Cargando…
Radiological imaging markers predicting clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib: post hoc analysis of the CORRECT phase III trial (RadioCORRECT study)
OBJECTIVE: To identify imaging markers predicting clinical outcomes to regorafenib in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). METHODS: The RadioCORRECT study is a post hoc analysis of a cohort of patients with mCRC treated within the phase III placebo-controlled CORRECT trial of regorafenib. Baselin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
ESMO Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000111 |
_version_ | 1783255923608780800 |
---|---|
author | Ricotta, Riccardo Verrioli, Antonella Ghezzi, Silvia Porcu, Luca Grothey, A Falcone, Alfredo Van Cutsem, Eric Argilés, Guillem Adenis, Antoine Ychou, Marc Barone, Carlo Bouché, Olivier Peeters, Marc Humblet, Yves Mineur, Laurent Sobrero, Alberto F Hubbard, Joleen M Cremolini, Chiara Prenen, Hans Tabernero, Josep Jarraya, Hajer Mazard, Thibault Deguelte-Lardiere, Sophie Papadimitriou, Konstantinos Van den Eynde, Marc Pastorino, Alessandro Redaelli, Daniela Bencardino, Katia Funaioli, Chiara Amatu, Alessio Carlo-Stella, Giulia Torri, Valter Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea Vanzulli, Angelo Siena, Salvatore |
author_facet | Ricotta, Riccardo Verrioli, Antonella Ghezzi, Silvia Porcu, Luca Grothey, A Falcone, Alfredo Van Cutsem, Eric Argilés, Guillem Adenis, Antoine Ychou, Marc Barone, Carlo Bouché, Olivier Peeters, Marc Humblet, Yves Mineur, Laurent Sobrero, Alberto F Hubbard, Joleen M Cremolini, Chiara Prenen, Hans Tabernero, Josep Jarraya, Hajer Mazard, Thibault Deguelte-Lardiere, Sophie Papadimitriou, Konstantinos Van den Eynde, Marc Pastorino, Alessandro Redaelli, Daniela Bencardino, Katia Funaioli, Chiara Amatu, Alessio Carlo-Stella, Giulia Torri, Valter Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea Vanzulli, Angelo Siena, Salvatore |
author_sort | Ricotta, Riccardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To identify imaging markers predicting clinical outcomes to regorafenib in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). METHODS: The RadioCORRECT study is a post hoc analysis of a cohort of patients with mCRC treated within the phase III placebo-controlled CORRECT trial of regorafenib. Baseline and week 8 contrast-enhanced CT were used to assess response by RECIST 1.1, changes in the sum of target lesion diameters (ΔSTL), lung metastases cavitation and liver metastases density. Primary and secondary objectives were to develop ex novo univariable and multivariable models to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. RESULTS: 202 patients were enrolled, 134 (66.3%) treated with regorafenib and 68 (33.7%) with placebo. In the univariate analysis, PFS predictors were lung metastases cavitation at baseline (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.92, p=0.03) and at week 8 (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93, p=0.02). Baseline cavitation (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.66, p=0.007), RECIST 1.1 (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.4, p <0.0001) and ΔSTL (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27, p=0.002) predicted OS. We found an increase of 9% of diameter as the best threshold for discriminating OS (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.61 to 4.34, p <0.001). In the multivariate analysis, baseline and week 8 cavitation remained significant PFS predictors. Baseline cavitation, RECIST 1.1 and ΔSTL remained predictors of OS in exploratory multivariable models. Assessment of liver metastases density did not predict clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: RECIST 1.1 and ΔSTL predict favourable outcome to regorafenib. In contrast to liver metastases density that failed to be a predictor, lung metastases cavitation represents a novel radiological marker of favourable outcome that deserves consideration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5548980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | ESMO Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55489802017-08-28 Radiological imaging markers predicting clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib: post hoc analysis of the CORRECT phase III trial (RadioCORRECT study) Ricotta, Riccardo Verrioli, Antonella Ghezzi, Silvia Porcu, Luca Grothey, A Falcone, Alfredo Van Cutsem, Eric Argilés, Guillem Adenis, Antoine Ychou, Marc Barone, Carlo Bouché, Olivier Peeters, Marc Humblet, Yves Mineur, Laurent Sobrero, Alberto F Hubbard, Joleen M Cremolini, Chiara Prenen, Hans Tabernero, Josep Jarraya, Hajer Mazard, Thibault Deguelte-Lardiere, Sophie Papadimitriou, Konstantinos Van den Eynde, Marc Pastorino, Alessandro Redaelli, Daniela Bencardino, Katia Funaioli, Chiara Amatu, Alessio Carlo-Stella, Giulia Torri, Valter Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea Vanzulli, Angelo Siena, Salvatore ESMO Open Original Research OBJECTIVE: To identify imaging markers predicting clinical outcomes to regorafenib in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). METHODS: The RadioCORRECT study is a post hoc analysis of a cohort of patients with mCRC treated within the phase III placebo-controlled CORRECT trial of regorafenib. Baseline and week 8 contrast-enhanced CT were used to assess response by RECIST 1.1, changes in the sum of target lesion diameters (ΔSTL), lung metastases cavitation and liver metastases density. Primary and secondary objectives were to develop ex novo univariable and multivariable models to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. RESULTS: 202 patients were enrolled, 134 (66.3%) treated with regorafenib and 68 (33.7%) with placebo. In the univariate analysis, PFS predictors were lung metastases cavitation at baseline (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.92, p=0.03) and at week 8 (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93, p=0.02). Baseline