Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were measured from the date of diagnosis until progression (CT scan or CA-125) and death from any cause, respectively. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The response rate to dose-dense chemotherapy was 70% (Gynecological Cancer Intergroup criteria). In the dose-dense group, 24 patients had tumour progression and 16 died; the corresponding numbers in the control group were 24 and 11. Median TTP was 15.8 months with dose-dense therapy, higher than expected for this patient group, and the same as in the control group (15.7 months) undergoing IDS, p=0.27. Median TTP in patients with residual disease postsurgery was 16.5 months (dose-dense) and 10.8 months (controls), p=0.02. TTP in dose-dense patients who did not have surgery was 10.4 months. Median OS was 31.3 (dose-dense) and 59.6 months (controls), p=0.06. Dose-dense chemotherapy was well tolerated: only three patients interrupted treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Switching to dose-dense chemotherapy in patients who failed to respond to CT3w neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be an effective strategy and requires further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5548979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | ESMO Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55489792017-08-28 Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy Milani, Andrea Kristeleit, Rebecca McCormack, Mary Raja, Fharat Luvero, Daniela Widschwendter, Martin MacDonald, Nicola Mould, Tim Olatain, Adeola Hackshaw, Allan Ledermann, Jonathan A ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Current standard neoadjuvant treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is 3-weekly platinum-based chemotherapy (CP3w). Patients unable to have interval debulking surgery (IDS) or with significant residual disease have a poor outcome to CP3w treatment. We investigated the outcome in patients who were switched to dose-dense chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 30 patients treated at UCLH in 2009–2013, who switched to dose-dense chemotherapy after neoadjuvant CP3w, having achieved a poor response/progressed and unable to proceed to IDS (n=21), or had >1 cm residual disease after IDS (n=9). Treatment was 3-weekly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel (n=23), or both drugs weekly (n=7). For comparison, we included 30 matched patients treated with CP3w followed by IDS (n=24, without or ≤1 cm residual disease; n=6, with >1 cm residual disease). Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were measured from the date of diagnosis until progression (CT scan or CA-125) and death from any cause, respectively. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The response rate to dose-dense chemotherapy was 70% (Gynecological Cancer Intergroup criteria). In the dose-dense group, 24 patients had tumour progression and 16 died; the corresponding numbers in the control group were 24 and 11. Median TTP was 15.8 months with dose-dense therapy, higher than expected for this patient group, and the same as in the control group (15.7 months) undergoing IDS, p=0.27. Median TTP in patients with residual disease postsurgery was 16.5 months (dose-dense) and 10.8 months (controls), p=0.02. TTP in dose-dense patients who did not have surgery was 10.4 months. Median OS was 31.3 (dose-dense) and 59.6 months (controls), p=0.06. Dose-dense chemotherapy was well tolerated: only three patients interrupted treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Switching to dose-dense chemotherapy in patients who failed to respond to CT3w neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be an effective strategy and requires further investigation. ESMO Open 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5548979/ /pubmed/28848659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000117 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Milani, Andrea Kristeleit, Rebecca McCormack, Mary Raja, Fharat Luvero, Daniela Widschwendter, Martin MacDonald, Nicola Mould, Tim Olatain, Adeola Hackshaw, Allan Ledermann, Jonathan A Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy |
title | Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy |
title_full | Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy |
title_fullStr | Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy |
title_short | Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy |
title_sort | switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milaniandrea switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT kristeleitrebecca switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT mccormackmary switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT rajafharat switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT luverodaniela switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT widschwendtermartin switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT macdonaldnicola switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT mouldtim switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT olatainadeola switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT hackshawallan switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy AT ledermannjonathana switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy |