Cargando…
The Indirect Efficacy Comparison of DNA Methylation in Sputum for Early Screening and Auxiliary Detection of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Background: DNA methylation in sputum has been an attractive candidate biomarker for the non-invasive screening and detection of lung cancer. Materials and Methods: Databases including PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane library, Web of Science databases, Chinese Biological Medicine (CBM), Chinese National Knowl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28644424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070679 |
_version_ | 1783256245662121984 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Di Peng, Hongli Sun, Qi Zhao, Zhongyao Yu, Xinwei Ge, Siqi Wang, Hao Fang, Honghong Gao, Qing Liu, Jiaonan Wu, Lijuan Song, Manshu Wang, Youxin |
author_facet | Liu, Di Peng, Hongli Sun, Qi Zhao, Zhongyao Yu, Xinwei Ge, Siqi Wang, Hao Fang, Honghong Gao, Qing Liu, Jiaonan Wu, Lijuan Song, Manshu Wang, Youxin |
author_sort | Liu, Di |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: DNA methylation in sputum has been an attractive candidate biomarker for the non-invasive screening and detection of lung cancer. Materials and Methods: Databases including PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane library, Web of Science databases, Chinese Biological Medicine (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Vip Databases and Google Scholar were searched to collect the diagnostic trials on aberrant DNA methylation in the screening and detection of lung cancer published until 1 December 2016. Indirect comparison meta-analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the included candidate genes. Results: The systematic literature search yielded a total of 33 studies including a total of 4801 subjects (2238 patients with lung cancer and 2563 controls) and covering 32 genes. We identified that methylated genes in sputum samples for the early screening and auxiliary detection of lung cancer yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.46 (0.41–0.50) and specificity of 0.83 (0.80–0.86). Combined indirect comparisons identified the superior gene of SOX17 (sensitivity: 0.84, specificity: 0.88), CDO1 (sensitivity: 0.78, specificity: 0.67), ZFP42 (sensitivity: 0.87, specificity: 0.63) and TAC1 (sensitivity: 0.86, specificity: 0.75). Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrates that methylated SOX17, CDO1, ZFP42, TAC1, FAM19A4, FHIT, MGMT, p16, and RASSF1A are potential superior biomarkers for the screening and auxiliary detection of lung cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5551117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55511172017-08-11 The Indirect Efficacy Comparison of DNA Methylation in Sputum for Early Screening and Auxiliary Detection of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Liu, Di Peng, Hongli Sun, Qi Zhao, Zhongyao Yu, Xinwei Ge, Siqi Wang, Hao Fang, Honghong Gao, Qing Liu, Jiaonan Wu, Lijuan Song, Manshu Wang, Youxin Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: DNA methylation in sputum has been an attractive candidate biomarker for the non-invasive screening and detection of lung cancer. Materials and Methods: Databases including PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane library, Web of Science databases, Chinese Biological Medicine (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Vip Databases and Google Scholar were searched to collect the diagnostic trials on aberrant DNA methylation in the screening and detection of lung cancer published until 1 December 2016. Indirect comparison meta-analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the included candidate genes. Results: The systematic literature search yielded a total of 33 studies including a total of 4801 subjects (2238 patients with lung cancer and 2563 controls) and covering 32 genes. We identified that methylated genes in sputum samples for the early screening and auxiliary detection of lung cancer yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.46 (0.41–0.50) and specificity of 0.83 (0.80–0.86). Combined indirect comparisons identified the superior gene of SOX17 (sensitivity: 0.84, specificity: 0.88), CDO1 (sensitivity: 0.78, specificity: 0.67), ZFP42 (sensitivity: 0.87, specificity: 0.63) and TAC1 (sensitivity: 0.86, specificity: 0.75). Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrates that methylated SOX17, CDO1, ZFP42, TAC1, FAM19A4, FHIT, MGMT, p16, and RASSF1A are potential superior biomarkers for the screening and auxiliary detection of lung cancer. MDPI 2017-06-23 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5551117/ /pubmed/28644424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070679 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Liu, Di Peng, Hongli Sun, Qi Zhao, Zhongyao Yu, Xinwei Ge, Siqi Wang, Hao Fang, Honghong Gao, Qing Liu, Jiaonan Wu, Lijuan Song, Manshu Wang, Youxin The Indirect Efficacy Comparison of DNA Methylation in Sputum for Early Screening and Auxiliary Detection of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title | The Indirect Efficacy Comparison of DNA Methylation in Sputum for Early Screening and Auxiliary Detection of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Indirect Efficacy Comparison of DNA Methylation in Sputum for Early Screening and Auxiliary Detection of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Indirect Efficacy Comparison of DNA Methylation in Sputum for Early Screening and Auxiliary Detection of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Indirect Efficacy Comparison of DNA Methylation in Sputum for Early Screening and Auxiliary Detection of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Indirect Efficacy Comparison of DNA Methylation in Sputum for Early Screening and Auxiliary Detection of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | indirect efficacy comparison of dna methylation in sputum for early screening and auxiliary detection of lung cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28644424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070679 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liudi theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT penghongli theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT sunqi theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT zhaozhongyao theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT yuxinwei theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT gesiqi theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT wanghao theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT fanghonghong theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT gaoqing theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT liujiaonan theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT wulijuan theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT songmanshu theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT wangyouxin theindirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT liudi indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT penghongli indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT sunqi indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT zhaozhongyao indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT yuxinwei indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT gesiqi indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT wanghao indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT fanghonghong indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT gaoqing indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT liujiaonan indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT wulijuan indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT songmanshu indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis AT wangyouxin indirectefficacycomparisonofdnamethylationinsputumforearlyscreeningandauxiliarydetectionoflungcancerametaanalysis |