cavitation (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.66, p=0.007), RECIST 1.1 (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.4, p <0.0001) and ΔSTL (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27, p=0.002) predicted OS. We found an increase of 9% of diameter as the best threshold for discriminating OS (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.61 to 4.34, p <0.001). In the multivariate analysis, baseline and week 8 cavitation remained significant PFS predictors. Baseline cavitation, RECIST 1.1 and ΔSTL remained predictors of OS in exploratory multivariable models. Assessment of liver metastases density did not predict clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: RECIST 1.1 and ΔSTL predict favourable outcome to regorafenib. In contrast to liver metastases density that failed to be a predictor, lung metastases cavitation represents a novel radiological marker of favourable outcome that deserves consideration. ESMO Open 2017-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5548980/ /pubmed/28848658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000111 Text en © European Society for Medical Oncology (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) [year]. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ricotta, Riccardo Verrioli, Antonella Ghezzi, Silvia Porcu, Luca Grothey, A Falcone, Alfredo Van Cutsem, Eric Argilés, Guillem Adenis, Antoine Ychou, Marc Barone, Carlo Bouché, Olivier Peeters, Marc Humblet, Yves Mineur, Laurent Sobrero, Alberto F Hubbard, Joleen M Cremolini, Chiara Prenen, Hans Tabernero, Josep Jarraya, Hajer Mazard, Thibault Deguelte-Lardiere, Sophie Papadimitriou, Konstantinos Van den Eynde, Marc Pastorino, Alessandro Redaelli, Daniela Bencardino, Katia Funaioli, Chiara Amatu, Alessio Carlo-Stella, Giulia Torri, Valter Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea Vanzulli, Angelo Siena, Salvatore Radiological imaging markers predicting clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib: post hoc analysis of the CORRECT phase III trial (RadioCORRECT study) |
title | Radiological imaging markers predicting clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib: post hoc analysis of the CORRECT phase III trial (RadioCORRECT study) |
title_full | Radiological imaging markers predicting clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib: post hoc analysis of the CORRECT phase III trial (RadioCORRECT study) |
title_fullStr | Radiological imaging markers predicting clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib: post hoc analysis of the CORRECT phase III trial (RadioCORRECT study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiological imaging markers predicting clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib: post hoc analysis of the CORRECT phase III trial (RadioCORRECT study) |
title_short | Radiological imaging markers predicting clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib: post hoc analysis of the CORRECT phase III trial (RadioCORRECT study) |
title_sort | radiological imaging markers predicting clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib: post hoc analysis of the correct phase iii trial (radiocorrect study) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ricottariccardo radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT verrioliantonella radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT ghezzisilvia radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT porculuca radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT grotheya radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT falconealfredo radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT vancutsemeric radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT argilesguillem radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT adenisantoine radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT ychoumarc radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT baronecarlo radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT boucheolivier radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT peetersmarc radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT humbletyves radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT mineurlaurent radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT sobreroalbertof radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT hubbardjoleenm radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT cremolinichiara radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT prenenhans radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT tabernerojosep radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT jarrayahajer radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT mazardthibault radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT degueltelardieresophie radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT papadimitrioukonstantinos radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT vandeneyndemarc radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT pastorinoalessandro radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT redaellidaniela radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT bencardinokatia radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT funaiolichiara radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT amatualessio radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT carlostellagiulia radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT torrivalter radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT sartorebianchiandrea radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT vanzulliangelo radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy AT sienasalvatore radiologicalimagingmarkerspredictingclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomatreatedwithregorafenibposthocanalysisofthecorrectphaseiiitrialradiocorrectstudy |