Cargando…
Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Childbearing is associated with a disproportionate accumulation of visceral fat and an increased risk of metabolic disease. However, it is unknown whether the visceral fat accretion associated with pregnancy modifies a woman’s risk for metabolic disease. The purpose of this st...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.104 |
_version_ | 1783256888322818048 |
---|---|
author | Ingram, Katherine H. Hunter, Gary R. James, JaBreia F. Gower, Barbara A. |
author_facet | Ingram, Katherine H. Hunter, Gary R. James, JaBreia F. Gower, Barbara A. |
author_sort | Ingram, Katherine H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Childbearing is associated with a disproportionate accumulation of visceral fat and an increased risk of metabolic disease. However, it is unknown whether the visceral fat accretion associated with pregnancy modifies a woman’s risk for metabolic disease. The purpose of this study was to test whether the association between abdominal fat and insulin sensitivity differs by parity status in healthy overweight women. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) via CT, body composition by DXA, insulin sensitivity via intravenous glucose tolerance test and minimal model (S(I)), HOMA-IR, and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO(2max)) were assessed in 212 non-diabetic, premenopausal, overweight non-Hispanic white and African American women. RESULTS: Nulliparous women (n=98) were younger, had less IAAT and higher VO(2max), but similar S(I), HOMA-IR, and leg fat, compared to parous (n=114). In nulliparous women, IAAT was negatively associated with S(I), controlling for age, race, and body fat mass (r=−0.40, p<0.001), but this relationship was attenuated in parous women (r=−0.15, p=0.16). In multiple linear regression analysis, leg fat and IAAT were significant predictors of S(I) in nulliparous, but not parous women. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that greater IAAT in parous women does not lead to greater insulin resistance; rather, transient insulin resistance during pregnancy may encourage intra-abdominal fat accumulation that is metabolically benign. This underscores the need to consider parity when assessing cardiometabolic risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5555115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55551152017-11-03 Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women Ingram, Katherine H. Hunter, Gary R. James, JaBreia F. Gower, Barbara A. Int J Obes (Lond) Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Childbearing is associated with a disproportionate accumulation of visceral fat and an increased risk of metabolic disease. However, it is unknown whether the visceral fat accretion associated with pregnancy modifies a woman’s risk for metabolic disease. The purpose of this study was to test whether the association between abdominal fat and insulin sensitivity differs by parity status in healthy overweight women. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) via CT, body composition by DXA, insulin sensitivity via intravenous glucose tolerance test and minimal model (S(I)), HOMA-IR, and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO(2max)) were assessed in 212 non-diabetic, premenopausal, overweight non-Hispanic white and African American women. RESULTS: Nulliparous women (n=98) were younger, had less IAAT and higher VO(2max), but similar S(I), HOMA-IR, and leg fat, compared to parous (n=114). In nulliparous women, IAAT was negatively associated with S(I), controlling for age, race, and body fat mass (r=−0.40, p<0.001), but this relationship was attenuated in parous women (r=−0.15, p=0.16). In multiple linear regression analysis, leg fat and IAAT were significant predictors of S(I) in nulliparous, but not parous women. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that greater IAAT in parous women does not lead to greater insulin resistance; rather, transient insulin resistance during pregnancy may encourage intra-abdominal fat accumulation that is metabolically benign. This underscores the need to consider parity when assessing cardiometabolic risk. 2017-05-03 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5555115/ /pubmed/28465610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.104 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Ingram, Katherine H. Hunter, Gary R. James, JaBreia F. Gower, Barbara A. Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women |
title | Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women |
title_full | Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women |
title_fullStr | Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women |
title_full_unstemmed | Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women |
title_short | Central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women |
title_sort | central fat accretion and insulin sensitivity: differential relationships in parous and nulliparous women |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ingramkatherineh centralfataccretionandinsulinsensitivitydifferentialrelationshipsinparousandnulliparouswomen AT huntergaryr centralfataccretionandinsulinsensitivitydifferentialrelationshipsinparousandnulliparouswomen AT jamesjabreiaf centralfataccretionandinsulinsensitivitydifferentialrelationshipsinparousandnulliparouswomen AT gowerbarbaraa centralfataccretionandinsulinsensitivitydifferentialrelationshipsinparousandnulliparouswomen |