Cargando…

The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)

BACKGROUND: To estimate the burden of diseases, it is important to consider patient-reported outcomes including Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to provide population-based reference data for the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), stratified by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nickels, Stefan, Schuster, Alexander K., Singer, Susanne, Wild, Philipp S., Laubert-Reh, Dagmar, Schulz, Andreas, Finger, Robert P., Michal, Matthias, Beutel, Manfred E., Münzel, Thomas, Lackner, Karl J., Pfeiffer, Norbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5549396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28789656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7
_version_ 1783255971227762688
author Nickels, Stefan
Schuster, Alexander K.
Singer, Susanne
Wild, Philipp S.
Laubert-Reh, Dagmar
Schulz, Andreas
Finger, Robert P.
Michal, Matthias
Beutel, Manfred E.
Münzel, Thomas
Lackner, Karl J.
Pfeiffer, Norbert
author_facet Nickels, Stefan
Schuster, Alexander K.
Singer, Susanne
Wild, Philipp S.
Laubert-Reh, Dagmar
Schulz, Andreas
Finger, Robert P.
Michal, Matthias
Beutel, Manfred E.
Münzel, Thomas
Lackner, Karl J.
Pfeiffer, Norbert
author_sort Nickels, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To estimate the burden of diseases, it is important to consider patient-reported outcomes including Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to provide population-based reference data for the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), stratified by sex and age. METHODS: The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a population-based, prospective, observational cohort study in Germany, including 15,010 participants aged between 35 and 74. The baseline examination was conducted between 2007 and 2012. To overcome known shortcomings of the NEI VFQ-25, we calculated the previously proposed visual functioning scale and the socio-emotional scale based on Rasch-transformed person-level data. We present mean values, standard deviations and percentiles for age decades stratified by sex. We used a linear regression model to assess the influence of age, sex, socioeconomic status, distance-corrected visual acuity (better-seeing eye) and the absolute difference in distance-corrected visual acuity of both eyes on vision-related QoL. RESULTS: NEI VFQ-25 data are available from 12,231 participants (82%). Both the long-form visual functioning scale (LFVFS) and the long-form socio-emotional scale (LFSES) showed a clear age dependency, with an average LFVFS score of 92.8 for men and 90.5 for women in the youngest age group and 85.7 and 83.4 in the oldest age group, and a LFSES score of 98.3 for men and 98.1 in women in the youngest and 94.7 and 94.5 in the oldest decade. The largest difference was observed between the youngest age group (35–44 years) and the 45–54 years group. Men tended to have slightly higher scores than women. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, age (per 5 years −0.42), female sex (−1.57), worse distance-corrected visual acuity of the better eye (per 0.1 increase in logMAR −2.92) and the difference between both eyes (per 0.1 increase in logMAR −0.87) were associated with a reduced LFVFS score (all p < 0.001). For the LFSES score, we showed that the influence of sex was minor, and that age (per 5 years −0.22), visual acuity of the better eye (−1.65), and the difference between both eyes (−0.56) were associated with a lower score (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We report age- and sex-specific reference data from a large population-based study of mainly Caucasian ethnicity of two unidimensional scores based on Rasch-transformed NEI VFQ-25 data. Vision-related QoL is lower in older and in female individuals. Our results support the association of vision-related QoL not only with the distance-corrected visual acuity of the better eye but also with the difference in visual acuity between each eye. Our findings could be used as a reference for comparison in future studies addressing the influence of eye diseases on vision-related QoL. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5549396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55493962017-08-11 The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) Nickels, Stefan Schuster, Alexander K. Singer, Susanne Wild, Philipp S. Laubert-Reh, Dagmar Schulz, Andreas Finger, Robert P. Michal, Matthias Beutel, Manfred E. Münzel, Thomas Lackner, Karl J. Pfeiffer, Norbert Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To estimate the burden of diseases, it is important to consider patient-reported outcomes including Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to provide population-based reference data for the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), stratified by sex and age. METHODS: The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a population-based, prospective, observational cohort study in Germany, including 15,010 participants aged between 35 and 74. The baseline examination was conducted between 2007 and 2012. To overcome known shortcomings of the NEI VFQ-25, we calculated the previously proposed visual functioning scale and the socio-emotional scale based on Rasch-transformed person-level data. We present mean values, standard deviations and percentiles for age decades stratified by sex. We used a linear regression model to assess the influence of age, sex, socioeconomic status, distance-corrected visual acuity (better-seeing eye) and the absolute difference in distance-corrected visual acuity of both eyes on vision-related QoL. RESULTS: NEI VFQ-25 data are available from 12,231 participants (82%). Both the long-form visual functioning scale (LFVFS) and the long-form socio-emotional scale (LFSES) showed a clear age dependency, with an average LFVFS score of 92.8 for men and 90.5 for women in the youngest age group and 85.7 and 83.4 in the oldest age group, and a LFSES score of 98.3 for men and 98.1 in women in the youngest and 94.7 and 94.5 in the oldest decade. The largest difference was observed between the youngest age group (35–44 years) and the 45–54 years group. Men tended to have slightly higher scores than women. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, age (per 5 years −0.42), female sex (−1.57), worse distance-corrected visual acuity of the better eye (per 0.1 increase in logMAR −2.92) and the difference between both eyes (per 0.1 increase in logMAR −0.87) were associated with a reduced LFVFS score (all p < 0.001). For the LFSES score, we showed that the influence of sex was minor, and that age (per 5 years −0.22), visual acuity of the better eye (−1.65), and the difference between both eyes (−0.56) were associated with a lower score (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We report age- and sex-specific reference data from a large population-based study of mainly Caucasian ethnicity of two unidimensional scores based on Rasch-transformed NEI VFQ-25 data. Vision-related QoL is lower in older and in female individuals. Our results support the association of vision-related QoL not only with the distance-corrected visual acuity of the better eye but also with the difference in visual acuity between each eye. Our findings could be used as a reference for comparison in future studies addressing the influence of eye diseases on vision-related QoL. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5549396/ /pubmed/28789656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nickels, Stefan
Schuster, Alexander K.
Singer, Susanne
Wild, Philipp S.
Laubert-Reh, Dagmar
Schulz, Andreas
Finger, Robert P.
Michal, Matthias
Beutel, Manfred E.
Münzel, Thomas
Lackner, Karl J.
Pfeiffer, Norbert
The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_full The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_fullStr The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_full_unstemmed The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_short The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) – reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)
title_sort national eye institute 25-item visual function questionnaire (nei vfq-25) – reference data from the german population-based gutenberg health study (ghs)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5549396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28789656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nickelsstefan thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT schusteralexanderk thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT singersusanne thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT wildphilipps thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT laubertrehdagmar thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT schulzandreas thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT fingerrobertp thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT michalmatthias thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT beutelmanfrede thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT munzelthomas thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT lacknerkarlj thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT pfeiffernorbert thenationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT nickelsstefan nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT schusteralexanderk nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT singersusanne nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT wildphilipps nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT laubertrehdagmar nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT schulzandreas nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT fingerrobertp nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT michalmatthias nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT beutelmanfrede nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT munzelthomas nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT lacknerkarlj nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs
AT pfeiffernorbert nationaleyeinstitute25itemvisualfunctionquestionnaireneivfq25referencedatafromthegermanpopulationbasedgutenberghealthstudyghs