Cargando…

Identifying Subpopulations with Distinct Response to Treatment Using Plasma Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure: Results from the PROTECT Trial: Differential Response in Acute Heart Failure

BACKGROUND: Over the last 50 years, clinical trials of novel interventions for acute heart failure (AHF) have, with few exceptions, been neutral or shown harm. We hypothesize that this might be related to a differential response to pharmacological therapy. METHODS: We studied the magnitude of treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Licette C. Y., Valente, Mattia A. E., Postmus, Douwe, O’Connor, Christopher M., Metra, Marco, Dittrich, Howard C., Ponikowski, Piotr, Teerlink, John R., Cotter, Gad, Davison, Beth, Cleland, John G. F., Givertz, Michael M., Bloomfield, Daniel M., van Veldhuisen, Dirk J., Hillege, Hans L., van der Meer, Peter, Voors, Adriaan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10557-017-6726-1
_version_ 1783256149245558784
author Liu, Licette C. Y.
Valente, Mattia A. E.
Postmus, Douwe
O’Connor, Christopher M.
Metra, Marco
Dittrich, Howard C.
Ponikowski, Piotr
Teerlink, John R.
Cotter, Gad
Davison, Beth
Cleland, John G. F.
Givertz, Michael M.
Bloomfield, Daniel M.
van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
Hillege, Hans L.
van der Meer, Peter
Voors, Adriaan A.
author_facet Liu, Licette C. Y.
Valente, Mattia A. E.
Postmus, Douwe
O’Connor, Christopher M.
Metra, Marco
Dittrich, Howard C.
Ponikowski, Piotr
Teerlink, John R.
Cotter, Gad
Davison, Beth
Cleland, John G. F.
Givertz, Michael M.
Bloomfield, Daniel M.
van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
Hillege, Hans L.
van der Meer, Peter
Voors, Adriaan A.
author_sort Liu, Licette C. Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last 50 years, clinical trials of novel interventions for acute heart failure (AHF) have, with few exceptions, been neutral or shown harm. We hypothesize that this might be related to a differential response to pharmacological therapy. METHODS: We studied the magnitude of treatment effect of rolofylline across clinical characteristics and plasma biomarkers in 2033 AHF patients and derived a biomarker-based responder sum score model. Treatment response was survival from all-cause mortality through day 180. RESULTS: In the overall study population, rolofylline had no effect on mortality (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82–1.28, p = 0.808). We found no treatment interaction across clinical characteristics, but we found interactions between several biomarkers and rolofylline. The biomarker-based sum score model included TNF-R1α, ST2, WAP four-disulfide core domain protein HE4 (WAP-4C), and total cholesterol, and the score ranged between 0 and 4. In patients with score 4 (those with increased TNF-R1α, ST2, WAP-4C, and low total cholesterol), treatment with rolofylline was beneficial (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–0.92, p = 0.019). In patients with score 0, treatment with rolofylline was harmful (HR 5.52, 95% CI 1.68–18.13, p = 0.005; treatment by score interaction p < 0.001). Internal validation estimated similar hazard ratio estimates (0 points: HR 5.56, 95% CI 5.27–7–5.87; 1 point: HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.25–1.33; 2 points: HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.74–0.76; 3 points: HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11–1.15; 4 points, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.61–0.62) compared to the original data. CONCLUSION: Biomarkers are superior to clinical characteristics to study treatment heterogeneity in acute heart failure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10557-017-6726-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5550531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55505312017-08-24 Identifying Subpopulations with Distinct Response to Treatment Using Plasma Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure: Results from the PROTECT Trial: Differential Response in Acute Heart Failure Liu, Licette C. Y. Valente, Mattia A. E. Postmus, Douwe O’Connor, Christopher M. Metra, Marco Dittrich, Howard C. Ponikowski, Piotr Teerlink, John R. Cotter, Gad Davison, Beth Cleland, John G. F. Givertz, Michael M. Bloomfield, Daniel M. van Veldhuisen, Dirk J. Hillege, Hans L. van der Meer, Peter Voors, Adriaan A. