Cargando…
Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation
The presence of a light flash near to the body not only increases the ability to detect a weak touch but also increases reports of feeling a weak touch that did not occur. The somatic signal detection task (SSDT) provides a behavioural marker by which to clarify the spatial extent of such visuotacti...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4998-0 |
_version_ | 1783256151944593408 |
---|---|
author | Mirams, Laura Poliakoff, Ellen Lloyd, Donna M. |
author_facet | Mirams, Laura Poliakoff, Ellen Lloyd, Donna M. |
author_sort | Mirams, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | The presence of a light flash near to the body not only increases the ability to detect a weak touch but also increases reports of feeling a weak touch that did not occur. The somatic signal detection task (SSDT) provides a behavioural marker by which to clarify the spatial extent of such visuotactile interactions in peripersonal space. Whilst previous evidence suggests a limit to the spatial extent over which visual input can distort the perception of tactile stimulation during the rubber hand illusion, the spatial boundaries of light-induced tactile sensations are not known. In a repeated measures design, 41 participants completed the SSDT with the light positioned 1 cm (near), 17.5 cm (mid) or 40 cm (far) from the tactile stimulation. In the far condition, the light did not affect hit, or false alarm rates during the SSDT. In the near and mid conditions, the light significantly increased hit rates and led to a more liberal response criterion, that is, participants reported feeling the touch more often regardless of whether or not it actually occurred. Our results demonstrate a spatial boundary over which visual input influences veridical and non-veridical touch perception during the SSDT, and provide further behavioural evidence to show that the boundaries of the receptive fields of visuotactile neurons may be limited to reach space. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5550542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55505422017-08-25 Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation Mirams, Laura Poliakoff, Ellen Lloyd, Donna M. Exp Brain Res Research Article The presence of a light flash near to the body not only increases the ability to detect a weak touch but also increases reports of feeling a weak touch that did not occur. The somatic signal detection task (SSDT) provides a behavioural marker by which to clarify the spatial extent of such visuotactile interactions in peripersonal space. Whilst previous evidence suggests a limit to the spatial extent over which visual input can distort the perception of tactile stimulation during the rubber hand illusion, the spatial boundaries of light-induced tactile sensations are not known. In a repeated measures design, 41 participants completed the SSDT with the light positioned 1 cm (near), 17.5 cm (mid) or 40 cm (far) from the tactile stimulation. In the far condition, the light did not affect hit, or false alarm rates during the SSDT. In the near and mid conditions, the light significantly increased hit rates and led to a more liberal response criterion, that is, participants reported feeling the touch more often regardless of whether or not it actually occurred. Our results demonstrate a spatial boundary over which visual input influences veridical and non-veridical touch perception during the SSDT, and provide further behavioural evidence to show that the boundaries of the receptive fields of visuotactile neurons may be limited to reach space. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-05-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5550542/ /pubmed/28560494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4998-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mirams, Laura Poliakoff, Ellen Lloyd, Donna M. Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation |
title | Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation |
title_full | Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation |
title_fullStr | Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation |
title_short | Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation |
title_sort | spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4998-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miramslaura spatiallimitsofvisuotactileinteractionsinthepresenceandabsenceoftactilestimulation AT poliakoffellen spatiallimitsofvisuotactileinteractionsinthepresenceandabsenceoftactilestimulation AT lloyddonnam spatiallimitsofvisuotactileinteractionsinthepresenceandabsenceoftactilestimulation |