Cargando…

Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Childbearing is associated with a disproportionate accumulation of visceral fat and an increased risk of metabolic disease. However, it is unknown whether the visceral fat accretion associated with pregnancy modifies a woman’s risk for metabolic disease. The purpose of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ingram, Katherine H., Hunter, Gary R., James, JaBreia F., Gower, Barbara A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.104
_version_ 1783256888322818048
author Ingram, Katherine H.
Hunter, Gary R.
James, JaBreia F.
Gower, Barbara A.
author_facet Ingram, Katherine H.
Hunter, Gary R.
James, JaBreia F.
Gower, Barbara A.
author_sort Ingram, Katherine H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Childbearing is associated with a disproportionate accumulation of visceral fat and an increased risk of metabolic disease. However, it is unknown whether the visceral fat accretion associated with pregnancy modifies a woman’s risk for metabolic disease. The purpose of this study was to test whether the association between abdominal fat and insulin sensitivity differs by parity status in healthy overweight women. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) via CT, body composition by DXA, insulin sensitivity via intravenous glucose tolerance test and minimal model (S(I)), HOMA-IR, and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO(2max)) were assessed in 212 non-diabetic, premenopausal, overweight non-Hispanic white and African American women. RESULTS: Nulliparous women (n=98) were younger, had less IAAT and higher VO(2max), but similar S(I), HOMA-IR, and leg fat, compared to parous (n=114). In nulliparous women, IAAT was negatively associated with S(I), controlling for age, race, and body fat mass (r=−0.40, p<0.001), but this relationship was attenuated in parous women (r=−0.15, p=0.16). In multiple linear regression analysis, leg fat and IAAT were significant predictors of S(I) in nulliparous, but not parous women. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that greater IAAT in parous women does not lead to greater insulin resistance; rather, transient insulin resistance during pregnancy may encourage intra-abdominal fat accumulation that is metabolically benign. This underscores the need to consider parity when assessing cardiometabolic risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5555115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55551152017-11-03 Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women Ingram, Katherine H. Hunter, Gary R. James, JaBreia F. Gower, Barbara A. Int J Obes (Lond) Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Childbearing is associated with a disproportionate accumulation of visceral fat and an increased risk of metabolic disease. However, it is unknown whether the visceral fat accretion associated with pregnancy modifies a woman’s risk for metabolic disease. The purpose of this study was to test whether the association between abdominal fat and insulin sensitivity differs by parity status in healthy overweight women. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) via CT, body composition by DXA, insulin sensitivity via intravenous glucose tolerance test and minimal model (S(I)), HOMA-IR, and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO(2max)) were assessed in 212 non-diabetic, premenopausal, overweight non-Hispanic white and African American women. RESULTS: Nulliparous women (n=98) were younger, had less IAAT and higher VO(2max), but similar S(I), HOMA-IR, and leg fat, compared to parous (n=114). In nulliparous women, IAAT was negatively associated with S(I), controlling for age, race, and body fat mass (r=−0.40, p<0.001), but this relationship was attenuated in parous women (r=−0.15, p=0.16). In multiple linear regression analysis, leg fat and IAAT were significant predictors of S(I) in nulliparous, but not parous women. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that greater IAAT in parous women does not lead to greater insulin resistance; rather, transient insulin resistance during pregnancy may encourage intra-abdominal fat accumulation that is metabolically benign. This underscores the need to consider parity when assessing cardiometabolic risk. 2017-05-03 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5555115/ /pubmed/28465610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.104 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Ingram, Katherine H.
Hunter, Gary R.
James, JaBreia F.
Gower, Barbara A.
Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women
title Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women
title_full Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women
title_fullStr Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women
title_full_unstemmed Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women
title_short Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women
title_sort central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.104
work_keys_str_mv AT ingramkatherineh centralfataccretionandinsulinsensitivitydifferentialrelationshipsinparousandnulliparouswomen
AT huntergaryr centralfataccretionandinsulinsensitivitydifferentialrelationshipsinparousandnulliparouswomen
AT jamesjabreiaf centralfataccretionandinsulinsensitivitydifferentialrelationshipsinparousandnulliparouswomen
AT gowerbarbaraa centralfataccretionandinsulinsensitivitydifferentialrelationshipsinparousandnulliparouswomen