Cargando…

Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Previous prevention programs in the school context have not addressed both genders, have been time-consuming, or have had deficits in the evaluation method. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a universal prevention program for female and male adolescents on eating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gumz, Antje, Weigel, Angelika, Daubmann, Anne, Wegscheider, Karl, Romer, Georg, Löwe, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5553667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28800753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1454-4
_version_ 1783256655033532416
author Gumz, Antje
Weigel, Angelika
Daubmann, Anne
Wegscheider, Karl
Romer, Georg
Löwe, Bernd
author_facet Gumz, Antje
Weigel, Angelika
Daubmann, Anne
Wegscheider, Karl
Romer, Georg
Löwe, Bernd
author_sort Gumz, Antje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous prevention programs in the school context have not addressed both genders, have been time-consuming, or have had deficits in the evaluation method. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a universal prevention program for female and male adolescents on eating disorder pathology and related risk factors. METHODS: Between February 2012 and July 2014, 2515 students in 23 schools from 8th or 11th grade were assessed for eligibility in this longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled trial with a six months follow-up. Of those students, 2342 were cluster-randomized to the intervention condition which received a six school hours universal prevention program or to the no treatment control condition. RESULTS: The complete case population comprised 724 students in the intervention (54.3% female, M = 14.3 years, SD = 1.61) and 728 in the control condition (57.0% female, M = 14.7 years, SD = 1.63). Random-effects analysis of covariance on the primary outcome showed no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in their eating disorder pathology change scores six months after the intervention. Regarding secondary outcomes, participants in the intervention group showed a greater increase in knowledge about eating disorders both after the intervention (p < .001, ES = 1.06) and six months later (p = .01, ES = 0.40). Greater reductions in anxiety severity were observed in the intervention group post-intervention (p = .02, ES = 0.22) which was not maintained at the six months follow-up. Results differed between participants from grade 8 and 11. CONCLUSION: The present universal prevention program can be particularly recommended for adolescents from grade 11. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 97989348 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1454-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5553667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55536672017-08-15 Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial Gumz, Antje Weigel, Angelika Daubmann, Anne Wegscheider, Karl Romer, Georg Löwe, Bernd BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous prevention programs in the school context have not addressed both genders, have been time-consuming, or have had deficits in the evaluation method. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a universal prevention program for female and male adolescents on eating disorder pathology and related risk factors. METHODS: Between February 2012 and July 2014, 2515 students in 23 schools from 8th or 11th grade were assessed for eligibility in this longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled trial with a six months follow-up. Of those students, 2342 were cluster-randomized to the intervention condition which received a six school hours universal prevention program or to the no treatment control condition. RESULTS: The complete case population comprised 724 students in the intervention (54.3% female, M = 14.3 years, SD = 1.61) and 728 in the control condition (57.0% female, M = 14.7 years, SD = 1.63). Random-effects analysis of covariance on the primary outcome showed no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in their eating disorder pathology change scores six months after the intervention. Regarding secondary outcomes, participants in the intervention group showed a greater increase in knowledge about eating disorders both after the intervention (p < .001, ES = 1.06) and six months later (p = .01, ES = 0.40). Greater reductions in anxiety severity were observed in the intervention group post-intervention (p = .02, ES = 0.22) which was not maintained at the six months follow-up. Results differed between participants from grade 8 and 11. CONCLUSION: The present universal prevention program can be particularly recommended for adolescents from grade 11. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 97989348 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1454-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5553667/ /pubmed/28800753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1454-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gumz, Antje
Weigel, Angelika
Daubmann, Anne
Wegscheider, Karl
Romer, Georg
Löwe, Bernd
Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5553667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28800753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1454-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gumzantje efficacyofapreventionprogramforeatingdisordersinschoolsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weigelangelika efficacyofapreventionprogramforeatingdisordersinschoolsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT daubmannanne efficacyofapreventionprogramforeatingdisordersinschoolsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wegscheiderkarl efficacyofapreventionprogramforeatingdisordersinschoolsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT romergeorg efficacyofapreventionprogramforeatingdisordersinschoolsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lowebernd efficacyofapreventionprogramforeatingdisordersinschoolsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial