Cargando…

Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis

CONTEXT: Marginal discrepancy influenced by the choice of processing material used for the ceramic laminate veneers needs to be explored further for better clinical application. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the amount of cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy associated with different ceram...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranganathan, Hemalatha, Ganapathy, Dhanraj M., Jain, Ashish R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28839415
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_156_17
_version_ 1783256296528543744
author Ranganathan, Hemalatha
Ganapathy, Dhanraj M.
Jain, Ashish R.
author_facet Ranganathan, Hemalatha
Ganapathy, Dhanraj M.
Jain, Ashish R.
author_sort Ranganathan, Hemalatha
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Marginal discrepancy influenced by the choice of processing material used for the ceramic laminate veneers needs to be explored further for better clinical application. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the amount of cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy associated with different ceramic laminate veneering materials. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was an experimental, single-blinded, in vitro trial. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten central incisors were prepared for laminate veneers with 2 mm uniform reduction and heavy chamfer finish line. Ceramic laminate veneers fabricated over the prepared teeth using four different processing materials were categorized into four groups as Group I - aluminous porcelain veneers, Group II - lithium disilicate ceramic veneers, Group III - lithium disilicate-leucite-based veneers, Group IV - zirconia-based ceramic veneers. The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy was measured using a scanning electron microscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: ANOVA and post hoc Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy for four groups was Group I - 114.6 ± 4.3 μm, 132.5 ± 6.5 μm, Group II - 86.1 ± 6.3 μm, 105.4 ± 5.3 μm, Group III - 71.4 ± 4.4 μm, 91.3 ± 4.7 μm, and Group IV - 123.1 ± 4.1 μm, 142.0 ± 5.4 μm. ANOVA and post hoc Tukey HSD tests observed a statistically significant difference between the four test specimens with regard to cervical marginal discrepancy. The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy scored F = 243.408, P < 0.001 and F = 180.844, P < 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study concluded veneers fabricated using leucite reinforced lithium disilicate exhibited the least marginal discrepancy followed by lithium disilicate ceramic, aluminous porcelain, and zirconia-based ceramics. The marginal discrepancy was more in the incisal region than in the cervical region in all the groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5551334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55513342017-08-24 Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis Ranganathan, Hemalatha Ganapathy, Dhanraj M. Jain, Ashish R. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article CONTEXT: Marginal discrepancy influenced by the choice of processing material used for the ceramic laminate veneers needs to be explored further for better clinical application. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the amount of cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy associated with different ceramic laminate veneering materials. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was an experimental, single-blinded, in vitro trial. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten central incisors were prepared for laminate veneers with 2 mm uniform reduction and heavy chamfer finish line. Ceramic laminate veneers fabricated over the prepared teeth using four different processing materials were categorized into four groups as Group I - aluminous porcelain veneers, Group II - lithium disilicate ceramic veneers, Group III - lithium disilicate-leucite-based veneers, Group IV - zirconia-based ceramic veneers. The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy was measured using a scanning electron microscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: ANOVA and post hoc Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy for four groups was Group I - 114.6 ± 4.3 μm, 132.5 ± 6.5 μm, Group II - 86.1 ± 6.3 μm, 105.4 ± 5.3 μm, Group III - 71.4 ± 4.4 μm, 91.3 ± 4.7 μm, and Group IV - 123.1 ± 4.1 μm, 142.0 ± 5.4 μm. ANOVA and post hoc Tukey HSD tests observed a statistically significant difference between the four test specimens with regard to cervical marginal discrepancy. The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy scored F = 243.408, P < 0.001 and F = 180.844, P < 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study concluded veneers fabricated using leucite reinforced lithium disilicate exhibited the least marginal discrepancy followed by lithium disilicate ceramic, aluminous porcelain, and zirconia-based ceramics. The marginal discrepancy was more in the incisal region than in the cervical region in all the groups. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5551334/ /pubmed/28839415 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_156_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ranganathan, Hemalatha
Ganapathy, Dhanraj M.
Jain, Ashish R.
Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis
title Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis
title_full Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis
title_fullStr Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis
title_short Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis
title_sort cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy in ceramic laminate veneering materials: a sem analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28839415
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_156_17
work_keys_str_mv AT ranganathanhemalatha cervicalandincisalmarginaldiscrepancyinceramiclaminateveneeringmaterialsasemanalysis
AT ganapathydhanrajm cervicalandincisalmarginaldiscrepancyinceramiclaminateveneeringmaterialsasemanalysis
AT jainashishr cervicalandincisalmarginaldiscrepancyinceramiclaminateveneeringmaterialsasemanalysis