Cargando…

Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care

BACKGROUND: Hotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRAS are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Specific inhibitors of BRAF and MEK have shown significant survival benefits in large phase III trials. However, the prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations outside...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heppt, Markus V., Siepmann, Timo, Engel, Jutta, Schubert-Fritschle, Gabriele, Eckel, Renate, Mirlach, Laura, Kirchner, Thomas, Jung, Andreas, Gesierich, Anja, Ruzicka, Thomas, Flaig, Michael J., Berking, Carola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5553744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28797232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5
_version_ 1783256666288947200
author Heppt, Markus V.
Siepmann, Timo
Engel, Jutta
Schubert-Fritschle, Gabriele
Eckel, Renate
Mirlach, Laura
Kirchner, Thomas
Jung, Andreas
Gesierich, Anja
Ruzicka, Thomas
Flaig, Michael J.
Berking, Carola
author_facet Heppt, Markus V.
Siepmann, Timo
Engel, Jutta
Schubert-Fritschle, Gabriele
Eckel, Renate
Mirlach, Laura
Kirchner, Thomas
Jung, Andreas
Gesierich, Anja
Ruzicka, Thomas
Flaig, Michael J.
Berking, Carola
author_sort Heppt, Markus V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRAS are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Specific inhibitors of BRAF and MEK have shown significant survival benefits in large phase III trials. However, the prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations outside of clinical trials remains unclear. METHODS: The mutational status of BRAF (exon 15) and NRAS (exon 2 and 3) was determined in melanoma samples of 217 patients with pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing. The genotypes were correlated with clinical outcomes and pathologic features of the primary tumors. Time to disease progression was calculated with the cumulative incidence function. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Relative survival was calculated with the Ederer-II method. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) was allowed. RESULTS: Mutations in BRAF and NRAS were identified in 40.1 and 24.4% of cases, respectively. Concurrent mutations in both genes were detected in further 2.3%. The remaining 33.2% were wild type for the investigated exons (WT). BRAF mutations were significantly associated with younger age at first diagnosis (p < 0.001) and truncal localization of the culprit primary (p = 0.002). The nodular subtype was most common in the NRAS cohort. In addition, NRAS-mutant melanoma patients showed a higher frequency of nodal relapse (p = 0.013) and development of metastatic disease (p = 0.021). The time to loco-regional nodal relapse was shortest in NRAS-mutant melanoma (p = 0.002). Presence of NRAS mutation was an independent risk factor for disease progression in multivariate analysis (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.02 – 3.98). BRAF-mutant melanoma patients showed a tendency for better overall and relative survival. Genotype was not a consistent risk factor in multivariate analysis. Instead, positive sentinel lymph node status (HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.15 – 6.10) and treatment with ICB in stage IV disease (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.48) were significant multivariate risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: NRAS-mutant tumors tended to behave more aggressively particularly in early stages of the disease in this high-risk melanoma population. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade improved survival in stage IV disease in a real-world setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5553744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55537442017-08-15 Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care Heppt, Markus V. Siepmann, Timo Engel, Jutta Schubert-Fritschle, Gabriele Eckel, Renate Mirlach, Laura Kirchner, Thomas Jung, Andreas Gesierich, Anja Ruzicka, Thomas Flaig, Michael J. Berking, Carola BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Hotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRAS are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Specific inhibitors of BRAF and MEK have shown significant survival benefits in large phase III trials. However, the prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations outside of clinical trials remains unclear. METHODS: The mutational status of BRAF (exon 15) and NRAS (exon 2 and 3) was determined in melanoma samples of 217 patients with pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing. The genotypes were correlated with clinical outcomes and pathologic features of the primary tumors. Time to disease progression was calculated with the cumulative incidence function. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Relative survival was calculated with the Ederer-II method. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) was allowed. RESULTS: Mutations in BRAF and NRAS were identified in 40.1 and 24.4% of cases, respectively. Concurrent mutations in both genes were detected in further 2.3%. The remaining 33.2% were wild type for the investigated exons (WT). BRAF mutations were significantly associated with younger age at first diagnosis (p < 0.001) and truncal localization of the culprit primary (p = 0.002). The nodular subtype was most common in the NRAS cohort. In addition, NRAS-mutant melanoma patients showed a higher frequency of nodal relapse (p = 0.013) and development of metastatic disease (p = 0.021). The time to loco-regional nodal relapse was shortest in NRAS-mutant melanoma (p = 0.002). Presence of NRAS mutation was an independent risk factor for disease progression in multivariate analysis (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.02 – 3.98). BRAF-mutant melanoma patients showed a tendency for better overall and relative survival. Genotype was not a consistent risk factor in multivariate analysis. Instead, positive sentinel lymph node status (HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.15 – 6.10) and treatment with ICB in stage IV disease (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.48) were significant multivariate risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: NRAS-mutant tumors tended to behave more aggressively particularly in early stages of the disease in this high-risk melanoma population. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade improved survival in stage IV disease in a real-world setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5553744/ /pubmed/28797232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heppt, Markus V.
Siepmann, Timo
Engel, Jutta
Schubert-Fritschle, Gabriele
Eckel, Renate
Mirlach, Laura
Kirchner, Thomas
Jung, Andreas
Gesierich, Anja
Ruzicka, Thomas
Flaig, Michael J.
Berking, Carola
Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care
title Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care
title_full Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care
title_fullStr Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care
title_short Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care
title_sort prognostic significance of braf and nras mutations in melanoma: a german study from routine care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5553744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28797232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hepptmarkusv prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT siepmanntimo prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT engeljutta prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT schubertfritschlegabriele prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT eckelrenate prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT mirlachlaura prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT kirchnerthomas prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT jungandreas prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT gesierichanja prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT ruzickathomas prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT flaigmichaelj prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare
AT berkingcarola prognosticsignificanceofbrafandnrasmutationsinmelanomaagermanstudyfromroutinecare