Cargando…

Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy

BACKGROUND: Current standard neoadjuvant treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is 3-weekly platinum-based chemotherapy (CP3w). Patients unable to have interval debulking surgery (IDS) or with significant residual disease have a poor outcome to CP3w treatment. We investigated the outcome in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milani, Andrea, Kristeleit, Rebecca, McCormack, Mary, Raja, Fharat, Luvero, Daniela, Widschwendter, Martin, MacDonald, Nicola, Mould, Tim, Olatain, Adeola, Hackshaw, Allan, Ledermann, Jonathan A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ESMO Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000117
_version_ 1783255923361316864
author Milani, Andrea
Kristeleit, Rebecca
McCormack, Mary
Raja, Fharat
Luvero, Daniela
Widschwendter, Martin
MacDonald, Nicola
Mould, Tim
Olatain, Adeola
Hackshaw, Allan
Ledermann, Jonathan A
author_facet Milani, Andrea
Kristeleit, Rebecca
McCormack, Mary
Raja, Fharat
Luvero, Daniela
Widschwendter, Martin
MacDonald, Nicola
Mould, Tim
Olatain, Adeola
Hackshaw, Allan
Ledermann, Jonathan A
author_sort Milani, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current standard neoadjuvant treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is 3-weekly platinum-based chemotherapy (CP3w). Patients unable to have interval debulking surgery (IDS) or with significant residual disease have a poor outcome to CP3w treatment. We investigated the outcome in patients who were switched to dose-dense chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 30 patients treated at UCLH in 2009–2013, who switched to dose-dense chemotherapy after neoadjuvant CP3w, having achieved a poor response/progressed and unable to proceed to IDS (n=21), or had >1 cm residual disease after IDS (n=9). Treatment was 3-weekly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel (n=23), or both drugs weekly (n=7). For comparison, we included 30 matched patients treated with CP3w followed by IDS (n=24, without or ≤1 cm residual disease; n=6, with >1 cm residual disease). Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were measured from the date of diagnosis until progression (CT scan or CA-125) and death from any cause, respectively. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The response rate to dose-dense chemotherapy was 70% (Gynecological Cancer Intergroup criteria). In the dose-dense group, 24 patients had tumour progression and 16 died; the corresponding numbers in the control group were 24 and 11. Median TTP was 15.8 months with dose-dense therapy, higher than expected for this patient group, and the same as in the control group (15.7 months) undergoing IDS, p=0.27. Median TTP in patients with residual disease postsurgery was 16.5 months (dose-dense) and 10.8 months (controls), p=0.02. TTP in dose-dense patients who did not have surgery was 10.4 months. Median OS was 31.3 (dose-dense) and 59.6 months (controls), p=0.06. Dose-dense chemotherapy was well tolerated: only three patients interrupted treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Switching to dose-dense chemotherapy in patients who failed to respond to CT3w neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be an effective strategy and requires further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5548979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher ESMO Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55489792017-08-28 Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy Milani, Andrea Kristeleit, Rebecca McCormack, Mary Raja, Fharat Luvero, Daniela Widschwendter, Martin MacDonald, Nicola Mould, Tim Olatain, Adeola Hackshaw, Allan Ledermann, Jonathan A ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Current standard neoadjuvant treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is 3-weekly platinum-based chemotherapy (CP3w). Patients unable to have interval debulking surgery (IDS) or with significant residual disease have a poor outcome to CP3w treatment. We investigated the outcome in patients who were switched to dose-dense chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 30 patients treated at UCLH in 2009–2013, who switched to dose-dense chemotherapy after neoadjuvant CP3w, having achieved a poor response/progressed and unable to proceed to IDS (n=21), or had >1 cm residual disease after IDS (n=9). Treatment was 3-weekly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel (n=23), or both drugs weekly (n=7). For comparison, we included 30 matched patients treated with CP3w followed by IDS (n=24, without or ≤1 cm residual disease; n=6, with >1 cm residual disease). Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were measured from the date of diagnosis until progression (CT scan or CA-125) and death from any cause, respectively. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The response rate to dose-dense chemotherapy was 70% (Gynecological Cancer Intergroup criteria). In the dose-dense group, 24 patients had tumour progression and 16 died; the corresponding numbers in the control group were 24 and 11. Median TTP was 15.8 months with dose-dense therapy, higher than expected for this patient group, and the same as in the control group (15.7 months) undergoing IDS, p=0.27. Median TTP in patients with residual disease postsurgery was 16.5 months (dose-dense) and 10.8 months (controls), p=0.02. TTP in dose-dense patients who did not have surgery was 10.4 months. Median OS was 31.3 (dose-dense) and 59.6 months (controls), p=0.06. Dose-dense chemotherapy was well tolerated: only three patients interrupted treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Switching to dose-dense chemotherapy in patients who failed to respond to CT3w neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be an effective strategy and requires further investigation. ESMO Open 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5548979/ /pubmed/28848659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000117 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Milani, Andrea
Kristeleit, Rebecca
McCormack, Mary
Raja, Fharat
Luvero, Daniela
Widschwendter, Martin
MacDonald, Nicola
Mould, Tim
Olatain, Adeola
Hackshaw, Allan
Ledermann, Jonathan A
Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy
title Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy
title_full Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy
title_fullStr Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy
title_short Switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy
title_sort switching from standard to dose-dense chemotherapy in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of feasibility and efficacy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000117
work_keys_str_mv AT milaniandrea switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT kristeleitrebecca switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT mccormackmary switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT rajafharat switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT luverodaniela switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT widschwendtermartin switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT macdonaldnicola switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT mouldtim switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT olatainadeola switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT hackshawallan switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy
AT ledermannjonathana switchingfromstandardtodosedensechemotherapyinfrontlinetreatmentofadvancedovariancanceraretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandefficacy