Cargando…
Veterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners
A web-based survey was conducted by the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe with the support of the European Medicines Agency to gain a better insight into the adverse event reporting habits of veterinary practitioners and the level of information on reported adverse events that flows back to them...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000224 |
_version_ | 1783256845819838464 |
---|---|
author | De Briyne, Nancy Gopal, Raquel Diesel, Gillian Iatridou, Despoina O'Rourke, Declan |
author_facet | De Briyne, Nancy Gopal, Raquel Diesel, Gillian Iatridou, Despoina O'Rourke, Declan |
author_sort | De Briyne, Nancy |
collection | PubMed |
description | A web-based survey was conducted by the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe with the support of the European Medicines Agency to gain a better insight into the adverse event reporting habits of veterinary practitioners and the level of information on reported adverse events that flows back to them. It was completed by 3545 veterinarians. The findings indicate marked under-reporting and that the system is poorly equipped to deal with lack of expected efficacy, with few cases reported and most found to be inconclusive. It was also found that feedback systems are greatly lacking. In order to increase spontaneous reporting, there is a need to make reporting easier (eg, by developing mobile apps, to incorporate the reporting into the practice management system software) and to make veterinarians better aware of the importance of reporting and the added value it may bring. Feedback systems should be improved. The best way to motivate reporters is to demonstrate that the reports they submit are indeed useful and contribute to the improved use of veterinary medicinal products. The major role veterinarians can play in improving animal health, welfare and public health by reporting adverse events needs to be further promoted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5554794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55547942017-08-28 Veterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners De Briyne, Nancy Gopal, Raquel Diesel, Gillian Iatridou, Despoina O'Rourke, Declan Vet Rec Open Cross Sectional Study or Survey A web-based survey was conducted by the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe with the support of the European Medicines Agency to gain a better insight into the adverse event reporting habits of veterinary practitioners and the level of information on reported adverse events that flows back to them. It was completed by 3545 veterinarians. The findings indicate marked under-reporting and that the system is poorly equipped to deal with lack of expected efficacy, with few cases reported and most found to be inconclusive. It was also found that feedback systems are greatly lacking. In order to increase spontaneous reporting, there is a need to make reporting easier (eg, by developing mobile apps, to incorporate the reporting into the practice management system software) and to make veterinarians better aware of the importance of reporting and the added value it may bring. Feedback systems should be improved. The best way to motivate reporters is to demonstrate that the reports they submit are indeed useful and contribute to the improved use of veterinary medicinal products. The major role veterinarians can play in improving animal health, welfare and public health by reporting adverse events needs to be further promoted. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5554794/ /pubmed/28848652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000224 Text en © British Veterinary Association (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Cross Sectional Study or Survey De Briyne, Nancy Gopal, Raquel Diesel, Gillian Iatridou, Despoina O'Rourke, Declan Veterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners |
title | Veterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners |
title_full | Veterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners |
title_fullStr | Veterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners |
title_full_unstemmed | Veterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners |
title_short | Veterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners |
title_sort | veterinary pharmacovigilance in europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners |
topic | Cross Sectional Study or Survey |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debriynenancy veterinarypharmacovigilanceineuropeasurveyofveterinarypractitioners AT gopalraquel veterinarypharmacovigilanceineuropeasurveyofveterinarypractitioners AT dieselgillian veterinarypharmacovigilanceineuropeasurveyofveterinarypractitioners AT iatridoudespoina veterinarypharmacovigilanceineuropeasurveyofveterinarypractitioners AT orourkedeclan veterinarypharmacovigilanceineuropeasurveyofveterinarypractitioners |