Cargando…

The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?

Clearing wild forests to grow food, fibre, and fuel products can deliver large financial gains. However, the benefits that people obtain from forests—known as ecosystem services—are rarely considered in economic calculations, partly because there are few markets onto which they can be traded. In som...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tanentzap, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5552334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28759563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003292
_version_ 1783256457297264640
author Tanentzap, Andrew J.
author_facet Tanentzap, Andrew J.
author_sort Tanentzap, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description Clearing wild forests to grow food, fibre, and fuel products can deliver large financial gains. However, the benefits that people obtain from forests—known as ecosystem services—are rarely considered in economic calculations, partly because there are few markets onto which they can be traded. In some regions, the benefits delivered by nature might be more economically valuable. A new study maps where it is profitable to replace tropical forests with cropland and how this might change under future agricultural production and carbon prices. The findings address a major applied challenge by helping to identify sites where forest conservation can be economically viable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5552334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55523342017-08-25 The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”? Tanentzap, Andrew J. PLoS Biol Primer Clearing wild forests to grow food, fibre, and fuel products can deliver large financial gains. However, the benefits that people obtain from forests—known as ecosystem services—are rarely considered in economic calculations, partly because there are few markets onto which they can be traded. In some regions, the benefits delivered by nature might be more economically valuable. A new study maps where it is profitable to replace tropical forests with cropland and how this might change under future agricultural production and carbon prices. The findings address a major applied challenge by helping to identify sites where forest conservation can be economically viable. Public Library of Science 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5552334/ /pubmed/28759563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003292 Text en © 2017 Andrew J. Tanentzap http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Primer
Tanentzap, Andrew J.
The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?
title The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?
title_full The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?
title_fullStr The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?
title_full_unstemmed The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?
title_short The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?
title_sort costs of saving nature: does it make “cents”?
topic Primer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5552334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28759563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003292
work_keys_str_mv AT tanentzapandrewj thecostsofsavingnaturedoesitmakecents
AT tanentzapandrewj costsofsavingnaturedoesitmakecents