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Original Article BACKGROUND: Over the last 50 years, clinical trials of novel interventions for acute heart failure (AHF) have, with few exceptions, been neutral or shown harm. We hypothesize that this might be related to a differential response to pharmacological therapy. METHODS: We studied the magnitude of treatment effect of rolofylline across clinical characteristics and plasma biomarkers in 2033 AHF patients and derived a biomarker-based responder sum score model. Treatment response was survival from all-cause mortality through day 180. RESULTS: In the overall study population, rolofylline had no effect on mortality (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82–1.28, p = 0.808). We found no treatment interaction across clinical characteristics, but we found interactions between several biomarkers and rolofylline. The biomarker-based sum score model included TNF-R1α, ST2, WAP four-disulfide core domain protein HE4 (WAP-4C), and total cholesterol, and the score ranged between 0 and 4. In patients with score 4 (those with increased TNF-R1α, ST2, WAP-4C, and low total cholesterol), treatment with rolofylline was beneficial (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–0.92, p = 0.019). In patients with score 0, treatment with rolofylline was harmful (HR 5.52, 95% CI 1.68–18.13, p = 0.005; treatment by score interaction p < 0.001). Internal validation estimated similar hazard ratio estimates (0 points: HR 5.56, 95% CI 5.27–7–5.87; 1 point: HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.25–1.33; 2 points: HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.74–0.76; 3 points: HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11–1.15; 4 points, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.61–0.62) compared to the original data. CONCLUSION: Biomarkers are superior to clinical characteristics to study treatment heterogeneity in acute heart failure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10557-017-6726-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-06-27 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5550531/ /pubmed/28656542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10557-017-6726-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Liu, Licette C. Y.
Valente, Mattia A. E.
Postmus, Douwe
O’Connor, Christopher M.
Metra, Marco
Dittrich, Howard C.
Ponikowski, Piotr
Teerlink, John R.
Cotter, Gad
Davison, Beth
Cleland, John G. F.
Givertz, Michael M.
Bloomfield, Daniel M.
van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
Hillege, Hans L.
van der Meer, Peter
Voors, Adriaan A.
Identifying Subpopulations with Distinct Response to Treatment Using Plasma Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure: Results from the PROTECT Trial: Differential Response in Acute Heart Failure
title Identifying Subpopulations with Distinct Response to Treatment Using Plasma Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure: Results from the PROTECT Trial: Differential Response in Acute Heart Failure
title_full Identifying Subpopulations with Distinct Response to Treatment Using Plasma Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure: Results from the PROTECT Trial: Differential Response in Acute Heart Failure
title_fullStr Identifying Subpopulations with Distinct Response to Treatment Using Plasma Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure: Results from the PROTECT Trial: Differential Response in Acute Heart Failure
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Subpopulations with Distinct Response to Treatment Using Plasma Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure: Results from the PROTECT Trial: Differential Response in Acute Heart Failure
title_short Identifying Subpopulations with Distinct Response to Treatment Using Plasma Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure: Results from the PROTECT Trial: Differential Response in Acute Heart Failure
title_sort identifying subpopulations with distinct response to treatment using plasma biomarkers in acute heart failure: results from the protect trial: differential response in acute heart failure
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10557-017-6726-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liulicettecy identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT valentemattiaae identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT postmusdouwe identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT oconnorchristopherm identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT metramarco identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT dittrichhowardc identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT ponikowskipiotr identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT teerlinkjohnr identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT cottergad identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT davisonbeth identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT clelandjohngf identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT givertzmichaelm identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT bloomfielddanielm identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT vanveldhuisendirkj identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT hillegehansl identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT vandermeerpeter identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure
AT voorsadriaana identifyingsubpopulationswithdistinctresponsetotreatmentusingplasmabiomarkersinacuteheartfailureresultsfromtheprotecttrialdifferentialresponseinacuteheartfailure