Cargando…
Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study
BACKGROUND: For the first time in India, allografts from human extracted teeth were prepared. A randomized, prospective, clinicoradiographical, histological study was conducted to evaluate their efficacy in comparison with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in alveolar ridge preservation. MATERIALS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28839405 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_147_17 |
_version_ | 1783256294115770368 |
---|---|
author | Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep D’Lima, Cynthia Bernardo Samat, Urmila Chandrashekhar Karde, Prerna Ashok Patil, Agraja Ganpat Dani, Nitin Hemchandra |
author_facet | Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep D’Lima, Cynthia Bernardo Samat, Urmila Chandrashekhar Karde, Prerna Ashok Patil, Agraja Ganpat Dani, Nitin Hemchandra |
author_sort | Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For the first time in India, allografts from human extracted teeth were prepared. A randomized, prospective, clinicoradiographical, histological study was conducted to evaluate their efficacy in comparison with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in alveolar ridge preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Graft preparation: with written consent, teeth were collected from three donors (full mouth extraction cases). Once donors’ serums were tested negative for HIV, HBV, HCV, and Venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL), mineralized whole tooth allograft (WTA) and dentin allograft (DA) were prepared using the standard protocol of Tissue Bank at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial, 15 patients undergoing extraction of at least four teeth were selected. In each patient after atraumatic extractions, one socket was grafted with WTA, second with DA, third with FDBA, and fourth was left ungrafted (control site). All the sites were covered with chorion membrane. To estimate three-dimensional alveolar crest changes, cone beam computed tomography scans were taken immediately after grafting and 4 months postoperatively. Bone biopsies using 3 mm trephine bur were obtained from four patients at the time of implant placement and evaluated histologically. RESULTS: Clinically uneventful healing was observed at all sites. Compared to other sites, WTA and DA consistently showed superior results demonstrating least reduction in alveolar crest height and width which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Between WTA and DA sites, there was no statistically significant difference. Histological analysis also confirmed more new bone formation at WTA and DA sites. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than disposing extracted human teeth as a biomedical waste (common practice), they can be collected from suitable systemically healthy donors. With the help of tissue bank, they can be processed into an allograft, serving as an excellent alternative to conventional allografts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5551324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55513242017-08-24 Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep D’Lima, Cynthia Bernardo Samat, Urmila Chandrashekhar Karde, Prerna Ashok Patil, Agraja Ganpat Dani, Nitin Hemchandra Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: For the first time in India, allografts from human extracted teeth were prepared. A randomized, prospective, clinicoradiographical, histological study was conducted to evaluate their efficacy in comparison with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in alveolar ridge preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Graft preparation: with written consent, teeth were collected from three donors (full mouth extraction cases). Once donors’ serums were tested negative for HIV, HBV, HCV, and Venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL), mineralized whole tooth allograft (WTA) and dentin allograft (DA) were prepared using the standard protocol of Tissue Bank at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial, 15 patients undergoing extraction of at least four teeth were selected. In each patient after atraumatic extractions, one socket was grafted with WTA, second with DA, third with FDBA, and fourth was left ungrafted (control site). All the sites were covered with chorion membrane. To estimate three-dimensional alveolar crest changes, cone beam computed tomography scans were taken immediately after grafting and 4 months postoperatively. Bone biopsies using 3 mm trephine bur were obtained from four patients at the time of implant placement and evaluated histologically. RESULTS: Clinically uneventful healing was observed at all sites. Compared to other sites, WTA and DA consistently showed superior results demonstrating least reduction in alveolar crest height and width which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Between WTA and DA sites, there was no statistically significant difference. Histological analysis also confirmed more new bone formation at WTA and DA sites. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than disposing extracted human teeth as a biomedical waste (common practice), they can be collected from suitable systemically healthy donors. With the help of tissue bank, they can be processed into an allograft, serving as an excellent alternative to conventional allografts. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5551324/ /pubmed/28839405 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_147_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep D’Lima, Cynthia Bernardo Samat, Urmila Chandrashekhar Karde, Prerna Ashok Patil, Agraja Ganpat Dani, Nitin Hemchandra Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study |
title | Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study |
title_full | Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study |
title_short | Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study |
title_sort | comparative alveolar ridge preservation using allogenous tooth graft versus free-dried bone allograft: a randomized, controlled, prospective, clinical pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28839405 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_147_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joshichaitanyapradeep comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy AT dlimacynthiabernardo comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy AT samaturmilachandrashekhar comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy AT kardeprernaashok comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy AT patilagrajaganpat comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy AT daninitinhemchandra comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy |