Cargando…
Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments
Time-to-collision (TTC) underestimation has been interpreted as an adaptive response that allows observers to have more time to engage in a defensive behaviour. This bias seems, therefore, strongly linked to action preparation. There is evidence that the observer’s physical fitness modulates the und...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28608244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5008-2 |
_version_ | 1783256152934449152 |
---|---|
author | Vagnoni, Eleonora Andreanidou, Vasiliki Lourenco, Stella F. Longo, Matthew R. |
author_facet | Vagnoni, Eleonora Andreanidou, Vasiliki Lourenco, Stella F. Longo, Matthew R. |
author_sort | Vagnoni, Eleonora |
collection | PubMed |
description | Time-to-collision (TTC) underestimation has been interpreted as an adaptive response that allows observers to have more time to engage in a defensive behaviour. This bias seems, therefore, strongly linked to action preparation. There is evidence that the observer’s physical fitness modulates the underestimation effect so that people who need more time to react (i.e. those with less physical fitness) show a stronger underestimation effect. Here we investigated whether this bias is influenced by the momentary action capability of the observers. In the first experiment, participants estimated the time-to-collision of threatening or non-threatening stimuli while being mildly immobilized (with a chin rest) or while standing freely. Having reduced the possibility of movement led participants to show more underestimation of the approaching stimuli. However, this effect was not stronger for threatening relative to non-threatening stimuli. The effect of the action capability found in the first experiment could be interpreted as an expansion of peripersonal space (PPS). In the second experiment, we thus investigated the generality of this effect using an established paradigm to measure the size of peripersonal space. Participants bisected lines from different distances while in the chin rest or standing freely. The results replicated the classic left-to-right gradient in lateral spatial attention with increasing viewing distance, but no effect of immobilization was found. The manipulation of the momentary action capability of the observers influenced the participants’ performance in the TTC task but not in the line bisection task. These results are discussed in relation to the different functions of PPS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5550546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55505462017-08-25 Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments Vagnoni, Eleonora Andreanidou, Vasiliki Lourenco, Stella F. Longo, Matthew R. Exp Brain Res Research Article Time-to-collision (TTC) underestimation has been interpreted as an adaptive response that allows observers to have more time to engage in a defensive behaviour. This bias seems, therefore, strongly linked to action preparation. There is evidence that the observer’s physical fitness modulates the underestimation effect so that people who need more time to react (i.e. those with less physical fitness) show a stronger underestimation effect. Here we investigated whether this bias is influenced by the momentary action capability of the observers. In the first experiment, participants estimated the time-to-collision of threatening or non-threatening stimuli while being mildly immobilized (with a chin rest) or while standing freely. Having reduced the possibility of movement led participants to show more underestimation of the approaching stimuli. However, this effect was not stronger for threatening relative to non-threatening stimuli. The effect of the action capability found in the first experiment could be interpreted as an expansion of peripersonal space (PPS). In the second experiment, we thus investigated the generality of this effect using an established paradigm to measure the size of peripersonal space. Participants bisected lines from different distances while in the chin rest or standing freely. The results replicated the classic left-to-right gradient in lateral spatial attention with increasing viewing distance, but no effect of immobilization was found. The manipulation of the momentary action capability of the observers influenced the participants’ performance in the TTC task but not in the line bisection task. These results are discussed in relation to the different functions of PPS. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-06-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5550546/ /pubmed/28608244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5008-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vagnoni, Eleonora Andreanidou, Vasiliki Lourenco, Stella F. Longo, Matthew R. Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments |
title | Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments |
title_full | Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments |
title_fullStr | Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments |
title_full_unstemmed | Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments |
title_short | Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments |
title_sort | action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28608244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5008-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vagnonieleonora actionabilitymodulatestimetocollisionjudgments AT andreanidouvasiliki actionabilitymodulatestimetocollisionjudgments AT lourencostellaf actionabilitymodulatestimetocollisionjudgments AT longomatthewr actionabilitymodulatestimetocollisionjudgments |