Cargando…

Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND: It is skeptical about cardioprotective property of sevoflurane in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, especially in the elderly patients with coronary heart disease. We hypothesized that long duration of sevoflurane inhalation in noncardiac surgery could ameliorate myocardial damage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yunlong, Lin, Wendong, Shen, Sheliang, Wang, Hongfa, Feng, Xiaona, Sun, Jiehao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5553920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28800722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0397-0
_version_ 1783256697635078144
author Zhang, Yunlong
Lin, Wendong
Shen, Sheliang
Wang, Hongfa
Feng, Xiaona
Sun, Jiehao
author_facet Zhang, Yunlong
Lin, Wendong
Shen, Sheliang
Wang, Hongfa
Feng, Xiaona
Sun, Jiehao
author_sort Zhang, Yunlong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is skeptical about cardioprotective property of sevoflurane in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, especially in the elderly patients with coronary heart disease. We hypothesized that long duration of sevoflurane inhalation in noncardiac surgery could ameliorate myocardial damage in such patients. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective study. One hundred twenty-one elderly patients with coronary heart disease were randomly allocated into two groups. Maintenance of anesthesia was achieved by sevoflurane inhalation (Group S) or propofol-remifentanil respectively (Group PR). Serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured before anesthesia induction (T0), 8 h (T1) and 24 h (T2) after anesthesia respectively. The perioperative cardiac output, complications and postoperative 3-month follow-up from end of surgery were recorded. RESULTS: Between the two groups, there were no statistical differences in the values of cTnI and BNP during the study. However, The area under the curve of cTnI values over 24 h after operation was less in Group S. Group PR had lower cardiac output and consumed more amount of phenylephrine during the study (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the group PR, sevoflurane had no benefit in the myocardial protection for the elderly patients with CHD. However, Sevoflurane showed advantage in maintaining hemodynamic stability during the operative period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IPR-16008871, 21 July 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5553920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55539202017-08-15 Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease Zhang, Yunlong Lin, Wendong Shen, Sheliang Wang, Hongfa Feng, Xiaona Sun, Jiehao BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: It is skeptical about cardioprotective property of sevoflurane in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, especially in the elderly patients with coronary heart disease. We hypothesized that long duration of sevoflurane inhalation in noncardiac surgery could ameliorate myocardial damage in such patients. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective study. One hundred twenty-one elderly patients with coronary heart disease were randomly allocated into two groups. Maintenance of anesthesia was achieved by sevoflurane inhalation (Group S) or propofol-remifentanil respectively (Group PR). Serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured before anesthesia induction (T0), 8 h (T1) and 24 h (T2) after anesthesia respectively. The perioperative cardiac output, complications and postoperative 3-month follow-up from end of surgery were recorded. RESULTS: Between the two groups, there were no statistical differences in the values of cTnI and BNP during the study. However, The area under the curve of cTnI values over 24 h after operation was less in Group S. Group PR had lower cardiac output and consumed more amount of phenylephrine during the study (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the group PR, sevoflurane had no benefit in the myocardial protection for the elderly patients with CHD. However, Sevoflurane showed advantage in maintaining hemodynamic stability during the operative period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IPR-16008871, 21 July 2016. BioMed Central 2017-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5553920/ /pubmed/28800722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0397-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yunlong
Lin, Wendong
Shen, Sheliang
Wang, Hongfa
Feng, Xiaona
Sun, Jiehao
Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
title Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
title_full Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
title_fullStr Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
title_full_unstemmed Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
title_short Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
title_sort randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5553920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28800722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0397-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyunlong randomizedcomparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolremifentanilonthecardioprotectiveeffectsinelderlypatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT linwendong randomizedcomparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolremifentanilonthecardioprotectiveeffectsinelderlypatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT shensheliang randomizedcomparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolremifentanilonthecardioprotectiveeffectsinelderlypatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT wanghongfa randomizedcomparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolremifentanilonthecardioprotectiveeffectsinelderlypatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT fengxiaona randomizedcomparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolremifentanilonthecardioprotectiveeffectsinelderlypatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT sunjiehao randomizedcomparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolremifentanilonthecardioprotectiveeffectsinelderlypatientswithcoronaryheartdisease