Cargando…

A Fatigue Life Prediction Method Based on Strain Intensity Factor

In this paper, a strain-intensity-factor-based method is proposed to calculate the fatigue crack growth under the fully reversed loading condition. A theoretical analysis is conducted in detail to demonstrate that the strain intensity factor is likely to be a better driving parameter correlated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wei, Liu, Huili, Wang, Qiang, He, Jingjing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28773049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10070689
_version_ 1783256341361459200
author Zhang, Wei
Liu, Huili
Wang, Qiang
He, Jingjing
author_facet Zhang, Wei
Liu, Huili
Wang, Qiang
He, Jingjing
author_sort Zhang, Wei
collection PubMed
description In this paper, a strain-intensity-factor-based method is proposed to calculate the fatigue crack growth under the fully reversed loading condition. A theoretical analysis is conducted in detail to demonstrate that the strain intensity factor is likely to be a better driving parameter correlated with the fatigue crack growth rate than the stress intensity factor (SIF), especially for some metallic materials (such as 316 austenitic stainless steel) in the low cycle fatigue region with negative stress ratios R (typically R = −1). For fully reversed cyclic loading, the constitutive relation between stress and strain should follow the cyclic stress-strain curve rather than the monotonic one (it is a nonlinear function even within the elastic region). Based on that, a transformation algorithm between the SIF and the strain intensity factor is developed, and the fatigue crack growth rate testing data of 316 austenitic stainless steel and AZ31 magnesium alloy are employed to validate the proposed model. It is clearly observed that the scatter band width of crack growth rate vs. strain intensity factor is narrower than that vs. the SIF for different load ranges (which indicates that the strain intensity factor is a better parameter than the stress intensity factor under the fully reversed load condition). It is also shown that the crack growth rate is not uniquely determined by the SIF range even under the same R, but is also influenced by the maximum loading. Additionally, the fatigue life data (strain-life curve) of smooth cylindrical specimens are also used for further comparison, where a modified Paris equation and the equivalent initial flaw size (EIFS) are involved. The results of the proposed method have a better agreement with the experimental data compared to the stress intensity factor based method. Overall, the strain intensity factor method shows a fairly good ability in calculating the fatigue crack propagation, especially for the fully reversed cyclic loading condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5551732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55517322017-08-11 A Fatigue Life Prediction Method Based on Strain Intensity Factor Zhang, Wei Liu, Huili Wang, Qiang He, Jingjing Materials (Basel) Article In this paper, a strain-intensity-factor-based method is proposed to calculate the fatigue crack growth under the fully reversed loading condition. A theoretical analysis is conducted in detail to demonstrate that the strain intensity factor is likely to be a better driving parameter correlated with the fatigue crack growth rate than the stress intensity factor (SIF), especially for some metallic materials (such as 316 austenitic stainless steel) in the low cycle fatigue region with negative stress ratios R (typically R = −1). For fully reversed cyclic loading, the constitutive relation between stress and strain should follow the cyclic stress-strain curve rather than the monotonic one (it is a nonlinear function even within the elastic region). Based on that, a transformation algorithm between the SIF and the strain intensity factor is developed, and the fatigue crack growth rate testing data of 316 austenitic stainless steel and AZ31 magnesium alloy are employed to validate the proposed model. It is clearly observed that the scatter band width of crack growth rate vs. strain intensity factor is narrower than that vs. the SIF for different load ranges (which indicates that the strain intensity factor is a better parameter than the stress intensity factor under the fully reversed load condition). It is also shown that the crack growth rate is not uniquely determined by the SIF range even under the same R, but is also influenced by the maximum loading. Additionally, the fatigue life data (strain-life curve) of smooth cylindrical specimens are also used for further comparison, where a modified Paris equation and the equivalent initial flaw size (EIFS) are involved. The results of the proposed method have a better agreement with the experimental data compared to the stress intensity factor based method. Overall, the strain intensity factor method shows a fairly good ability in calculating the fatigue crack propagation, especially for the fully reversed cyclic loading condition. MDPI 2017-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5551732/ /pubmed/28773049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10070689 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Wei
Liu, Huili
Wang, Qiang
He, Jingjing
A Fatigue Life Prediction Method Based on Strain Intensity Factor
title A Fatigue Life Prediction Method Based on Strain Intensity Factor
title_full A Fatigue Life Prediction Method Based on Strain Intensity Factor
title_fullStr A Fatigue Life Prediction Method Based on Strain Intensity Factor
title_full_unstemmed A Fatigue Life Prediction Method Based on Strain Intensity Factor
title_short A Fatigue Life Prediction Method Based on Strain Intensity Factor
title_sort fatigue life prediction method based on strain intensity factor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28773049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10070689
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwei afatiguelifepredictionmethodbasedonstrainintensityfactor
AT liuhuili afatiguelifepredictionmethodbasedonstrainintensityfactor
AT wangqiang afatiguelifepredictionmethodbasedonstrainintensityfactor
AT hejingjing afatiguelifepredictionmethodbasedonstrainintensityfactor
AT zhangwei fatiguelifepredictionmethodbasedonstrainintensityfactor
AT liuhuili fatiguelifepredictionmethodbasedonstrainintensityfactor
AT wangqiang fatiguelifepredictionmethodbasedonstrainintensityfactor
AT hejingjing fatiguelifepredictionmethodbasedonstrainintensityfactor