Cargando…
Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures – Design of a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate abdominal closure techniques INSECT-Trial [ISRCTN24023541]
BACKGROUND: The closure of the abdomen after median laparotomy is still a matter of debate among surgeons. Further well designed and performed randomised controlled trials determining the optimal method of abdominal fascial closure are needed. DESIGN: This is a three armed, multi-centre, intra-opera...
Autores principales: | Knaebel, Hanns-Peter, Koch, Moritz, Sauerland, Stefan, Diener, Markus K, Büchler, Markus W, Seiler, Christoph M |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC554977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15755324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-5-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
To whom do the results of the multicenter, randomized, controlled INSECT trial (ISRCTN 24023541) apply? - assessment of external validity
por: Fischer, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Postsurgical pain outcome of vertical and transverse abdominal incision: Design of a randomized controlled equivalence trial [ISRCTN60734227]
por: Reidel, Margot A, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MonoMax® suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy—a controlled prospective multicentre trial: ISSAAC [NCT005725079]
por: Albertsmeier, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Comparison of Venae Sectio vs. modified Seldinger Technique for Totally Implantable Access Ports; Portas-trial [ISRCTN:52368201]
por: Knebel, P, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(® )suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079]
por: Fischer, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2008)