Cargando…

Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the difference between self-reported hearing status and hearing impairment assessed using conventional audiometry. The associated factors were examined when a concordance between self-reported hearing and audiometric measures was lacking. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, So Young, Kim, Hyung-Jong, Kim, Min-Su, Park, Bumjung, Kim, Jin-Hwan, Choi, Hyo Geun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5549722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28792529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182718
_version_ 1783256018939019264
author Kim, So Young
Kim, Hyung-Jong
Kim, Min-Su
Park, Bumjung
Kim, Jin-Hwan
Choi, Hyo Geun
author_facet Kim, So Young
Kim, Hyung-Jong
Kim, Min-Su
Park, Bumjung
Kim, Jin-Hwan
Choi, Hyo Geun
author_sort Kim, So Young
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the difference between self-reported hearing status and hearing impairment assessed using conventional audiometry. The associated factors were examined when a concordance between self-reported hearing and audiometric measures was lacking. METHODS: In total, 19,642 individuals ≥20 years of age who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys conducted from 2009 through 2012 were enrolled. Pure-tone hearing threshold audiometry (PTA) was measured and classified into three levels: <25 dB (normal hearing); ≥25 dB <40 dB (mild hearing impairment); and ≥40 dB (moderate-to-severe hearing impairment). The self-reported hearing loss was categorized into 3 categories. The participants were categorized into three groups: the concordance (matched between self-reported hearing loss and audiometric PTA), overestimation (higher self-reported hearing loss compared to audiometric PTA), and underestimation groups (lower self-reported hearing loss compared to audiometric PTA). The associations of age, sex, education level, stress level, anxiety/depression, tympanic membrane (TM) status, hearing aid use, and tinnitus with the discrepancy between the hearing self-reported hearing loss and audiometric pure tone threshold results were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression analysis with complex sampling. RESULTS: Overall, 80.1%, 7.1%, and 12.8% of the participants were assigned to the concordance, overestimation, and underestimation groups, respectively. Older age (adjusted odds ratios [AORs] = 1.28 [95% confidence interval = 1.19–1.37] and 2.80 [2.62–2.99] for the overestimation and the underestimation groups, respectively), abnormal TM (2.17 [1.46–3.23] and 1.59 [1.17–2.15]), and tinnitus (2.44 [2.10–2.83] and 1.61 [1.38–1.87]) were positively correlated with both the overestimation and underestimation groups. Compared with specialized workers, service workers, manual workers, and the unemployed were more likely to be in the overestimation group (1.48 [1.11–1.98], 1.39 [1.04–1.86], and 1.50 [1.18–1.90], respectively), and service workers were more likely to be in the underestimation group (AOR = 1.42 [1.01–1.99]). Higher education level (0.77 [0.59–1.01] and 0.43 [0.33–0.57]) and hearing aid use (0.36 [0.17–0.77] and 0.23 [0.13–0.43]) were negatively associated with being in the underestimation group (0.43 [0.37–0.50]). Compared with males, females were less likely to be assigned to the underestimation group (0.43 [0.37–0.50]). Stress (1.98 [1.32–2.98]) and anxiety/depression (1.30 [1.06–1.59]) were associated with overestimation group. CONCLUSION: Older age, lower education level, occupation, abnormal TM, non-hearing aid use, and tinnitus were related to both overestimation and underestimation groups. Male gender was related to underestimation, and stress and anxiety/depression were correlated with overestimation group. An understanding of these factors associated with the self-reported hearing loss will be instrumental to identifying and managing hearing-impaired individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5549722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55497222017-08-12 Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation Kim, So Young Kim, Hyung-Jong Kim, Min-Su Park, Bumjung Kim, Jin-Hwan Choi, Hyo Geun PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the difference between self-reported hearing status and hearing impairment assessed using conventional audiometry. The associated factors were examined when a concordance between self-reported hearing and audiometric measures was lacking. METHODS: In total, 19,642 individuals ≥20 years of age who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys conducted from 2009 through 2012 were enrolled. Pure-tone hearing threshold audiometry (PTA) was measured and classified into three levels: <25 dB (normal hearing); ≥25 dB <40 dB (mild hearing impairment); and ≥40 dB (moderate-to-severe hearing impairment). The self-reported hearing loss was categorized into 3 categories. The participants were categorized into three groups: the concordance (matched between self-reported hearing loss and audiometric PTA), overestimation (higher self-reported hearing loss compared to audiometric PTA), and underestimation groups (lower self-reported hearing loss compared to audiometric PTA). The associations of age, sex, education level, stress level, anxiety/depression, tympanic membrane (TM) status, hearing aid use, and tinnitus with the discrepancy between the hearing self-reported hearing loss and audiometric pure tone threshold results were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression analysis with complex sampling. RESULTS: Overall, 80.1%, 7.1%, and 12.8% of the participants were assigned to the concordance, overestimation, and underestimation groups, respectively. Older age (adjusted odds ratios [AORs] = 1.28 [95% confidence interval = 1.19–1.37] and 2.80 [2.62–2.99] for the overestimation and the underestimation groups, respectively), abnormal TM (2.17 [1.46–3.23] and 1.59 [1.17–2.15]), and tinnitus (2.44 [2.10–2.83] and 1.61 [1.38–1.87]) were positively correlated with both the overestimation and underestimation groups. Compared with specialized workers, service workers, manual workers, and the unemployed were more likely to be in the overestimation group (1.48 [1.11–1.98], 1.39 [1.04–1.86], and 1.50 [1.18–1.90], respectively), and service workers were more likely to be in the underestimation group (AOR = 1.42 [1.01–1.99]). Higher education level (0.77 [0.59–1.01] and 0.43 [0.33–0.57]) and hearing aid use (0.36 [0.17–0.77] and 0.23 [0.13–0.43]) were negatively associated with being in the underestimation group (0.43 [0.37–0.50]). Compared with males, females were less likely to be assigned to the underestimation group (0.43 [0.37–0.50]). Stress (1.98 [1.32–2.98]) and anxiety/depression (1.30 [1.06–1.59]) were associated with overestimation group. CONCLUSION: Older age, lower education level, occupation, abnormal TM, non-hearing aid use, and tinnitus were related to both overestimation and underestimation groups. Male gender was related to underestimation, and stress and anxiety/depression were correlated with overestimation group. An understanding of these factors associated with the self-reported hearing loss will be instrumental to identifying and managing hearing-impaired individuals. Public Library of Science 2017-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5549722/ /pubmed/28792529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182718 Text en © 2017 Kim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, So Young
Kim, Hyung-Jong
Kim, Min-Su
Park, Bumjung
Kim, Jin-Hwan
Choi, Hyo Geun
Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation
title Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation
title_full Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation
title_fullStr Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation
title_short Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation
title_sort discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5549722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28792529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182718
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsoyoung discrepancybetweenselfassessedhearingstatusandmeasuredaudiometricevaluation
AT kimhyungjong discrepancybetweenselfassessedhearingstatusandmeasuredaudiometricevaluation
AT kimminsu discrepancybetweenselfassessedhearingstatusandmeasuredaudiometricevaluation
AT parkbumjung discrepancybetweenselfassessedhearingstatusandmeasuredaudiometricevaluation
AT kimjinhwan discrepancybetweenselfassessedhearingstatusandmeasuredaudiometricevaluation
AT choihyogeun discrepancybetweenselfassessedhearingstatusandmeasuredaudiometricevaluation