Cargando…
Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care
BACKGROUND: Hotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRAS are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Specific inhibitors of BRAF and MEK have shown significant survival benefits in large phase III trials. However, the prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations outside...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5553744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28797232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5 |
_version_ | 1783256666288947200 |
---|---|
author | Heppt, Markus V. Siepmann, Timo Engel, Jutta Schubert-Fritschle, Gabriele Eckel, Renate Mirlach, Laura Kirchner, Thomas Jung, Andreas Gesierich, Anja Ruzicka, Thomas Flaig, Michael J. Berking, Carola |
author_facet | Heppt, Markus V. Siepmann, Timo Engel, Jutta Schubert-Fritschle, Gabriele Eckel, Renate Mirlach, Laura Kirchner, Thomas Jung, Andreas Gesierich, Anja Ruzicka, Thomas Flaig, Michael J. Berking, Carola |
author_sort | Heppt, Markus V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRAS are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Specific inhibitors of BRAF and MEK have shown significant survival benefits in large phase III trials. However, the prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations outside of clinical trials remains unclear. METHODS: The mutational status of BRAF (exon 15) and NRAS (exon 2 and 3) was determined in melanoma samples of 217 patients with pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing. The genotypes were correlated with clinical outcomes and pathologic features of the primary tumors. Time to disease progression was calculated with the cumulative incidence function. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Relative survival was calculated with the Ederer-II method. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) was allowed. RESULTS: Mutations in BRAF and NRAS were identified in 40.1 and 24.4% of cases, respectively. Concurrent mutations in both genes were detected in further 2.3%. The remaining 33.2% were wild type for the investigated exons (WT). BRAF mutations were significantly associated with younger age at first diagnosis (p < 0.001) and truncal localization of the culprit primary (p = 0.002). The nodular subtype was most common in the NRAS cohort. In addition, NRAS-mutant melanoma patients showed a higher frequency of nodal relapse (p = 0.013) and development of metastatic disease (p = 0.021). The time to loco-regional nodal relapse was shortest in NRAS-mutant melanoma (p = 0.002). Presence of NRAS mutation was an independent risk factor for disease progression in multivariate analysis (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.02 – 3.98). BRAF-mutant melanoma patients showed a tendency for better overall and relative survival. Genotype was not a consistent risk factor in multivariate analysis. Instead, positive sentinel lymph node status (HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.15 – 6.10) and treatment with ICB in stage IV disease (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.48) were significant multivariate risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: NRAS-mutant tumors tended to behave more aggressively particularly in early stages of the disease in this high-risk melanoma population. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade improved survival in stage IV disease in a real-world setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5553744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55537442017-08-15 Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care Heppt, Markus V. Siepmann, Timo Engel, Jutta Schubert-Fritschle, Gabriele Eckel, Renate Mirlach, Laura Kirchner, Thomas Jung, Andreas Gesierich, Anja Ruzicka, Thomas Flaig, Michael J. Berking, Carola BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Hotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRAS are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Specific inhibitors of BRAF and MEK have shown significant survival benefits in large phase III trials. However, the prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations outside of clinical trials remains unclear. METHODS: The mutational status of BRAF (exon 15) and NRAS (exon 2 and 3) was determined in melanoma samples of 217 patients with pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing. The genotypes were correlated with clinical outcomes and pathologic features of the primary tumors. Time to disease progression was calculated with the cumulative incidence function. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Relative survival was calculated with the Ederer-II method. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) was allowed. RESULTS: Mutations in BRAF and NRAS were identified in 40.1 and 24.4% of cases, respectively. Concurrent mutations in both genes were detected in further 2.3%. The remaining 33.2% were wild type for the investigated exons (WT). BRAF mutations were significantly associated with younger age at first diagnosis (p < 0.001) and truncal localization of the culprit primary (p = 0.002). The nodular subtype was most common in the NRAS cohort. In addition, NRAS-mutant melanoma patients showed a higher frequency of nodal relapse (p = 0.013) and development of metastatic disease (p = 0.021). The time to loco-regional nodal relapse was shortest in NRAS-mutant melanoma (p = 0.002). Presence of NRAS mutation was an independent risk factor for disease progression in multivariate analysis (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.02 – 3.98). BRAF-mutant melanoma patients showed a tendency for better overall and relative survival. Genotype was not a consistent risk factor in multivariate analysis. Instead, positive sentinel lymph node status (HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.15 – 6.10) and treatment with ICB in stage IV disease (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.48) were significant multivariate risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: NRAS-mutant tumors tended to behave more aggressively particularly in early stages of the disease in this high-risk melanoma population. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade improved survival in stage IV disease in a real-world setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5553744/ /pubmed/28797232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Heppt, Markus V. Siepmann, Timo Engel, Jutta Schubert-Fritschle, Gabriele Eckel, Renate Mirlach, Laura Kirchner, Thomas Jung, Andreas Gesierich, Anja Ruzicka, Thomas Flaig, Michael J. Berking, Carola Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care |
title | Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care |
title_full | Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care |
title_fullStr | Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care |
title_short | Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care |
title_sort | prognostic significance of braf and nras mutations in melanoma: a german study from routine care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5553744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28797232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hepptmarkusv prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT siepmanntimo prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT engeljutta prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT schubertfritschlegabriele prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT eckelrenate prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT mirlachlaura prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT kirchnerthomas prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT jungandreas prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT gesierichanja prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT ruzickathomas prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT flaigmichaelj prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare AT berkingcarola prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare |