Cargando…

Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat, and antimicrobial usage and AMR in animal production is one of its contributing sources. Poultry is one of the most widespread types of meat consumed worldwide. Poultry flocks are often raised under intensive conditions using large amounts of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nhung, Nguyen Thi, Chansiripornchai, Niwat, Carrique-Mas, Juan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00126
_version_ 1783256779157667840
author Nhung, Nguyen Thi
Chansiripornchai, Niwat
Carrique-Mas, Juan J.
author_facet Nhung, Nguyen Thi
Chansiripornchai, Niwat
Carrique-Mas, Juan J.
author_sort Nhung, Nguyen Thi
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat, and antimicrobial usage and AMR in animal production is one of its contributing sources. Poultry is one of the most widespread types of meat consumed worldwide. Poultry flocks are often raised under intensive conditions using large amounts of antimicrobials to prevent and to treat disease, as well as for growth promotion. Antimicrobial resistant poultry pathogens may result in treatment failure, leading to economic losses, but also be a source of resistant bacteria/genes (including zoonotic bacteria) that may represent a risk to human health. Here we reviewed data on AMR in 12 poultry pathogens, including avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), Salmonella Pullorum/Gallinarum, Pasteurella multocida, Avibacterium paragallinarum, Gallibacterium anatis, Ornitobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT), Bordetella avium, Clostridium perfringens, Mycoplasma spp., Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, and Riemerella anatipestifer. A number of studies have demonstrated increases in resistance over time for S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, M. gallisepticum, and G. anatis. Among Enterobacteriaceae, APEC isolates displayed considerably higher levels of AMR compared with S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, with prevalence of resistance over >80% for ampicillin, amoxicillin, tetracycline across studies. Among the Gram-negative, non-Enterobacteriaceae pathogens, ORT had the highest levels of phenotypic resistance with median levels of AMR against co-trimoxazole, enrofloxacin, gentamicin, amoxicillin, and ceftiofur all exceeding 50%. In contrast, levels of resistance among P. multocida isolates were less than 20% for all antimicrobials. The study highlights considerable disparities in methodologies, as well as in criteria for phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing and result interpretation. It is necessary to increase efforts to harmonize testing practices, and to promote free access to data on AMR in order to improve treatment guidelines as well as to monitor the evolution of AMR in poultry bacterial pathogens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5554362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55543622017-08-28 Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review Nhung, Nguyen Thi Chansiripornchai, Niwat Carrique-Mas, Juan J. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat, and antimicrobial usage and AMR in animal production is one of its contributing sources. Poultry is one of the most widespread types of meat consumed worldwide. Poultry flocks are often raised under intensive conditions using large amounts of antimicrobials to prevent and to treat disease, as well as for growth promotion. Antimicrobial resistant poultry pathogens may result in treatment failure, leading to economic losses, but also be a source of resistant bacteria/genes (including zoonotic bacteria) that may represent a risk to human health. Here we reviewed data on AMR in 12 poultry pathogens, including avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), Salmonella Pullorum/Gallinarum, Pasteurella multocida, Avibacterium paragallinarum, Gallibacterium anatis, Ornitobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT), Bordetella avium, Clostridium perfringens, Mycoplasma spp., Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, and Riemerella anatipestifer. A number of studies have demonstrated increases in resistance over time for S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, M. gallisepticum, and G. anatis. Among Enterobacteriaceae, APEC isolates displayed considerably higher levels of AMR compared with S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, with prevalence of resistance over >80% for ampicillin, amoxicillin, tetracycline across studies. Among the Gram-negative, non-Enterobacteriaceae pathogens, ORT had the highest levels of phenotypic resistance with median levels of AMR against co-trimoxazole, enrofloxacin, gentamicin, amoxicillin, and ceftiofur all exceeding 50%. In contrast, levels of resistance among P. multocida isolates were less than 20% for all antimicrobials. The study highlights considerable disparities in methodologies, as well as in criteria for phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing and result interpretation. It is necessary to increase efforts to harmonize testing practices, and to promote free access to data on AMR in order to improve treatment guidelines as well as to monitor the evolution of AMR in poultry bacterial pathogens. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5554362/ /pubmed/28848739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00126 Text en Copyright © 2017 Nhung, Chansiripornchai and Carrique-Mas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Nhung, Nguyen Thi
Chansiripornchai, Niwat
Carrique-Mas, Juan J.
Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review
title Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review
title_full Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review
title_short Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review
title_sort antimicrobial resistance in bacterial poultry pathogens: a review
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00126
work_keys_str_mv AT nhungnguyenthi antimicrobialresistanceinbacterialpoultrypathogensareview
AT chansiripornchainiwat antimicrobialresistanceinbacterialpoultrypathogensareview
AT carriquemasjuanj antimicrobialresistanceinbacterialpoultrypathogensareview