Cargando…

Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus

BACKGROUND: In countries such as Cyprus the financial crisis and the recession have severely affected the funding and priority setting of the health care system. There is evidence highlighting the importance of population’ preferences in designing priorities for health care settings. Although public...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farmakas, Antonis, Theodorou, Mamas, Galanis, Petros, Karayiannis, Georgios, Ghobrial, Stefanos, Polyzos, Nikos, Papastavrou, Evridiki, Agapidaki, Eirini, Souliotis, Kyriakos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-017-0078-3
_version_ 1783256236060311552
author Farmakas, Antonis
Theodorou, Mamas
Galanis, Petros
Karayiannis, Georgios
Ghobrial, Stefanos
Polyzos, Nikos
Papastavrou, Evridiki
Agapidaki, Eirini
Souliotis, Kyriakos
author_facet Farmakas, Antonis
Theodorou, Mamas
Galanis, Petros
Karayiannis, Georgios
Ghobrial, Stefanos
Polyzos, Nikos
Papastavrou, Evridiki
Agapidaki, Eirini
Souliotis, Kyriakos
author_sort Farmakas, Antonis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In countries such as Cyprus the financial crisis and the recession have severely affected the funding and priority setting of the health care system. There is evidence highlighting the importance of population’ preferences in designing priorities for health care settings. Although public preferences have been thorough analysed in many countries, there is a research gap in terms of simultaneously investigating the relative importance and the weight of differing and competing criteria for determining healthcare priority settings. The main objective of the study was tο investigate public preferences for the relative utility and weight of differing and competing criteria for health care priority setting in Cyprus. METHODS: The ‘conjoint analysis’ technique was applied to develop a ranking exercise. The aim of the study was to identify the preferences of the participants for alternative options. Participants were asked to grade in a priority order 16 hypothetical case scenarios of patients with different disease and of diverse socio-economic characteristics awaiting treatment. The sample was purposive and consisted of 100 Cypriots, selected from public locations all over the country. RESULTS: It was revealed that the “severity of the disease” and the “age of the patient” were the key prioritization criteria. Participants assigned the smallest relative value to the criterion “healthy lifestyle”. More precisely, participants older than 35 years old assigned higher relative importance to “age”, while younger participants to the “severity of the disease”. The “healthy lifestyle” criterion was assigned to the lowest relative importance to by all participants. CONCLUSION: In Cyprus, public participation in health care priority setting is almost inexistent. Nonetheless, it seems that the public’s participation in this process could lead to a wider acceptance of the healthcare system especially as a result of the financial crisis and the upcoming reforms implemented such as the establishment of the General System of Health Insurance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5551077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55510772017-08-14 Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus Farmakas, Antonis Theodorou, Mamas Galanis, Petros Karayiannis, Georgios Ghobrial, Stefanos Polyzos, Nikos Papastavrou, Evridiki Agapidaki, Eirini Souliotis, Kyriakos Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: In countries such as Cyprus the financial crisis and the recession have severely affected the funding and priority setting of the health care system. There is evidence highlighting the importance of population’ preferences in designing priorities for health care settings. Although public preferences have been thorough analysed in many countries, there is a research gap in terms of simultaneously investigating the relative importance and the weight of differing and competing criteria for determining healthcare priority settings. The main objective of the study was tο investigate public preferences for the relative utility and weight of differing and competing criteria for health care priority setting in Cyprus. METHODS: The ‘conjoint analysis’ technique was applied to develop a ranking exercise. The aim of the study was to identify the preferences of the participants for alternative options. Participants were asked to grade in a priority order 16 hypothetical case scenarios of patients with different disease and of diverse socio-economic characteristics awaiting treatment. The sample was purposive and consisted of 100 Cypriots, selected from public locations all over the country. RESULTS: It was revealed that the “severity of the disease” and the “age of the patient” were the key prioritization criteria. Participants assigned the smallest relative value to the criterion “healthy lifestyle”. More precisely, participants older than 35 years old assigned higher relative importance to “age”, while younger participants to the “severity of the disease”. The “healthy lifestyle” criterion was assigned to the lowest relative importance to by all participants. CONCLUSION: In Cyprus, public participation in health care priority setting is almost inexistent. Nonetheless, it seems that the public’s participation in this process could lead to a wider acceptance of the healthcare system especially as a result of the financial crisis and the upcoming reforms implemented such as the establishment of the General System of Health Insurance. BioMed Central 2017-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5551077/ /pubmed/28808427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-017-0078-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Farmakas, Antonis
Theodorou, Mamas
Galanis, Petros
Karayiannis, Georgios
Ghobrial, Stefanos
Polyzos, Nikos
Papastavrou, Evridiki
Agapidaki, Eirini
Souliotis, Kyriakos
Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus
title Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus
title_full Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus
title_fullStr Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus
title_full_unstemmed Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus
title_short Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus
title_sort public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in cyprus
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-017-0078-3
work_keys_str_mv AT farmakasantonis publicengagementinsettinghealthcareprioritiesarankingexerciseincyprus
AT theodoroumamas publicengagementinsettinghealthcareprioritiesarankingexerciseincyprus
AT galanispetros publicengagementinsettinghealthcareprioritiesarankingexerciseincyprus
AT karayiannisgeorgios publicengagementinsettinghealthcareprioritiesarankingexerciseincyprus
AT ghobrialstefanos publicengagementinsettinghealthcareprioritiesarankingexerciseincyprus
AT polyzosnikos publicengagementinsettinghealthcareprioritiesarankingexerciseincyprus
AT papastavrouevridiki publicengagementinsettinghealthcareprioritiesarankingexerciseincyprus
AT agapidakieirini publicengagementinsettinghealthcareprioritiesarankingexerciseincyprus
AT souliotiskyriakos publicengagementinsettinghealthcareprioritiesarankingexerciseincyprus