Cargando…
Can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of Alzheimer’s and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation?
BACKGROUND: Neuropsychological testing is considered crucial for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). In-depth neuropsychological assessment revealed specific dysfunctions in the two dementia syndromes. However, a significant ove...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28793933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0287-1 |
_version_ | 1783256222601838592 |
---|---|
author | Reul, Sophia Lohmann, Hubertus Wiendl, Heinz Duning, Thomas Johnen, Andreas |
author_facet | Reul, Sophia Lohmann, Hubertus Wiendl, Heinz Duning, Thomas Johnen, Andreas |
author_sort | Reul, Sophia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neuropsychological testing is considered crucial for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). In-depth neuropsychological assessment revealed specific dysfunctions in the two dementia syndromes. However, a significant overlap of cognitive impairments exists in early disease stages. We questioned whether a standard neuropsychological assessment at initial clinical presentation can delineate patients with AD versus bvFTD. METHODS: In a retrospective approach, we evaluated and compared how cognitive profiles assessed at initial clinical presentation predicted the diagnosis of later verified AD (n = 43) and bvFTD (n = 26). Additionally, the neuropsychological standard domains memory, language, visuospatial skills, executive functions, praxis and social cognition were subjected to stepwise discriminant analysis to compare their differential contribution to diagnosis. RESULTS: Regardless of diagnosis, a percentage of patients presented with major deterioration in a wide range of cognitive domains when compared with age-matched normative data. Only few significant differences were detected on the group level: Patients with AD were relatively more impaired in the verbal recall, verbal recognition, figure copy, and surprisingly in the executive subdomains, set shifting and processing speed whereas bvFTD was characterised by more deficits in imitation of face postures. A combination of tests for verbal recall, imitation of limb and face postures, and figure copy showed the greatest discriminatory power. CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that the contribution of a standard neuropsychological assessment is limited for differential diagnosis of AD and bvFTD at initial presentation. In contrast to current clinical guidelines, executive functions are neither particularly nor exclusively impaired in patients with bvFTD when assessed within a standard clinical neuropsychological test battery. The significant overlap of bvFTD and AD concerning the profile of cognitive impairments questions current neuropsychological diagnostic criteria and calls for revision, regarding both the degree and the profile of cognitive deficits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5550986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55509862017-08-14 Can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of Alzheimer’s and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation? Reul, Sophia Lohmann, Hubertus Wiendl, Heinz Duning, Thomas Johnen, Andreas Alzheimers Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Neuropsychological testing is considered crucial for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). In-depth neuropsychological assessment revealed specific dysfunctions in the two dementia syndromes. However, a significant overlap of cognitive impairments exists in early disease stages. We questioned whether a standard neuropsychological assessment at initial clinical presentation can delineate patients with AD versus bvFTD. METHODS: In a retrospective approach, we evaluated and compared how cognitive profiles assessed at initial clinical presentation predicted the diagnosis of later verified AD (n = 43) and bvFTD (n = 26). Additionally, the neuropsychological standard domains memory, language, visuospatial skills, executive functions, praxis and social cognition were subjected to stepwise discriminant analysis to compare their differential contribution to diagnosis. RESULTS: Regardless of diagnosis, a percentage of patients presented with major deterioration in a wide range of cognitive domains when compared with age-matched normative data. Only few significant differences were detected on the group level: Patients with AD were relatively more impaired in the verbal recall, verbal recognition, figure copy, and surprisingly in the executive subdomains, set shifting and processing speed whereas bvFTD was characterised by more deficits in imitation of face postures. A combination of tests for verbal recall, imitation of limb and face postures, and figure copy showed the greatest discriminatory power. CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that the contribution of a standard neuropsychological assessment is limited for differential diagnosis of AD and bvFTD at initial presentation. In contrast to current clinical guidelines, executive functions are neither particularly nor exclusively impaired in patients with bvFTD when assessed within a standard clinical neuropsychological test battery. The significant overlap of bvFTD and AD concerning the profile of cognitive impairments questions current neuropsychological diagnostic criteria and calls for revision, regarding both the degree and the profile of cognitive deficits. BioMed Central 2017-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5550986/ /pubmed/28793933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0287-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Reul, Sophia Lohmann, Hubertus Wiendl, Heinz Duning, Thomas Johnen, Andreas Can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of Alzheimer’s and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation? |
title | Can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of Alzheimer’s and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation? |
title_full | Can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of Alzheimer’s and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation? |
title_fullStr | Can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of Alzheimer’s and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of Alzheimer’s and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation? |
title_short | Can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of Alzheimer’s and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation? |
title_sort | can cognitive assessment really discriminate early stages of alzheimer’s and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia at initial clinical presentation? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28793933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0287-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reulsophia cancognitiveassessmentreallydiscriminateearlystagesofalzheimersandbehaviouralvariantfrontotemporaldementiaatinitialclinicalpresentation AT lohmannhubertus cancognitiveassessmentreallydiscriminateearlystagesofalzheimersandbehaviouralvariantfrontotemporaldementiaatinitialclinicalpresentation AT wiendlheinz cancognitiveassessmentreallydiscriminateearlystagesofalzheimersandbehaviouralvariantfrontotemporaldementiaatinitialclinicalpresentation AT duningthomas cancognitiveassessmentreallydiscriminateearlystagesofalzheimersandbehaviouralvariantfrontotemporaldementiaatinitialclinicalpresentation AT johnenandreas cancognitiveassessmentreallydiscriminateearlystagesofalzheimersandbehaviouralvariantfrontotemporaldementiaatinitialclinicalpresentation |