Cargando…

The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance

Water services providers should supply water that is fit for human consumption, taking into account multi-barrier approaches and technical aspects such as design aspects, operation monitoring, final water quality compliance monitoring, plant monitoring practices, maintenance, and risk management pra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nefale, Avhashoni D., Kamika, Ilunga, Obi, Chikwelu L., Momba, Maggy NB
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28753964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070810
_version_ 1783256277507375104
author Nefale, Avhashoni D.
Kamika, Ilunga
Obi, Chikwelu L.
Momba, Maggy NB
author_facet Nefale, Avhashoni D.
Kamika, Ilunga
Obi, Chikwelu L.
Momba, Maggy NB
author_sort Nefale, Avhashoni D.
collection PubMed
description Water services providers should supply water that is fit for human consumption, taking into account multi-barrier approaches and technical aspects such as design aspects, operation monitoring, final water quality compliance monitoring, plant monitoring practices, maintenance, and risk management practices. Against this background, this study focused on applying the diagnostic tool for technical compliance as well as assessing the compliance of water treatment plants with management norms. Six plants in the Vhembe District Municipality were selected; the Vondo, Malamulele, Mutshedzi, and Mutale plants (conventional), and the Dzingahe and Tshedza package plants. During the first assessment, four (Malamulele, Mutshedzi, Mutale and Dzingahe) plants scored between 44% and 49% and achieved Class 3 certification, revealing serious challenges requiring immediate intervention. Two water plants (Vondo and Tshedza, scoring 53% and 63%, respectively) were in the Class 2 category, revealing serious challenges requiring attention and improvement. During the second assessment, all plants scored between 63% and 87% (Class 2 category). The greatest improvement (30%) was noted for the Dzingahe and Tshedza plants, followed by the Malamulele plant, while the Mutale, Vondo, and Mutshedzi plants improved their scores by 20%, 17% and 14%, respectively. After corrective actions and re-measurement, no plant complied. It is recommended that Water Services Providers (WSPs) regularly apply the diagnostic tools and water safety plans as developed in order to comply with applicable standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5551248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55512482017-08-11 The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance Nefale, Avhashoni D. Kamika, Ilunga Obi, Chikwelu L. Momba, Maggy NB Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Water services providers should supply water that is fit for human consumption, taking into account multi-barrier approaches and technical aspects such as design aspects, operation monitoring, final water quality compliance monitoring, plant monitoring practices, maintenance, and risk management practices. Against this background, this study focused on applying the diagnostic tool for technical compliance as well as assessing the compliance of water treatment plants with management norms. Six plants in the Vhembe District Municipality were selected; the Vondo, Malamulele, Mutshedzi, and Mutale plants (conventional), and the Dzingahe and Tshedza package plants. During the first assessment, four (Malamulele, Mutshedzi, Mutale and Dzingahe) plants scored between 44% and 49% and achieved Class 3 certification, revealing serious challenges requiring immediate intervention. Two water plants (Vondo and Tshedza, scoring 53% and 63%, respectively) were in the Class 2 category, revealing serious challenges requiring attention and improvement. During the second assessment, all plants scored between 63% and 87% (Class 2 category). The greatest improvement (30%) was noted for the Dzingahe and Tshedza plants, followed by the Malamulele plant, while the Mutale, Vondo, and Mutshedzi plants improved their scores by 20%, 17% and 14%, respectively. After corrective actions and re-measurement, no plant complied. It is recommended that Water Services Providers (WSPs) regularly apply the diagnostic tools and water safety plans as developed in order to comply with applicable standards. MDPI 2017-07-19 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5551248/ /pubmed/28753964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070810 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nefale, Avhashoni D.
Kamika, Ilunga
Obi, Chikwelu L.
Momba, Maggy NB
The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance
title The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance
title_full The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance
title_fullStr The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance
title_full_unstemmed The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance
title_short The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance
title_sort limpopo non-metropolitan drinking water supplier response to a diagnostic tool for technical compliance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28753964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070810
work_keys_str_mv AT nefaleavhashonid thelimpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance
AT kamikailunga thelimpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance
AT obichikwelul thelimpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance
AT mombamaggynb thelimpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance
AT nefaleavhashonid limpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance
AT kamikailunga limpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance
AT obichikwelul limpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance
AT mombamaggynb limpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance