Cargando…

Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: For the first time in India, allografts from human extracted teeth were prepared. A randomized, prospective, clinicoradiographical, histological study was conducted to evaluate their efficacy in comparison with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in alveolar ridge preservation. MATERIALS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep, D’Lima, Cynthia Bernardo, Samat, Urmila Chandrashekhar, Karde, Prerna Ashok, Patil, Agraja Ganpat, Dani, Nitin Hemchandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28839405
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_147_17
_version_ 1783256294115770368
author Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep
D’Lima, Cynthia Bernardo
Samat, Urmila Chandrashekhar
Karde, Prerna Ashok
Patil, Agraja Ganpat
Dani, Nitin Hemchandra
author_facet Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep
D’Lima, Cynthia Bernardo
Samat, Urmila Chandrashekhar
Karde, Prerna Ashok
Patil, Agraja Ganpat
Dani, Nitin Hemchandra
author_sort Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For the first time in India, allografts from human extracted teeth were prepared. A randomized, prospective, clinicoradiographical, histological study was conducted to evaluate their efficacy in comparison with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in alveolar ridge preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Graft preparation: with written consent, teeth were collected from three donors (full mouth extraction cases). Once donors’ serums were tested negative for HIV, HBV, HCV, and Venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL), mineralized whole tooth allograft (WTA) and dentin allograft (DA) were prepared using the standard protocol of Tissue Bank at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial, 15 patients undergoing extraction of at least four teeth were selected. In each patient after atraumatic extractions, one socket was grafted with WTA, second with DA, third with FDBA, and fourth was left ungrafted (control site). All the sites were covered with chorion membrane. To estimate three-dimensional alveolar crest changes, cone beam computed tomography scans were taken immediately after grafting and 4 months postoperatively. Bone biopsies using 3 mm trephine bur were obtained from four patients at the time of implant placement and evaluated histologically. RESULTS: Clinically uneventful healing was observed at all sites. Compared to other sites, WTA and DA consistently showed superior results demonstrating least reduction in alveolar crest height and width which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Between WTA and DA sites, there was no statistically significant difference. Histological analysis also confirmed more new bone formation at WTA and DA sites. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than disposing extracted human teeth as a biomedical waste (common practice), they can be collected from suitable systemically healthy donors. With the help of tissue bank, they can be processed into an allograft, serving as an excellent alternative to conventional allografts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5551324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55513242017-08-24 Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep D’Lima, Cynthia Bernardo Samat, Urmila Chandrashekhar Karde, Prerna Ashok Patil, Agraja Ganpat Dani, Nitin Hemchandra Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: For the first time in India, allografts from human extracted teeth were prepared. A randomized, prospective, clinicoradiographical, histological study was conducted to evaluate their efficacy in comparison with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in alveolar ridge preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Graft preparation: with written consent, teeth were collected from three donors (full mouth extraction cases). Once donors’ serums were tested negative for HIV, HBV, HCV, and Venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL), mineralized whole tooth allograft (WTA) and dentin allograft (DA) were prepared using the standard protocol of Tissue Bank at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial, 15 patients undergoing extraction of at least four teeth were selected. In each patient after atraumatic extractions, one socket was grafted with WTA, second with DA, third with FDBA, and fourth was left ungrafted (control site). All the sites were covered with chorion membrane. To estimate three-dimensional alveolar crest changes, cone beam computed tomography scans were taken immediately after grafting and 4 months postoperatively. Bone biopsies using 3 mm trephine bur were obtained from four patients at the time of implant placement and evaluated histologically. RESULTS: Clinically uneventful healing was observed at all sites. Compared to other sites, WTA and DA consistently showed superior results demonstrating least reduction in alveolar crest height and width which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Between WTA and DA sites, there was no statistically significant difference. Histological analysis also confirmed more new bone formation at WTA and DA sites. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than disposing extracted human teeth as a biomedical waste (common practice), they can be collected from suitable systemically healthy donors. With the help of tissue bank, they can be processed into an allograft, serving as an excellent alternative to conventional allografts. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5551324/ /pubmed/28839405 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_147_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep
D’Lima, Cynthia Bernardo
Samat, Urmila Chandrashekhar
Karde, Prerna Ashok
Patil, Agraja Ganpat
Dani, Nitin Hemchandra
Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study
title Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study
title_full Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study
title_fullStr Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study
title_short Comparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study
title_sort comparative alveolar ridge preservation using allogenous tooth graft versus free-dried bone allograft: a randomized, controlled, prospective, clinical pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28839405
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_147_17
work_keys_str_mv AT joshichaitanyapradeep comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy
AT dlimacynthiabernardo comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy
AT samaturmilachandrashekhar comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy
AT kardeprernaashok comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy
AT patilagrajaganpat comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy
AT daninitinhemchandra comparativealveolarridgepreservationusingallogenoustoothgraftversusfreedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledprospectiveclinicalpilotstudy