Cargando…

Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation

The presence of a light flash near to the body not only increases the ability to detect a weak touch but also increases reports of feeling a weak touch that did not occur. The somatic signal detection task (SSDT) provides a behavioural marker by which to clarify the spatial extent of such visuotacti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirams, Laura, Poliakoff, Ellen, Lloyd, Donna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4998-0
_version_ 1783256151944593408
author Mirams, Laura
Poliakoff, Ellen
Lloyd, Donna M.
author_facet Mirams, Laura
Poliakoff, Ellen
Lloyd, Donna M.
author_sort Mirams, Laura
collection PubMed
description The presence of a light flash near to the body not only increases the ability to detect a weak touch but also increases reports of feeling a weak touch that did not occur. The somatic signal detection task (SSDT) provides a behavioural marker by which to clarify the spatial extent of such visuotactile interactions in peripersonal space. Whilst previous evidence suggests a limit to the spatial extent over which visual input can distort the perception of tactile stimulation during the rubber hand illusion, the spatial boundaries of light-induced tactile sensations are not known. In a repeated measures design, 41 participants completed the SSDT with the light positioned 1 cm (near), 17.5 cm (mid) or 40 cm (far) from the tactile stimulation. In the far condition, the light did not affect hit, or false alarm rates during the SSDT. In the near and mid conditions, the light significantly increased hit rates and led to a more liberal response criterion, that is, participants reported feeling the touch more often regardless of whether or not it actually occurred. Our results demonstrate a spatial boundary over which visual input influences veridical and non-veridical touch perception during the SSDT, and provide further behavioural evidence to show that the boundaries of the receptive fields of visuotactile neurons may be limited to reach space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5550542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55505422017-08-25 Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation Mirams, Laura Poliakoff, Ellen Lloyd, Donna M. Exp Brain Res Research Article The presence of a light flash near to the body not only increases the ability to detect a weak touch but also increases reports of feeling a weak touch that did not occur. The somatic signal detection task (SSDT) provides a behavioural marker by which to clarify the spatial extent of such visuotactile interactions in peripersonal space. Whilst previous evidence suggests a limit to the spatial extent over which visual input can distort the perception of tactile stimulation during the rubber hand illusion, the spatial boundaries of light-induced tactile sensations are not known. In a repeated measures design, 41 participants completed the SSDT with the light positioned 1 cm (near), 17.5 cm (mid) or 40 cm (far) from the tactile stimulation. In the far condition, the light did not affect hit, or false alarm rates during the SSDT. In the near and mid conditions, the light significantly increased hit rates and led to a more liberal response criterion, that is, participants reported feeling the touch more often regardless of whether or not it actually occurred. Our results demonstrate a spatial boundary over which visual input influences veridical and non-veridical touch perception during the SSDT, and provide further behavioural evidence to show that the boundaries of the receptive fields of visuotactile neurons may be limited to reach space. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-05-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5550542/ /pubmed/28560494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4998-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mirams, Laura
Poliakoff, Ellen
Lloyd, Donna M.
Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation
title Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation
title_full Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation
title_fullStr Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation
title_short Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation
title_sort spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4998-0
work_keys_str_mv AT miramslaura spatiallimitsofvisuotactileinteractionsinthepresenceandabsenceoftactilestimulation
AT poliakoffellen spatiallimitsofvisuotactileinteractionsinthepresenceandabsenceoftactilestimulation
AT lloyddonnam spatiallimitsofvisuotactileinteractionsinthepresenceandabsenceoftactilestimulation