Cargando…

Is the Persian Version of the “Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire” Reliable and Valid?

INTRODUCTION: The Questionnaire for Olfactory Dysfunction (QOD) is a self-reporting olfactory-related quality of life questionnaire. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Persian version of this questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirteen patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalessi, Maryam, Kamrava, Seyed Kamran, Amini, Elahe, Rafiei, Farhad, Nasouti, Mohammad Amin, Moosavi, Naeimeh, Farhadi, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819619
_version_ 1783256849819107328
author Jalessi, Maryam
Kamrava, Seyed Kamran
Amini, Elahe
Rafiei, Farhad
Nasouti, Mohammad Amin
Moosavi, Naeimeh
Farhadi, Mohammad
author_facet Jalessi, Maryam
Kamrava, Seyed Kamran
Amini, Elahe
Rafiei, Farhad
Nasouti, Mohammad Amin
Moosavi, Naeimeh
Farhadi, Mohammad
author_sort Jalessi, Maryam
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Questionnaire for Olfactory Dysfunction (QOD) is a self-reporting olfactory-related quality of life questionnaire. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Persian version of this questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirteen patients with olfactory problems were enrolled in this study. The English version of the QOD was first translated into Persian. The reliability was then tested by determining the Cronbach alpha coefficient to assess internal consistency. The QOD was reviewed by a panel of experts, followed by calculating the content validity index to determine the content validity. RESULTS: Based on the reliability analysis, the total Cronbach alpha was 0.88. The items in the “life quality” and “parosmia” domains had a good internal consistency in total, as well as in both genders and in different age subgroups. For the “sincerity” domain, however, low internal consistency was revealed (Cronbach alpha = 0.25). When questions related to the sincerity domain were omitted, the Cronbach alpha reached 0.89. The overall scale validity index for clarity and relevance were 0.88 and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Persian version of the QOD seems to be a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of quality of life in patients with olfactory dysfunction. The “sincerity” domain cannot be used separately or should be substantially modified in order to be applicable to the Iranian population. However, there is no need to change the whole format of the questionnaire.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5554812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55548122017-08-17 Is the Persian Version of the “Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire” Reliable and Valid? Jalessi, Maryam Kamrava, Seyed Kamran Amini, Elahe Rafiei, Farhad Nasouti, Mohammad Amin Moosavi, Naeimeh Farhadi, Mohammad Iran J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Questionnaire for Olfactory Dysfunction (QOD) is a self-reporting olfactory-related quality of life questionnaire. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Persian version of this questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirteen patients with olfactory problems were enrolled in this study. The English version of the QOD was first translated into Persian. The reliability was then tested by determining the Cronbach alpha coefficient to assess internal consistency. The QOD was reviewed by a panel of experts, followed by calculating the content validity index to determine the content validity. RESULTS: Based on the reliability analysis, the total Cronbach alpha was 0.88. The items in the “life quality” and “parosmia” domains had a good internal consistency in total, as well as in both genders and in different age subgroups. For the “sincerity” domain, however, low internal consistency was revealed (Cronbach alpha = 0.25). When questions related to the sincerity domain were omitted, the Cronbach alpha reached 0.89. The overall scale validity index for clarity and relevance were 0.88 and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Persian version of the QOD seems to be a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of quality of life in patients with olfactory dysfunction. The “sincerity” domain cannot be used separately or should be substantially modified in order to be applicable to the Iranian population. However, there is no need to change the whole format of the questionnaire. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5554812/ /pubmed/28819619 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jalessi, Maryam
Kamrava, Seyed Kamran
Amini, Elahe
Rafiei, Farhad
Nasouti, Mohammad Amin
Moosavi, Naeimeh
Farhadi, Mohammad
Is the Persian Version of the “Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire” Reliable and Valid?
title Is the Persian Version of the “Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire” Reliable and Valid?
title_full Is the Persian Version of the “Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire” Reliable and Valid?
title_fullStr Is the Persian Version of the “Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire” Reliable and Valid?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Persian Version of the “Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire” Reliable and Valid?
title_short Is the Persian Version of the “Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire” Reliable and Valid?
title_sort is the persian version of the “olfactory disorder questionnaire” reliable and valid?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819619
work_keys_str_mv AT jalessimaryam isthepersianversionoftheolfactorydisorderquestionnairereliableandvalid
AT kamravaseyedkamran isthepersianversionoftheolfactorydisorderquestionnairereliableandvalid
AT aminielahe isthepersianversionoftheolfactorydisorderquestionnairereliableandvalid
AT rafieifarhad isthepersianversionoftheolfactorydisorderquestionnairereliableandvalid
AT nasoutimohammadamin isthepersianversionoftheolfactorydisorderquestionnairereliableandvalid
AT moosavinaeimeh isthepersianversionoftheolfactorydisorderquestionnairereliableandvalid
AT farhadimohammad isthepersianversionoftheolfactorydisorderquestionnairereliableandvalid