Cargando…

Mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis

In many gram positive bacteria, horizontal transfer and virulence are regulated by peptide‐mediated cell‐cell signaling. The heptapeptide cCF10 (C) activates conjugative transfer of the Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pCF10, whereas the iCF10 (I) peptide inhibits transfer. Both peptides bind to the sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yuqing, Bandyopadhyay, Arpan, Kozlowicz, Briana K., Haemig, Heather A. H., Tai, Albert, Hu, Wei‐Shou, Dunny, Gary M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5552905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.492
_version_ 1783256543706218496
author Chen, Yuqing
Bandyopadhyay, Arpan
Kozlowicz, Briana K.
Haemig, Heather A. H.
Tai, Albert
Hu, Wei‐Shou
Dunny, Gary M.
author_facet Chen, Yuqing
Bandyopadhyay, Arpan
Kozlowicz, Briana K.
Haemig, Heather A. H.
Tai, Albert
Hu, Wei‐Shou
Dunny, Gary M.
author_sort Chen, Yuqing
collection PubMed
description In many gram positive bacteria, horizontal transfer and virulence are regulated by peptide‐mediated cell‐cell signaling. The heptapeptide cCF10 (C) activates conjugative transfer of the Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pCF10, whereas the iCF10 (I) peptide inhibits transfer. Both peptides bind to the same domain of the master transcription regulator PrgX, a repressor of transcription of the prgQ operon encoding conjugation genes. We show that repression of prgQ by PrgX tetramers requires formation of a pCF10 DNA loop where each of two PrgX DNA‐binding sites is occupied by a dimer. I binding to PrgX enhances prgQ repression, while C binding has the opposite effect. Previous models suggested that differential effects of these two peptides on the PrgX oligomerization state accounted for their distinct functions. Our new results demonstrate that both peptides have similar, high‐binding affinity for PrgX, and that both peptides actually promote formation of PrgX tetramers with higher DNA‐binding affinity than Apo‐PrgX. We propose that differences in repression ability of PrgX/peptide complexes result from subtle differences in the structures of DNA‐bound PrgX/peptide complexes. Changes in the induction state of a donor cell likely results from replacement of one type of DNA‐bound peptide/PrgX tetramer with the other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5552905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55529052017-08-15 Mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis Chen, Yuqing Bandyopadhyay, Arpan Kozlowicz, Briana K. Haemig, Heather A. H. Tai, Albert Hu, Wei‐Shou Dunny, Gary M. Microbiologyopen Original Research In many gram positive bacteria, horizontal transfer and virulence are regulated by peptide‐mediated cell‐cell signaling. The heptapeptide cCF10 (C) activates conjugative transfer of the Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pCF10, whereas the iCF10 (I) peptide inhibits transfer. Both peptides bind to the same domain of the master transcription regulator PrgX, a repressor of transcription of the prgQ operon encoding conjugation genes. We show that repression of prgQ by PrgX tetramers requires formation of a pCF10 DNA loop where each of two PrgX DNA‐binding sites is occupied by a dimer. I binding to PrgX enhances prgQ repression, while C binding has the opposite effect. Previous models suggested that differential effects of these two peptides on the PrgX oligomerization state accounted for their distinct functions. Our new results demonstrate that both peptides have similar, high‐binding affinity for PrgX, and that both peptides actually promote formation of PrgX tetramers with higher DNA‐binding affinity than Apo‐PrgX. We propose that differences in repression ability of PrgX/peptide complexes result from subtle differences in the structures of DNA‐bound PrgX/peptide complexes. Changes in the induction state of a donor cell likely results from replacement of one type of DNA‐bound peptide/PrgX tetramer with the other. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5552905/ /pubmed/28523739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.492 Text en © 2017 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chen, Yuqing
Bandyopadhyay, Arpan
Kozlowicz, Briana K.
Haemig, Heather A. H.
Tai, Albert
Hu, Wei‐Shou
Dunny, Gary M.
Mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis
title Mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis
title_full Mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis
title_fullStr Mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis
title_short Mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis
title_sort mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in enterococcus faecalis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5552905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.492
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyuqing mechanismsofpeptidesexpheromoneregulationofconjugationinenterococcusfaecalis
AT bandyopadhyayarpan mechanismsofpeptidesexpheromoneregulationofconjugationinenterococcusfaecalis
AT kozlowiczbrianak mechanismsofpeptidesexpheromoneregulationofconjugationinenterococcusfaecalis
AT haemigheatherah mechanismsofpeptidesexpheromoneregulationofconjugationinenterococcusfaecalis
AT taialbert mechanismsofpeptidesexpheromoneregulationofconjugationinenterococcusfaecalis
AT huweishou mechanismsofpeptidesexpheromoneregulationofconjugationinenterococcusfaecalis
AT dunnygarym mechanismsofpeptidesexpheromoneregulationofconjugationinenterococcusfaecalis