Cargando…
The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance
Water services providers should supply water that is fit for human consumption, taking into account multi-barrier approaches and technical aspects such as design aspects, operation monitoring, final water quality compliance monitoring, plant monitoring practices, maintenance, and risk management pra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28753964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070810 |
_version_ | 1783256277507375104 |
---|---|
author | Nefale, Avhashoni D. Kamika, Ilunga Obi, Chikwelu L. Momba, Maggy NB |
author_facet | Nefale, Avhashoni D. Kamika, Ilunga Obi, Chikwelu L. Momba, Maggy NB |
author_sort | Nefale, Avhashoni D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Water services providers should supply water that is fit for human consumption, taking into account multi-barrier approaches and technical aspects such as design aspects, operation monitoring, final water quality compliance monitoring, plant monitoring practices, maintenance, and risk management practices. Against this background, this study focused on applying the diagnostic tool for technical compliance as well as assessing the compliance of water treatment plants with management norms. Six plants in the Vhembe District Municipality were selected; the Vondo, Malamulele, Mutshedzi, and Mutale plants (conventional), and the Dzingahe and Tshedza package plants. During the first assessment, four (Malamulele, Mutshedzi, Mutale and Dzingahe) plants scored between 44% and 49% and achieved Class 3 certification, revealing serious challenges requiring immediate intervention. Two water plants (Vondo and Tshedza, scoring 53% and 63%, respectively) were in the Class 2 category, revealing serious challenges requiring attention and improvement. During the second assessment, all plants scored between 63% and 87% (Class 2 category). The greatest improvement (30%) was noted for the Dzingahe and Tshedza plants, followed by the Malamulele plant, while the Mutale, Vondo, and Mutshedzi plants improved their scores by 20%, 17% and 14%, respectively. After corrective actions and re-measurement, no plant complied. It is recommended that Water Services Providers (WSPs) regularly apply the diagnostic tools and water safety plans as developed in order to comply with applicable standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5551248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55512482017-08-11 The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance Nefale, Avhashoni D. Kamika, Ilunga Obi, Chikwelu L. Momba, Maggy NB Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Water services providers should supply water that is fit for human consumption, taking into account multi-barrier approaches and technical aspects such as design aspects, operation monitoring, final water quality compliance monitoring, plant monitoring practices, maintenance, and risk management practices. Against this background, this study focused on applying the diagnostic tool for technical compliance as well as assessing the compliance of water treatment plants with management norms. Six plants in the Vhembe District Municipality were selected; the Vondo, Malamulele, Mutshedzi, and Mutale plants (conventional), and the Dzingahe and Tshedza package plants. During the first assessment, four (Malamulele, Mutshedzi, Mutale and Dzingahe) plants scored between 44% and 49% and achieved Class 3 certification, revealing serious challenges requiring immediate intervention. Two water plants (Vondo and Tshedza, scoring 53% and 63%, respectively) were in the Class 2 category, revealing serious challenges requiring attention and improvement. During the second assessment, all plants scored between 63% and 87% (Class 2 category). The greatest improvement (30%) was noted for the Dzingahe and Tshedza plants, followed by the Malamulele plant, while the Mutale, Vondo, and Mutshedzi plants improved their scores by 20%, 17% and 14%, respectively. After corrective actions and re-measurement, no plant complied. It is recommended that Water Services Providers (WSPs) regularly apply the diagnostic tools and water safety plans as developed in order to comply with applicable standards. MDPI 2017-07-19 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5551248/ /pubmed/28753964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070810 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nefale, Avhashoni D. Kamika, Ilunga Obi, Chikwelu L. Momba, Maggy NB The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance |
title | The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance |
title_full | The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance |
title_fullStr | The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance |
title_full_unstemmed | The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance |
title_short | The Limpopo Non-Metropolitan Drinking Water Supplier Response to a Diagnostic Tool for Technical Compliance |
title_sort | limpopo non-metropolitan drinking water supplier response to a diagnostic tool for technical compliance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28753964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nefaleavhashonid thelimpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance AT kamikailunga thelimpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance AT obichikwelul thelimpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance AT mombamaggynb thelimpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance AT nefaleavhashonid limpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance AT kamikailunga limpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance AT obichikwelul limpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance AT mombamaggynb limpopononmetropolitandrinkingwatersupplierresponsetoadiagnostictoolfortechnicalcompliance |