Cargando…

Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning

Rapid learning can be critical to ensure elite performance in a changing world or to recover basic movement after neural injuries. Recently it was shown that the variability of follow-through movements affects the rate of motor memory formation. Here we investigate if lead-in movement has a similar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Ian S., Ford, Christopher, Cangelosi, Angelo, Franklin, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5552870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28798355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05697-z
_version_ 1783256538327023616
author Howard, Ian S.
Ford, Christopher
Cangelosi, Angelo
Franklin, David W.
author_facet Howard, Ian S.
Ford, Christopher
Cangelosi, Angelo
Franklin, David W.
author_sort Howard, Ian S.
collection PubMed
description Rapid learning can be critical to ensure elite performance in a changing world or to recover basic movement after neural injuries. Recently it was shown that the variability of follow-through movements affects the rate of motor memory formation. Here we investigate if lead-in movement has a similar effect on learning rate. We hypothesized that both modality and variability of lead-in movement would play critical roles, with simulations suggesting that only changes in active lead-in variability would exhibit slower learning. We tested this experimentally using a two-movement paradigm, with either visual or active initial lead-in movements preceeding a second movement performed in a force field. As predicted, increasing active lead-in variability reduced the rate of motor adaptation, whereas changes in visual lead-in variability had little effect. This demonstrates that distinct neural tuning activity is induced by different lead-in modalities, subsequently influencing the access to, and switching between, distinct motor memories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5552870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55528702017-08-14 Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning Howard, Ian S. Ford, Christopher Cangelosi, Angelo Franklin, David W. Sci Rep Article Rapid learning can be critical to ensure elite performance in a changing world or to recover basic movement after neural injuries. Recently it was shown that the variability of follow-through movements affects the rate of motor memory formation. Here we investigate if lead-in movement has a similar effect on learning rate. We hypothesized that both modality and variability of lead-in movement would play critical roles, with simulations suggesting that only changes in active lead-in variability would exhibit slower learning. We tested this experimentally using a two-movement paradigm, with either visual or active initial lead-in movements preceeding a second movement performed in a force field. As predicted, increasing active lead-in variability reduced the rate of motor adaptation, whereas changes in visual lead-in variability had little effect. This demonstrates that distinct neural tuning activity is induced by different lead-in modalities, subsequently influencing the access to, and switching between, distinct motor memories. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5552870/ /pubmed/28798355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05697-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Howard, Ian S.
Ford, Christopher
Cangelosi, Angelo
Franklin, David W.
Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_full Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_fullStr Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_full_unstemmed Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_short Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_sort active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5552870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28798355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05697-z
work_keys_str_mv AT howardians activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning
AT fordchristopher activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning
AT cangelosiangelo activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning
AT franklindavidw activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning