Cargando…

Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths

Neuromyths are misconceptions about brain research and its application to education and learning. Previous research has shown that these myths may be quite pervasive among educators, but less is known about how these rates compare to the general public or to individuals who have more exposure to neu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macdonald, Kelly, Germine, Laura, Anderson, Alida, Christodoulou, Joanna, McGrath, Lauren M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
_version_ 1783256806611484672
author Macdonald, Kelly
Germine, Laura
Anderson, Alida
Christodoulou, Joanna
McGrath, Lauren M.
author_facet Macdonald, Kelly
Germine, Laura
Anderson, Alida
Christodoulou, Joanna
McGrath, Lauren M.
author_sort Macdonald, Kelly
collection PubMed
description Neuromyths are misconceptions about brain research and its application to education and learning. Previous research has shown that these myths may be quite pervasive among educators, but less is known about how these rates compare to the general public or to individuals who have more exposure to neuroscience. This study is the first to use a large sample from the United States to compare the prevalence and predictors of neuromyths among educators, the general public, and individuals with high neuroscience exposure. Neuromyth survey responses and demographics were gathered via an online survey hosted at TestMyBrain.org. We compared performance among the three groups of interest: educators (N = 598), high neuroscience exposure (N = 234), and the general public (N = 3,045) and analyzed predictors of individual differences in neuromyths performance. In an exploratory factor analysis, we found that a core group of 7 “classic” neuromyths factored together (items related to learning styles, dyslexia, the Mozart effect, the impact of sugar on attention, right-brain/left-brain learners, and using 10% of the brain). The general public endorsed the greatest number of neuromyths (M = 68%), with significantly fewer endorsed by educators (M = 56%), and still fewer endorsed by the high neuroscience exposure group (M = 46%). The two most commonly endorsed neuromyths across all groups were related to learning styles and dyslexia. More accurate performance on neuromyths was predicted by age (being younger), education (having a graduate degree), exposure to neuroscience courses, and exposure to peer-reviewed science. These findings suggest that training in education and neuroscience can help reduce but does not eliminate belief in neuromyths. We discuss the possible underlying roots of the most prevalent neuromyths and implications for classroom practice. These empirical results can be useful for developing comprehensive training modules for educators that target general misconceptions about the brain and learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5554523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55545232017-08-28 Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths Macdonald, Kelly Germine, Laura Anderson, Alida Christodoulou, Joanna McGrath, Lauren M. Front Psychol Psychology Neuromyths are misconceptions about brain research and its application to education and learning. Previous research has shown that these myths may be quite pervasive among educators, but less is known about how these rates compare to the general public or to individuals who have more exposure to neuroscience. This study is the first to use a large sample from the United States to compare the prevalence and predictors of neuromyths among educators, the general public, and individuals with high neuroscience exposure. Neuromyth survey responses and demographics were gathered via an online survey hosted at TestMyBrain.org. We compared performance among the three groups of interest: educators (N = 598), high neuroscience exposure (N = 234), and the general public (N = 3,045) and analyzed predictors of individual differences in neuromyths performance. In an exploratory factor analysis, we found that a core group of 7 “classic” neuromyths factored together (items related to learning styles, dyslexia, the Mozart effect, the impact of sugar on attention, right-brain/left-brain learners, and using 10% of the brain). The general public endorsed the greatest number of neuromyths (M = 68%), with significantly fewer endorsed by educators (M = 56%), and still fewer endorsed by the high neuroscience exposure group (M = 46%). The two most commonly endorsed neuromyths across all groups were related to learning styles and dyslexia. More accurate performance on neuromyths was predicted by age (being younger), education (having a graduate degree), exposure to neuroscience courses, and exposure to peer-reviewed science. These findings suggest that training in education and neuroscience can help reduce but does not eliminate belief in neuromyths. We discuss the possible underlying roots of the most prevalent neuromyths and implications for classroom practice. These empirical results can be useful for developing comprehensive training modules for educators that target general misconceptions about the brain and learning. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5554523/ /pubmed/28848461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314 Text en Copyright © 2017 Macdonald, Germine, Anderson, Christodoulou and McGrath. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Macdonald, Kelly
Germine, Laura
Anderson, Alida
Christodoulou, Joanna
McGrath, Lauren M.
Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths
title Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths
title_full Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths
title_fullStr Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths
title_full_unstemmed Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths
title_short Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths
title_sort dispelling the myth: training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
work_keys_str_mv AT macdonaldkelly dispellingthemythtrainingineducationorneurosciencedecreasesbutdoesnoteliminatebeliefsinneuromyths
AT germinelaura dispellingthemythtrainingineducationorneurosciencedecreasesbutdoesnoteliminatebeliefsinneuromyths
AT andersonalida dispellingthemythtrainingineducationorneurosciencedecreasesbutdoesnoteliminatebeliefsinneuromyths
AT christodouloujoanna dispellingthemythtrainingineducationorneurosciencedecreasesbutdoesnoteliminatebeliefsinneuromyths
AT mcgrathlaurenm dispellingthemythtrainingineducationorneurosciencedecreasesbutdoesnoteliminatebeliefsinneuromyths